Tsar is a green-herbaceous, robust-soapy, if not downright core-soapy, maximally masculine fresh fragrance that has been complexly (and skillfully) enhanced by lush floral embellishments from the eighties and a rich, almost sweetly turning base note. Thus, it does not present itself as a trivial Irish Moss variation on a rainy sheep pasture, but rather as a distinctly time-bound, independent total work of art.
At first, Tsar slams a crystalline, brutal fresh note in your face, gathering the coldest, hardest tones from citrus, green, spicy (and a bit aquatic) notes. It's like a blast of clinking ice in midsummer. For this, I would attribute the notes of Artemisia, Neroli, Bergamot, Neroli, and, already from the heart note, Pine, Pepper, and definitely, definitely the very massive, creaky shot of Juniper.
But after just five minutes, the thing reorganizes itself and becomes softer, gentler, smoother, and a bit typically furry for the time, without ever losing the herbal freshness of the beginning (which does not happen even until the end). You can now more clearly sense the foug猫re notes of Oakmoss (or whatever it has been substituted with). And, but I only manage to realize this now after five years of testing and smelling experience, a wonderfully subtle, finely spun dance of powdery Lavender and herbaceous Tarragon. I first got to know and love this combination in the much more ascetic, minimalist Scottish scent "1445." Here, I find it again, wrapped in a lush variety of other notes.
Floral notes also join in now, but by no means as prominently as their multitude in the pyramid would suggest. I hardly perceive Rose and Geranium at all, at most as generic providers of weight and depth. The fact that the fragrance seems human and friendly to me, that I like to wear it quite often, may (besides the discreetly dosed Jasmine) be due to the Lily of the Valley, the signature flower of Frau von Spee, which I enjoy smelling not only on her but also in my own fragrances.
The not endlessly, but still long-lasting base note is not highly original (except perhaps for the coconut), but offers in clean composition everything that a full-bearded men's cuddle base requires, from various woods to leather and musk, to tonka and patchouli for the sweet nuances.
* * *
I consider the naming to be a misstep. The fragrance is called Tsar, one of the two common English transcriptions of the term for the former monarch of Russia, alongside Czar. However, the fragrance evokes neither aristocratic courtly nor Eastern Russian vibes for me; perhaps aside from a very slight proximity to imagined Siberian pine forests. The Tsars rarely resided there (more likely the exiles), and besides, Lily of the Valley probably did not grow ubiquitously there, and Tonka beans not at all. I therefore assess the title as a lack of creativity, in which a label was attached to the fragrance that somehow always works for scents: emperors, kings, princesses, and countesses sell. The phenomenon that fragrances are comparatively rarely named after masons, bakers, hairdressers, architects, mechatronics engineers, or hotel staff* but are inflatedly named after empresses and counts has already been described by others.
For reasons that should be clear after reading the first part of the review, I might have named the fragrance after Mick Brisgau, the "Last Cop" from the eponymous TV crime series that I enjoy.
* thick electricians do appear though
* * *
I bought the fragrance about 4 years ago as a clearance item at TKMax, 50 ml for perhaps 19 or 29.99 euros. It is still half full. I will not minimalize it away. While it is not one of my favorite fragrances, I like it and can wear it (although more in summer than in winter) for almost any mood, in any weather, and for any occasion. And it has proven to be a good investment. After the production was discontinued, some absurd prices are being called for it online, which suggests that there are some true enthusiasts who were caught off guard by the production stop.
I can remember when I first wore the scent. A high school trip to Lucerne, an autumn visit to the sacred buildings of the Sonderbund. It was a perfect match.
I do push the boundaries from time to time and enjoy wearing my husband's "Pasha" (the old version). But I just can't imagine this one. I think it would suit nice guys much better. My "last men's fragrance" trophy stays here.
Very nice description of the actually perceivable components.
I bought it back then as a die-hard Foug猫re fan, but found it much more floral than Bowling Green.
The naming is ridiculous; it probably served as motivation for the jeweler competition for the Pasha.
Congrats on the great find!
