NinamariahSuch an interesting thread!
Scents are indeed subjective, but more even ratings would be obtained if everyone had tried the same scents. For example, in the case of
By the Fireplace , I believe that if the user has not tried complex smoky niche scents, then the smoke will seem to come through more than for those who are familiar with dark and dirty smoky scents. Likewise, those who love strong smoke in scents do not find the scent to be smoky at all, but rather a linear vanilla scent, or something completely different. It all depends on what you are comparing it to and what you are used to. I was wondering about the scent in question again a few days ago in the store and it does not remind me of "By the fireplace" at all, but rather a rather poorly made vanilla. You should also take into account the environment in which the fragrance was tested: whether the testing took place on a quick, stressful shopping trip or in the peace and quiet of home, giving the fragrance time. Many fragrances need the right time to show their best side. When both skin chemistry and personal "normal" scent preferences are added to the above-mentioned factors, the variance in the assessment of "smokyness" begins to increase significantly.
As for
Lune Féline Eau de Parfum , the edp version is a really easy vanilla scent, the quality is good tho and I understand the wonderment about what is so amazing about it. I think
Lune Féline Extrait deserves the praise that the epd got when it was released.
I like a lot of different kind of scents myself, from very simple and synthetic to really demanding complex and natural scents and sometimes I wonder myself what makes one so pleasant, while something that is basically in the same level is completely beyond my comprehension. @Omnipotato I experience
Naxos exactly the same way as you. The scent is unpleasant, but on the other hand, Xerjoff has a lot of scents whose popularity I don't understand.
Erba Pura and
Cruz del Sur II . They smell so shocking that I can't understand how anyone could find them attractive.
Alexandria II Parfum also feels completely unfinished to my nose. I'm desperately trying to find more scents from Xerjoff that make me sigh with delight.
I have "easy" skin and I haven't come across many fragrances where one or more of the notes smelled completely "wrong" - by that I mean that I smelled dead animal carcasses, spoiled food, or something similar. So usually the scents are just unpleasant or bland for some reason.
Baccarat Rouge 540 Eau de Parfum ,
Delina Eau de Parfum ,
Cashmere & Palo Santo ,
Oud for Greatness Eau de Parfum,
Atomic Rose Eau de Parfum ,
Side Effect fall into this category. Of course, there are also houses whose fragrances I can't understand, such as Mancera or Montale, and I believe that the popularity lies more in the price and the longevity of the fragrance than in their aroma. Of course, this is also subjective. I won't comment on ordinary designer or celebrity fragrances here, because they are mainly outside my preferences.