DaggiB

I was allowed to get to know the fragrance via a hiking package and wonder that nothing is written so far... Hm, is he so unknown or about so bad?
Would therefore like to try the beginning. Since I can hardly draw comparisons to "common" men's fragrances, I spare you a grade, but tend to a "pleasant"...

Well, in the 1st test, the fragrance initially started fresh tangy and a little pungent, I roughly classified the fragrance notes under "citrus", further notes actually remained hidden to me, differentiation impossible. Somewhere already smelled, somehow also Duschgelig and rather synthetic acting, but moderate. So I ticked him off immediately as a tendency pleasing but trivial men's freshness, certainly best suited for sports activities etc....
At least it didn't show any unpleasant leg notes, which I usually can't identify in detail, but which always strike me in men's perfumes. Soon after I fell asleep (I like to test in the evening, so I can i.d.R. completely concentrate on it), in the morning everything was completely gone.

The 2nd test was then already different: this time made themselves immediately restrained-fruity-apfelige fragrance notes noticeable and the course was overall much milder!
After about 1 hour, the base shimmered through, it flashed minimally acidic and yet increasingly warm and somehow "delicious". Amber and barely identifiable also patchouli made here probably subliminally to the work. The fragrance became more interesting and better, but was unfortunately after about 3 hours barely perceptible!

Conclusion: even if the fragrance in particular initially did not come across particularly high-quality and seems to have a rather weak durability, so he seems sympathetic to me.
It is m.M.n. a tendency rather gender-neutral fresh-fruity perfume with a nice soft finish, which I would classify as a friendly everyday fragrance or for moderate entry into the world of fragrances..

I got to know Aegean Salt & Citrus about Linneas Wanderbrief and she has asked for a few lines about it. I'm happy to comply, but the whole thing will probably turn out rather confused...
In the 1st test, the scent seemed to me fruity-citrus, pleasant and not too spiky, a little like an airy-fluffy bubble bath blanket (very discreetly soapy), the fruits rather washed out or not clearly assignable.
In the 2nd test, however, I perceived strangely only delicate floral, unspectacular but nice.
Behind it quite weak and indefinable a fresh-aquatic impression. After about 1 hour, an increasingly persistent note appeared, which reminded me of Womanity, became very dominant and should probably be attributed to sea salt. The next morning then a delicate, slightly synthetic and sweetish remnant...
(as a precaution, it should be mentioned that I later got a violent allergy on the wrist, but this can only come from this perfume with a probability of 50%)
Overall, quite a pretty and wearable fragrance, which is, however, too indefinite for me...

Since I have previously rated "Lavande", I steal the opening text there:
my fragrance copy is a miniature, which comes from the series "Parfums de Provence", you can find it in a set of five fragrances (Rose, Jasmine, Lavande, Mimosa and Violette).
The whole presentation suggests that these are "natural" waters, which I cannot judge...
The small bottle looks different from the large bottle and is more attractive to the eye, it is rectangular and puristic (with a subdivision in the middle, reminiscent of Boss Orange), is made of thick-walled glass and has a lid in the shape of a gold-coloured (rose?) flower head.

The start: yay! Violets! And how! Intense and deep purple, I can't smell anything else for a long time...
With time the fragrance becomes milder, other floral notes appear, but I couldn't assign them without the above information, maybe because I'm not that much of a flower lover.

I wish I could write as much as I did with the lavande, but actually the scent just runs out soft and lovely...
The base does not appear in my case today, sillage and durability seem to me to be rather weak. So I ask you to put my evaluation into perspective, also because it is the first one for Violette.
All in all it is a nice EdT for violet lovers, but as always everybody has to find it out for himself... :)

... so that there's something written here too:
my fragrance copy is a miniature, which comes from the series "Parfums de Provence", you can find it in a set of five fragrances (Rose, Jasmine, Lavande, Mimosa and Violette).
The whole presentation suggests that these are "natural" waters, which I cannot judge...
The small bottle looks different from the large bottle and is more attractive to the eye, it is rectangular and puristic (with a subdivision in the middle, reminiscent of Boss Orange), is made of thick-walled glass and has a lid in the shape of a gold-coloured (rose?) flower head.

At first the fragrance starts out slightly fresh and citric but with an emphasis on lavender. Then a fine sweetness and fruitiness (?) is added.
With the help of the scent pyramid I mean to smell out bit by bit all the other components of the head and heart.
The freshness gives way, lavande gradually turns into a creamy(!) soft potpourri, with vanilla and musk (both of the rather "light" variety and densely woven) at the base.
I find it difficult to classify the scent type: a little of everything and somehow not in total.
The scent is amazingly intense, with a well perceived charisma and persistent, it has a high-quality effect.

I find it difficult to recommend a target group and even if I have a tendency, the fragrance is timeless and genderless.
Although it does not fit into my prey scheme, I found it pleasant and somehow reassuring at first. Towards the base I didn't like it anymore, the vanilla-musk combination is not mine.
Unfortunately, my grading is the first one, so it is even more difficult than usual for me.
To all lovers of the fragrances listed from heart + base: Lavande is worth a test, so please don't be put off... ;)

Sorry, I have to be honest, actually I don't feel like writing, nee really not...
But once again, a fragrance has fallen into my lap for which there are hardly any assessments. And so I feel a little sorry for him, because I think he has something!
And it surprises me, because his oriental-spicy sister "Maroussia" on the other hand is quite well-known.
So, even if my comment is not technically versed, I hope that it makes you curious about this overlooked sweetheart...

The 15 ml flacon is quite nice, I like the fresh light green liquid in the iced glass.
Sprayed on, it immediately unfolds a persistent and easily perceptible fragrance bomb!
I don't recognize amber, coriander or oakmoss.
But that does not mean anything, because I am not yet practiced to interpret single scents and especially this one I had hardly turned to before
Ideally you sniff them out and enjoy them...

What I smell here is an intense and rather monothematic floral scent.
Green, juicy and thick it is!
It will probably be the narcissus, but I had never noticed it as particularly fragrant before...
The scent reminds me of this: do you know this when you enter a room where lilies are in full bloom? They fill the room and next to them any other flower can wrap itself up.
Or another example: for many years we had a so-called Chrysanthemum Ball in autumn. As a youngster I was allowed to help put thousands of flowers and decorate the hall with them. I loved the tangy green scent (which probably came from the leaves and stems). It was like the essence of a flower shop

I also perceive cedar (perhaps because I love this scent). It gives the fragrance an ethereal touch of freshness or lightness.
Some time later a soft-bright and pleasant woodiness is added.

Well. I'm not the type for fragrances where flowers are dominant, no matter what. And that's probably why I won't wear this one... But I can't help but sniffing around

I perceive the fragrance as high-quality and special and yes: authentic.
Really: I am convinced that he would make one or the other perfuma happy!

LG & stays healthy :)