Aigner N°1 Intense by Aigner

Aigner N°1 Intense 2013

FvSpee
06/08/2020 - 07:13 AM
47
Top Review
8.5Scent 10Longevity 7Sillage

Unfortunately Lost in No Man's Land

After I was able to test two Aigner fragrances in a short period of time (my first two) and both of them pleased me very much (Super Fragrance for Men and this one), and since there is no comment yet on this "Aigner No 1 Intense," I will elaborate a bit and go back to Adam and Isztván.

It seems to me that a brand like Aigner is flying massively under the radar here on Parfumo. I suspect this is because it is being pushed around like a poor stateless person in the no man's land between Guerlinists and Marlyists and is not being let in anywhere. For the Marlyists, the brand is far too opulent, because when you think of "Aigner," you somehow think of Munich as a "world city with heart," the 1972 Olympics, Uschi Glas, as well as Derrick and Der Alte. And the Guerlinists are suspicious of designer perfumes anyway, so "Aigner" doesn't differ much from "Prada" or "Gucci" in that regard.

Looking down on designer fragrances is unwise not only because pearls can certainly be hidden there, but also somewhat unfair, as perfumes from Dior and Chanel are essentially designer fragrances too: scents from fashion houses that also indulge in fragrance lines (unlike Guerlain; Guerlain doesn't do fashion).

I believe that most people feel like I do: they only have vague ideas about "Aigner." Therefore, first a bit about the brand (and then about the fragrance): In 1904, Isztván Aigner was born in the small town of Neuhäusel (Slovak: Nové Zamky) in Austria-Hungary (Hungarian half of the empire) as the son of a Jewish lawyer, who then went to Budapest and learned the craft of bookbinding. After the end of World War I, his birthplace became Czechoslovak (now Slovak). In the 1930s, Isztván (probably also due to the increasing anti-Semitism in Hungary) moved to France, where he became Catholic, got married, had children, and from then on was called Etienne (Isztván and Etienne are the Hungarian and French variants of Stephen, respectively). He switched from bookbinding to leather fashion (bags, etc.); during the German occupation, he went to southern France and joined the Résistance. Although he was very successful after the war and the big Parisian fashion houses bought his designs, he emigrated for the second time in the 1950s, this time to New York, where he founded his own (leather) fashion label for upscale clientele.

In 1965, Aigner sold the license for the brand for all continents except America to a German businessman; thus, the German Etienne Aigner AG was established with its headquarters in Munich (and a subsidiary in Milan), in which Etienne Aigner himself never held shares. His own company (responsible only for America) was also sold by Etienne Aigner two years later, in 1967, to investors: thus, the New York Etienne Aigner Inc. was created. Both companies have nothing to do with each other and (although both changed ownership almost infinitely often) have never held shares in each other. They operate happily alongside each other, although the logo is of course the same.

I haven't investigated whether the New York company also releases fragrances, but it seems to be the case. The Munich company started fragrance production in 1975, and from the very beginning through licensing. Here too, the licensee has changed quite frequently; currently, the "Aigner" fragrances seem to be produced and marketed by Puig. The first fragrance was, not surprisingly, "Aigner No. 1." I do not know this original Aigner, but the fragrance reviewed here is said to be a close relative, so to speak, a more powerful and carefully modernized version. That could be the case, because when I read the comments on "Aigner No. 1," I occasionally feel like I'm reading comments about this "Intense" here, as I have come to know it. For the name, I therefore give 7.5 points.

No. 1 Intense is a medium to (rather) dark brown, warm-balsamic fragrance that, in my opinion, is particularly suitable for autumn. It is very spicy, with this spiciness sometimes tipping into a slightly sweet note and sometimes almost into a prickly severity, which, despite all the warmth, evokes a very focused and very masculine overall impression. The fragrance notes indicated in the pyramid give a good impression of what the user can expect here, although I would like to make some reservations and remarks:

The citrus at the beginning is bitter from the first second and solidly integrated into the woody-spicy notes, so that no independent light top note emerges, more like a bitter-citrusy oiled slide into the main theme. I only smelled the cinnamon during the second testing, but not as rice pudding with cinnamon and sugar, but as highly dosed cinnamon without sugar (which indeed results in a rather bitter taste, almost reminiscent of clove, allspice, or nutmeg).

The patchouli, which many perceive as very dominant, I also do not perceive independently. This is not a "patchouli fragrance" (and I do like patchouli); for me, it is more that this note creates a total work of art in firm connection with the oud, the other woody notes, labdanum, and the spices, in which none of the individual notes is too specifically discernible. We are rather faced with a compact but changing dark fragrance experience with earthy, leathery-animalistic, woody, and spicy, at times even fruit-in-rum-sweet undertones.

The fragrance (which also pleases the nose next to me very much) has a remarkable development as well as an (tested with strong dosage) immense longevity, without being overwhelming with a monster projection. Contrary to the pyramid (oud and castoreum at the bottom), I perceive the animalistic, strict elements more in the middle part of the fragrance progression; here it squeaks and crashes at times like the valves in "Das Boot" during deep diving; but the boat is not crushed, meaning it remains in a pleasant range. Later, however, softer, spicier-balsamic impressions come to the fore.

A perhaps not incredibly original, but very beautiful base remains absolutely stable on the skin for up to 14 hours, and even after 24 hours, once again turned in the fragrance direction, almost airy fruity, skin-close remnants can be discerned.

