The miracle has indeed happened: The Lehmann perfume manufactory on Kantstra脽e in Berlin, a highly original Prussian contribution to the world fragrance heritage, is back. Mr. Lehmann, the somewhat older but by no means frail last family heir of the business, passed away unexpectedly about a year ago, just before the 100th anniversary of the company, and certainly before the succession question was resolved. The quirky little shop was closed down, and I know no one who expected a reopening.
However, it seems that a motivated team of businesspeople and fragrance specialists, who respect the Lehmann legacy and operate somewhat mysteriously in the background, has come together to continue the brand and its offerings. What has been seen so far inspires unreserved optimism: The name "Harry Lehmann" remains, the historically grown fragrance assortment is being taken over, and the tradition of bottling in simple flacons of various desired sizes is being continued. Changes have been and will be made where I would have recommended them to the old Mr. Lehmann, who apparently was not a gifted businessman: terminating unfavorable licensing agreements, establishing a fully functional online shop, moderate price increases, and a careful decluttering of the shop (with the discontinuation of the iconic but ultimately unsuitable artificial flower department).
The fragrance assortment of the "new Harry Lehmann" is therefore almost the same as that which was offered at the time of the old Mr. Lehmann's death. However, two newcomers stand out, both in name: "HL 22" and "HL 33". At least with "HL 22", it is clearly a new creation and not a traditional Lehmann fragrance. For not only was there no fragrance of this name as of 2022/2023, but the new Lehmann website also promotes the scent as "born from the first perfumes created by Harry Lehmann." This seems to imply that this fragrance was somehow experimentally blended from the formulas of the earliest Lehmann originals (it is not specified whether from those still marketed or already discontinued, or from which ones at all).
The number 22 seems to refer less to the year 1922 (although the company's advertising cautiously alludes to the Roaring Twenties) and more to the ominous (and similarly ominously continued by the new owners) Lehmann numbering system. The fragrance is designated as No. 22 - I suspect that the numbering sequence is essentially chronological, but that numbers freed up by the discontinuation of fragrances have been and will be reassigned - and I would bet that this was also the case here.
I find the fragrance itself difficult to grasp and describe, especially since I cannot connect it to any prior reviews. Upon spraying, it initially impresses as demanding and harsh, bordering on dissonance, coming across as deep and underlying; its color, for me, is a deep purple. If I had to isolate individual notes, which is generally not my strength, I would associate fruity tones (leaning towards dark fig) and sinister spices.
After at most half an hour, the scene calms down noticeably, the fragrance becomes rounder and more pleasant, but remains dense and full-bodied (without being overwhelming). I would tend to deny floral and aldehydic notes (so much for the topic of the 20s); regarding flowers, I might not completely rule out dark, heavy hints of rose or hyacinth.
While the fragrance temperature fluctuates around the zero line between cautious coolness and earthy, unobtrusive warmth, and the fragrance remains compact, almost opaque in texture, appearance, and feel, earthy-brown notes emerge, which could plausibly be explained by the notes of angelica root and woods that are noted here at Parfumo (by whoever has sniffed them), although I do not perceive HL 22 as predominantly woody.
Later on, a cheeky minty note (with stevia sweetness) tickles my nose, reminding me of another numbered fragrance from Lehmann, namely the anniversary 90, and a gourmand note oscillating between bitter chocolate gingerbread and spiced speculoos joins in.
All in all, an exciting, absolutely not failed experiment and a beautiful scent, which, according to the unanimous vote of Ms. Spee and the reviewer, is worth testing for both men and women, even if it does not have what it takes to immediately become my favorite Lehmann.
With a hopeful and successful review, you鈥檙e back. Wonderful!
It鈥檚 almost a miracle that passionate fragrance lovers have brought this Berlin institution back to life.
Lovely!
As for the scent, it wouldn鈥檛 be my first choice, but definitely worth a try.
Welcome back!
And what more can I add to what my predecessors have already left for you? I鈥檒l just join in: It's nice to hear from you again. And one request: Please don鈥檛 take another year until the next time, okay?
This one caught my attention right away, maybe just because of the almost overflowing prose that the new owners are using for marketing, especially compared to earlier times.
Regardless of the statements made on the website, I'm still a tiny bit skeptical about whether the new fragrances are actually the original Lehmann recipes. On one hand, many of the scents have been diluted down to Eau de Toilettes. That doesn't have to be a mistake, but it's just not "original" anymore.
I also notice significant differences in the new fragrance pyramids, meaning those on the new Lehmann site and the notes that Ms. Toni lists (and we agree that Ms. Toni's fragrances were "original" Lehmans, just as they came from Lutzen's mysterious cellar).
Although my job requires me not to believe anything lightly, I have no doubts that the clay men marketed as old original recipes are indeed real. Only HL22 and HL33 are marketed as new, and it鈥檚 not even claimed that they are originals, so to speak "from the will." I suspect that the 22 is a blend of several old clay men, or at least inspired by them, but nothing more is claimed.
Habanera, which I found to be so powerfully incense-like and smoky like hardly any other fragrance, is described by Ms. Toni as "sacred" with notes of leather, incense, tobacco, oak wood, and tonka bean. That definitely aligns with my scent preferences. The new page mentions "Petitgrain, geranium, rose, jasmine, mimosa, sandalwood, amber, cedar, vanilla, vetiver, musk, oak moss." THAT IS NOT THE SAME FRAGRANCE, NEVER-EVER-EVER NOT!
Well, hopefully, I鈥檒l make it back to the capital someday, and my first stop will be Kantstra脽e. And I will see...
How nice that there's a new or almost new scent from HL and that we have a detailed note here about the situation of the store and the brand, as well as the fragrance from you! Exciting and well-informed as always. We're very happy.
I'm a bit undecided whether to be more excited about the continuation of the Lehmann house or that Mr. vSpee has picked up the pen for reviews again. So I鈥檓 just doubly happy.
Nice to see you reviewing a Lehmann again, especially a new release. It'll be interesting to see how the brand evolves. And it's great to hear from you again!
Very informative review and a lovely scent description. I've been eyeing this fragrance too... maybe I'll linger a bit longer after your description :-)
Add it to your watchlist 馃挴
It's great to read another review from you! As an unregistered Parfumo user, I've really enjoyed several of your reviews, especially the ones about Eau de Colognes 馃挴
馃弳
It was fun to read again, so thanks a lot for that!
And even though the scent doesn't sound like something that screams "must-try" to me: Info is always good 馃憤
It鈥檚 almost a miracle that passionate fragrance lovers have brought this Berlin institution back to life.
Lovely!
As for the scent, it wouldn鈥檛 be my first choice, but definitely worth a try.
Welcome back!
I also notice significant differences in the new fragrance pyramids, meaning those on the new Lehmann site and the notes that Ms. Toni lists (and we agree that Ms. Toni's fragrances were "original" Lehmans, just as they came from Lutzen's mysterious cellar).
Well, hopefully, I鈥檒l make it back to the capital someday, and my first stop will be Kantstra脽e. And I will see...
It's great to read another review from you! As an unregistered Parfumo user, I've really enjoyed several of your reviews, especially the ones about Eau de Colognes 馃挴
馃弳
And even though the scent doesn't sound like something that screams "must-try" to me: Info is always good 馃憤