Very nicely explained and conveyed by you. A fine scent that I didn't really appreciate in my younger years. Today it would be different. Such a beautiful fragrance..!
Wonderful, witty, but (rightly) very well-meaning report on a fine character fragrance, even though I prefer the Pour Homme a bit more. These days, high sums are also being asked for it "on the bay." Checking out Tk-Maxx is definitely worth it!
A tree of a review ;) Wonderful to read. I completely relate to your first sentence about the scent. It feels a bit too retro for me to wear myself, but anyone who likes that vibe will find it a great fragrance.
A typically excellent description from you! I didn't get along with the scent as well as I thought I would, and the bottle (which I also bought at TK Maxx) had to find a new owner. Somehow, the spicy green was too harsh for me. I preferred Pour Homme and 1445 more. But you can't love them all.
YES, it's a lovely, rich old Van C&A scent; just like their (probably also discontinued) Pour Homme.
And: Reading your thoroughly well-seasoned review of the full-bodied version is quite satisfying - you almost want to smacking your lips while reading it! ;-)
I'm afraid Maurer won't sell well. The Tsar is probably good, but I think I'll stick to my asceticism and remain loyal to the 1445 (it has fewer flowers too)...
You made a lucky find with your purchase. I've experienced that sometimes in those "stores where you can find everything you don't necessarily need," you can end up with fragrances that are either diluted or so old and altered. But hey, that's a risk you can take!
Thanks for your review, which brings back memories of a lovely classic!
I have a bottle in my collection that's about 17 to 18 years old, produced before certain regulations and bans, and it鈥檚 likely much more interesting than the version you have.
As for the naming that bothers you, I actually find it quite amusing: I can easily imagine how, in 1989, they wanted to celebrate an olfactory virility that corresponded with the name Tsar and its associations.
I really like and appreciate the brand, but I don't know the older fragrances yet. Your very informative and helpful scent description tells me that I would probably like this one too.
Ah, those old emperors and kings. Creed sends its regards. It always annoys me a bit when the name of a beloved fragrance doesn't convince me. However, the name alone wouldn't stop me from buying it if I like the scent. But with celebrities I don't like, I have bigger reservations. The fragrance would really have to be sensational to convince me to bring a bottle of Helene Fischer or something similar into my home.
The name and scent might suit Ivan the Terrible well. :D Anyway, I appreciate your review of Tsar, which I consider an outstanding fragrance. VC&A were a big deal back then, especially with pour Homme.
Great review cinema :) I really like the Tsar too, although I rarely wear it these days. But the fragrance variety of these old classics is simply wonderful.
Another hidden coconut from the late '80s, a hidden Faberg茅 egg? The Parisian diamond cutters must have had former clients in mind when they were working on the title. The scent was a bit too obvious for me, but it sounds great from your description!
I was caught off guard too (luckily I still have some "pour homme" on the shelf) and I envy a good friend his almost full bottle.
Great to hear from you. Cheers to you flying over the rainy sheep pasture!
"Timelessly chest-hairy" - wonderful! I can totally picture that! L'homme from the same brand was also quite masculine and harsh, a bit too much for me.
I bought it back then as a die-hard Foug猫re fan, but found it much more floral than Bowling Green.
The naming is ridiculous; it probably served as motivation for the jeweler competition for the Pasha.
Congrats on the great find!
This day had little potential for fun - until now. Great to read you again.
And: Reading your thoroughly well-seasoned review of the full-bodied version is quite satisfying - you almost want to smacking your lips while reading it! ;-)
I have a bottle in my collection that's about 17 to 18 years old, produced before certain regulations and bans, and it鈥檚 likely much more interesting than the version you have.
As for the naming that bothers you, I actually find it quite amusing: I can easily imagine how, in 1989, they wanted to celebrate an olfactory virility that corresponded with the name Tsar and its associations.
I really like the Tsar too, although I rarely wear it these days. But the fragrance variety of these old classics is simply wonderful.
Great to hear from you. Cheers to you flying over the rainy sheep pasture!