Raphaël 1 Raphaël 4711 1985
9
Helpful Review
A Title - 2 Fragrances
The photos already show it - there are 2 versions of "Raphael 1," which, apart from the outer design, have no resemblance to each other.
Initially, I had the version with the green print and was very confused that my nose perceived a completely different scent than the pyramid suggested. The "green" version is a fruity-fresh, slightly sweet perfume with a distinct apple note - lovely for the last days of summer. Precious's response to my puzzled statement then provided the explanation for the discrepancy and awakened my hunting instinct for the "red" version.
Now I have both. Yes, the pyramid aligns with the red version, a typical oriental of that time. I think a little of the old "Obsession" - as I remembered it from the 80s, with a characteristic, slightly piercing note that I didn't like back then, but now I find quite charming (though I largely miss it in the overall sweeter vintage extrait of "Obsession"). Of course, "Raphael 1" is not a twin of Obsession, but the pyramid does show some parallels: sandalwood, vanilla, peach, civet, rose... but of course, these are typical ingredients for the "oriental" fragrance direction. However, "Raphael 1" is not a vanilla-heavy, lush oriental like "Casmir" or "Shalimar" - I find it distinctly unsweet, almost a bit woody-strict and yet with a rather rugged charm. For me, it is a scent that "creates distance" - so it's good for high-profile evening appointments, as it might be a bit too heavy for everyday wear.
Perhaps the two perfumes will eventually be listed separately here - then the confusion in classification will also clear up.
Initially, I had the version with the green print and was very confused that my nose perceived a completely different scent than the pyramid suggested. The "green" version is a fruity-fresh, slightly sweet perfume with a distinct apple note - lovely for the last days of summer. Precious's response to my puzzled statement then provided the explanation for the discrepancy and awakened my hunting instinct for the "red" version.
Now I have both. Yes, the pyramid aligns with the red version, a typical oriental of that time. I think a little of the old "Obsession" - as I remembered it from the 80s, with a characteristic, slightly piercing note that I didn't like back then, but now I find quite charming (though I largely miss it in the overall sweeter vintage extrait of "Obsession"). Of course, "Raphael 1" is not a twin of Obsession, but the pyramid does show some parallels: sandalwood, vanilla, peach, civet, rose... but of course, these are typical ingredients for the "oriental" fragrance direction. However, "Raphael 1" is not a vanilla-heavy, lush oriental like "Casmir" or "Shalimar" - I find it distinctly unsweet, almost a bit woody-strict and yet with a rather rugged charm. For me, it is a scent that "creates distance" - so it's good for high-profile evening appointments, as it might be a bit too heavy for everyday wear.
Perhaps the two perfumes will eventually be listed separately here - then the confusion in classification will also clear up.
Translated · Show original
2 Comments
Rosaviola 8 years ago
I only know the red version. I think it's beautiful; it reminds me a bit of Must de Cartier (perfume). I gave it away too soon. My husband wears it now, and he loves it-it smells great on him!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Elbchen 8 years ago
Ah... how I loved the burgundy Raphael!! I wore it so often!
Translated · Show originalShow translation