For me, a surprisingly beautiful fragrance experience, and after "OudTouch" by Franck Olivier within a week, my second truly beautiful, special, distinctive dark men's fragrance in the budget range. No. 1 Intense cannot be found on the Aigner Munich website, but is listed on the pages of the large online and brick-and-mortar perfumeries. The price range is wide; when comparing, you can get it for 50 or 60 euros for 100 ml.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
21 Comments
AmardonisAmardonis 6 months ago
1
What a beautiful, vivid description. I couldn't have described this completely underrated treasure better myself, thank you for that! I received it as a gift and was blown away from the very first second. A mix of fougère and a smoky oud-leather-wood note makes this fragrance simply perfect. For some, this scent might come off as an "old man's fragrance," but for me, it's an expression of masculinity and naturalness. A gift for the price!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ScapaScapa 2 years ago
I probably wouldn't have the nerves for this deep dive. Thank you for this excellent review. 🏆
Translated · Show originalShow translation
AxiomaticAxiomatic 3 years ago
1
Wonderful and informative review! Hats off!
A small point from my side:
Etienne Aigner N°1 from 1975 has unfortunately been discontinued and has nothing in common with the current Aigner N°1 from 2012. They just dropped the first name to avoid confusion.
Thank you very much for sharing your experience with the fragrance!
🏆
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DuftburscheDuftbursche 4 years ago
a very informative comment - the scent will be "moving in" with me soon.
What I still find hard to understand is the price.
For 100ml, the fragrance is offered from around €22 up to €72 -
always for the 100ml, of course -
So, according to some members, are the "cheap" ones all fakes and only the expensive ones real????
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SalvaSalva 5 years ago
A truly excellent and outstanding comment! Your very informative and helpful contribution has immediately placed this fragrance on my must-try list. I've had nothing but positive experiences with Aigner so far. Thank you!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StanzeStanze 5 years ago
I tested a few Aigners. I found Aigner N°1 Oud nice, which probably means there's no Oud in it. I got Explosive. It's great that a company delivers quality and still doesn't sell ridiculously expensive fragrances.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TorfdoenTorfdoen 5 years ago
So far, I've only known Aigner's Silver, and it completely blew me away. Its rarity made me desperately search for duplicates. To no avail. From that point on, it was clear: the brand knows what it's doing!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
KovexKovex 5 years ago
Super researched! A lot of it was completely new to me, and the scent sounds interesting too. Damn, now my wishlist has grown ;)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FlaconesseFlaconesse 5 years ago
1
Wow, thanks, I learned something new! For me, Aigner represents classic creations, and I have a lovely childhood memory: I received two miniatures from Aigner (Private Number for women and men) for my 12th birthday. That's how my passion for collecting miniatures began, which later expanded. :) The described scent sounds nice and worth testing. Best regards!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FlirtyFlowerFlirtyFlower 5 years ago
Wow, very well researched! Trophy
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SiebenkäsSiebenkäs 6 years ago
I know a few Aigner fragrances, especially No. 2, which you could often find very cheaply (e.g., at Rossmann) until now.
Definitely worth a try. I wasn't familiar with this one, so thanks for bringing it to my attention! And also for the interesting details about Aigner's company history.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
YataganYatagan 6 years ago
I've had my issues with Aigner since forever, and I only liked a few fragrances (Free Life was kind of fun back in school). This one completely passed me by, and when you mention the creaking in the middle notes, I'm already worried about Oud again.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
KonsalikKonsalik 6 years ago
I've never really seen Aigner as a brand and only know it as the **P/L King** from Parfumo. They probably aren't very well represented in the Rhineland. But this one sounds right up my alley, or rather, my (perceived) chest hair density. **24-hour rum pot trophy!!**
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MörderbieneMörderbiene 6 years ago
1
I enjoy learning here - thank you! However, the scent itself probably wouldn't be for me.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ChizzaChizza 6 years ago
1
I actually only know Aigner from the drugstore, and I guess I should take some time to test it out next time.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PollitaPollita 6 years ago
2
Look at all the research you've done for us! Learned a lot. Thanks for that!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FvSpeeFvSpee 6 years ago
1
@ MT: Absolutely valid additions! I didn't mention the internal differentiation between in-house designer fragrances and outsourced designer fragrances (where there are certainly even more sub-differentiations) because a) I'm not an expert in that area and b) the text was already quite long. But totally justified!!!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SeeroseSeerose 6 years ago
That's true, you can find "fragrance" gems among those scents as well. Ever since I've been casually browsing the Haute Couture fashion site "Net a Porter" to see what's trending in fashion, I've realized how many fragrances are designer scents.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MonsieurTestMonsieurTest 6 years ago
1
And with Chanel, the ownership story is even more intriguing and venerable, as the Wertheimers financed the fragrances for poor Coco from their successful (now producing cheap perfumes!) Bourjois company in the 1920s. In a way, the perfume history of the House of Chanel is older than the fashion itself. And it still is: in-house perfume creation with in-house master perfumers.
Pardon for all the extra info... But we do love to learn here, right?!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchatzSucherSchatzSucher 6 years ago
2
I've never looked down on designer or even drugstore fragrances; on the contrary, there are definitely some great scents out there. Aigner's Explosive from the '80s is a true fragrance masterpiece, even in the toned-down current version, and I've owned quite a few from the men's section as well. I don't know this scent yet, but if I come across it, I'd be happy to give it a try.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MonsieurTestMonsieurTest 6 years ago
1
Super informative comment that provides insightful history about the fragrance and the Aigner house! And exactly: Puig does great in-house and licensed work (Artisans-Parfumeurs, Penhaligons, CdG, etc.).
The distinction of designer fragrances is, in my opinion, a bit more complicated: There are designers (like Lagerfeld) who clearly don't care about the licenses they grant to big fragrance companies for lackluster scents. Chanel & Dior create their fragrances in-house in their own perfume labs! Makes a difference.
Translated · Show originalShow translation