28
Top Review
Here, there is no discussion
What “Azzaro pour homme” is for (Aromatic) Fougères, “Aramis” is for Chypres. The reference. The standard. Everything that others inevitably have to measure themselves against. Whether they like it or not.
53 years old. It doesn’t need to be discussed anymore. It speaks for itself. Staying true to itself over the years. Different yet unmistakable.
Reformulated? Of course! What do you think? So please stop whining. That’s life.
The addition “Pour Homme”? Come on! It doesn’t need that. It’s not called "Knize Ten pour homme" either.
Arrogant? More like self-assured. It knows what it wants. It has no time for young posers. It just doesn’t need to.
Leather? Of course. It has to be in every proper men’s fragrance. You heard right! Men’s fragrance. The contemporary sweet full-synthetic scents are not it. Even if it says “For Men” on the label and the saleswoman told you so. It’s not true.
Modern top notes? Ridiculous. Here it hits hard from start to finish. Alpha and Omega. At the same time.
A classic? It would probably say milestone instead. But it doesn’t flaunt that. Even “Habit Rouge” and “Eau Sauvage” are younger. Honestly…
Is it worn by softies? Definitely not. It wouldn’t fit. It should suit the wearer and not disguise them.
Do the voices in your head tell you to test this perfume? Yes? Then do it. Test it. It’s worth it. And if not, at least you can join the conversation.
A complete care line, please? Here you go. But don’t overdo it. A little bit of each is more than enough.
Try it out. A small bottle should be in everyone’s wardrobe.
Regards
Your Profumorist
53 years old. It doesn’t need to be discussed anymore. It speaks for itself. Staying true to itself over the years. Different yet unmistakable.
Reformulated? Of course! What do you think? So please stop whining. That’s life.
The addition “Pour Homme”? Come on! It doesn’t need that. It’s not called "Knize Ten pour homme" either.
Arrogant? More like self-assured. It knows what it wants. It has no time for young posers. It just doesn’t need to.
Leather? Of course. It has to be in every proper men’s fragrance. You heard right! Men’s fragrance. The contemporary sweet full-synthetic scents are not it. Even if it says “For Men” on the label and the saleswoman told you so. It’s not true.
Modern top notes? Ridiculous. Here it hits hard from start to finish. Alpha and Omega. At the same time.
A classic? It would probably say milestone instead. But it doesn’t flaunt that. Even “Habit Rouge” and “Eau Sauvage” are younger. Honestly…
Is it worn by softies? Definitely not. It wouldn’t fit. It should suit the wearer and not disguise them.
Do the voices in your head tell you to test this perfume? Yes? Then do it. Test it. It’s worth it. And if not, at least you can join the conversation.
A complete care line, please? Here you go. But don’t overdo it. A little bit of each is more than enough.
Try it out. A small bottle should be in everyone’s wardrobe.
Regards
Your Profumorist
Translated · Show original
8 Comments
Ja, das stimmt wohl und deshalb habe ich jetzt auch eins, ein kleines eben 30ml. Aber das wird wohl nicht lange halten. Warum nur habe ich diesen Klassiker so lange geschmäht? Ein traumhafter Duft, ein toller Kommentar!
>>>Warenkorb