Sparkling Sand by Jacques Zolty

Sparkling Sand 2017

StenLaurel
07/15/2025 - 07:14 AM
26
Top Review
9.5Scent 8Longevity 8Sillage 8Bottle 8Pricing

Not for the Sandman

"Have you been smoking again?" Peter snaps at me. "We have forest fire level four!" "Carsten will be at the door any minute!" Carsten is with the fire department. Peter is the village cat. I live with Peter. And no, I haven't been smoking.

"Sparkling Sand!" I explain. "I have a date." "With a nice perfume."
"Oh, that conspiratorial one?" "The one you talked about?" Peter is no fool.
"Yes, we want to swap. Samples. At the university."
"During the bright day?" Peter raises his whiskers. He's read too much John le Carré.
"And you're going to douse yourself with Sparkling Sand?" "Have you read what has been reviewed?"
"No, what?" "Besides, it's called reviewed. With a 'v' and 'ed'!"

"Well, then watch out!" Peter taps his paw on the mouse cinema. Opens a perfume page. Reads aloud:
"Medicine cabinet - wizard - scratchy lemon - herbal tea - grandma from the bathroom - dull apricot - grandpa's absurd pipe tobacco - ammonium pastilles …"

I have to stop him. "But there's so much more!" he interjects. Never mind, that's enough. I like this scent. What others write doesn't matter to me. To put it loosely. I enjoy the smoky aspect. It must be the incense. The leathery notes. And whatever else is in there. Lemon, for example. I usually don't like lemon. In real life, that is. But here, I do.

"Just copy the pyramid description!" Peter suggests. "Others do that too."
Sure, I could do that. But it goes against my grain. I want to convey MY scent impression here. Not what others think. Or what is listed somewhere. Period.

So: Sparkling Sand is a wonderfully niche (or is it nishe?) fragrance! Smoky. Leathery. Spicy. Fresh. Not sweet. Although "Sweet" is listed in the pyramid .. Tzzzz … It just doesn't sparkle. Unless you count the sparkle in the eyes.

A must-have for anyone who appreciates a perfume that is affordable, not hyped, not smelling like every corner, has a silly name, but smells incredibly good.
Warning, unsuitable blind buy candidate for the distinguished hype friend!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
30 Comments
LeonsLeons 3 months ago
1
One of my favorites...
Extraordinary and surprisingly beautiful.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 3 months ago
1
Oh, that makes me happy! It's one of my favorite scents too. 😊
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Paloma58Paloma58 4 months ago
1
I think I would like this sparkle too. Smoke is always good. And who can have a problem with a bathed grandma? Peter should be a bit more tolerant, please 😉
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 4 months ago
Exactly. I'll let the cheeky Peter know. I really like the scent. It's kind of the big brother of "La fumée Intense." At a sixth of the price... 😊😎
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StinkekatzeStinkekatze 5 months ago
3
🏆 I really enjoy reading your - and Peter's - reviews. Refreshingly different. And my two friends have been part of the "O.P.F.C.", the Official Peter Fan Club, for a while now.
The scent sounds very interesting; the apricot-chamomile-leather-lemon combo is intriguing.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 4 months ago
2
O.P.F.C. 😊😊😊🐈‍⬛
Yeah, the scent is definitely interesting. There are people who don’t like it, which is understandable. But I like it. I’m also not a fan of some of the scents that those who don’t like this one enjoy.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ViolaodorataViolaodorata 5 months ago
4
Worth reading review. A good, individual style doesn't need any glitter. The pyramid is a tricky thing. The souk is full of pyramid hype blind-buy candidates.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 4 months ago
1
Thanks for the compliment, we really appreciate it! ☺️🐈‍⬛
Yeah... blind purchases can be tricky...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FloydFloyd 5 months ago
4
I like Peter and his roommate :-D
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 5 months ago
1
We're both turning really red right now. 😊 😊
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Helena1411Helena1411 5 months ago
2
I don't know it. Neither the village guy Peter (he's quite a fragrant one, right?) nor the scent. But I guess I should. Or better: I want to get to know the scent. And maybe Peter too. I think he's great!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 5 months ago
3
I should let you know from Peter that he was very happy about this compliment!
And yes, the scent is polarizing. But I think it's great. Definitely give it a try. Unless you don't like smoky scents.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
YataganYatagan 5 months ago
2
Totally missed the mark for me. 😅
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 5 months ago
3
Yes, it's so different when it comes to perception. I sometimes feel the same way about certain highly praised fragrances.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ElAttarineElAttarine 5 months ago
4
You smelled really, really good at the covert meeting today. My students probably thought we were dealing drugs at the table... I'm wearing it now too - thanks for that, and you're right, it's totally underhyped or something.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 5 months ago
3
It was a huge pleasure for me! And Peter is over the moon (he asked right away). ☺️🐈‍⬛
Translated · Show originalShow translation
CravacheCravache 5 months ago
3
Peter is a pragmatist. He copies **Püramüüüden** and he gets his scents for free from you.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 5 months ago
5
A pragmatist, so to speak. You can really sense his Egyptian roots in the Püramüden.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
BosworthBosworth 5 months ago
3
I’ve always liked frankincense. And it doesn’t have to be sparkly for me either. So this sounds pretty good.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 5 months ago
2
It's not wrong either. It's really really good! 😊
Translated · Show originalShow translation
RamsauerinRamsauerin 5 months ago
4
I would also find 'niche-ig' (or 'nicheig') nice! ☺️ Thanks again - and say hi to Peter!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 5 months ago
2
Never mind... Clear. 😃 Thanks! ☺️ I'll pass that on to Peter.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
AbscheBoAbscheBo 5 months ago
4
Thanks for this "helpful" review, uh... If it came in 50 or 30 ml, or as a travel spray, I would definitely give it a try.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 5 months ago
3
It's worth it. Definitely give it a try. It's a scent that's unfairly underrated.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
HotlipsHotlips 5 months ago
4
I like your reviews, I like Peter, and I think I would probably like the scent too. I'm good with smoke and leather.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 5 months ago
3
I can definitely recommend it. It has something special. And it's very nice.
Best regards ☺️ also from 🐈‍⬛
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PollitaPollita 5 months ago
3
I thought it was great. However, the leather note made it not for me. For others, it’s definitely incredibly wonderful.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 5 months ago
2
It's really unique, to put it elegantly. 😎
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FlughörnchenFlughörnchen 5 months ago
3
You really put a stop to village cat Peter there 😅 Yes, exactly... always follow your nose, that's how I do it too... but who has anything against glitter 😂 it's great that the scent brought a sparkle to your eyes.
What you smelled sounds very intriguing! Again, very enjoyable and well written.
I’d say, not directly sought but found! Congratulations 🥳
Translated · Show originalShow translation
StenLaurelStenLaurel 5 months ago
3
There's just no glittering sand. But there is sparkle in the eyes. ⭐️ ⭐️
Translated · Show originalShow translation