Nectar of Love April Aromatics
25
Top Review
Quick Development
"April Aromatics' sweetest floral nectar" is the fragrance, says the descriptive text. However, a bit of a journey lies ahead, as initially, a somewhat muted floral note is introduced over a rough-sweet base (like woody cinnamon). There is certainly no talk of a floral dominance at the forefront. This dullness reminds me of the opening of some Neuffer fragrances; they often unfold very slowly from a grumbling start. I have experienced something similar with Saint d’Ici; however, this is the first time I perceive an April Aromatics this way.
In fact, it only takes a few minutes for a note of white flowers to emerge that is more sweet than stinky, which I primarily attribute to jasmine - contrary to the order presented on the manufacturer's page. And within half an hour, the fragrance then finally transforms its character: A bitter, unfruity citrus note (the peel fits!) refreshes; creamy-sweet additions and a hint of fruity candy rose along with (neroli) orange contribute to making the scent a fine nose-pleaser with a good dash of eroticism.
By midday, the balance has shifted towards the sweet-creamy side. Such things can quickly become too much for me, but here it is quite bearable. I can only - once again - feel confirmed that natural ingredients indeed offer more aromatic variety than the lab can replicate. Additionally, there is still something refreshing in the mix: A bit of fruit, which I now more distinctly associate with the orange (neroli) corner.
Soon, the creaminess of sandalwood gradually brushes against the plastic-like, acquiring a sunscreen twist and suddenly reminds me from afar (not as a twin!) of the beautiful 19 Louanges Profanes by Parfumerie Générale - and that means something. Specifically, I no longer smell anything distinctly floral. And on a hint of orangey, fluffy, vanilla-sweet (sun) cream, the fragrance concludes in the seventh or eighth hour.
Conclusion: Successful. Not nearly as overloaded and stuffy as the name and descriptions might suggest. However, the fragrance likely suits the world of women better on the skin.
I thank Serenissima for the sample.
In fact, it only takes a few minutes for a note of white flowers to emerge that is more sweet than stinky, which I primarily attribute to jasmine - contrary to the order presented on the manufacturer's page. And within half an hour, the fragrance then finally transforms its character: A bitter, unfruity citrus note (the peel fits!) refreshes; creamy-sweet additions and a hint of fruity candy rose along with (neroli) orange contribute to making the scent a fine nose-pleaser with a good dash of eroticism.
By midday, the balance has shifted towards the sweet-creamy side. Such things can quickly become too much for me, but here it is quite bearable. I can only - once again - feel confirmed that natural ingredients indeed offer more aromatic variety than the lab can replicate. Additionally, there is still something refreshing in the mix: A bit of fruit, which I now more distinctly associate with the orange (neroli) corner.
Soon, the creaminess of sandalwood gradually brushes against the plastic-like, acquiring a sunscreen twist and suddenly reminds me from afar (not as a twin!) of the beautiful 19 Louanges Profanes by Parfumerie Générale - and that means something. Specifically, I no longer smell anything distinctly floral. And on a hint of orangey, fluffy, vanilla-sweet (sun) cream, the fragrance concludes in the seventh or eighth hour.
Conclusion: Successful. Not nearly as overloaded and stuffy as the name and descriptions might suggest. However, the fragrance likely suits the world of women better on the skin.
I thank Serenissima for the sample.
Translated · Show original
15 Comments
Fluxit 7 years ago
I also thought of Neuffer here. Well described, but I find the jasmine stronger, and overall I don't pick up as much as your nose does :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MisterE 8 years ago
Well described..... even if it does sound more feminine in reality...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Palonera 8 years ago
You rarely write about eroticism in the context of a fragrance, ;-).
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Gelis 8 years ago
Sounds really good.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Pluto 8 years ago
I just bought a white floral scent blind... what a fool I am... they often don't suit me at all.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Jumi 8 years ago
Neroli was mentioned way too much for me (even in parentheses) :) The more I try to warm up to it, the more it annoys me. But I always enjoy reading your comments :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Seerose 8 years ago
Oh, leaning towards profane praise, yes, I could definitely like that; it's not a masculine scent either. Sounds lovely, especially for me as a woman.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Can777 8 years ago
It's better suited for women! But it's not bad!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Taurus 8 years ago
Yep - I flinched a bit at the white flowers too ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Ergreifend 8 years ago
The name is definitely more exciting than the content.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
First 8 years ago
Oh, I read the first paragraph and "woody cinnamon" and thought it might be more to my taste. And then the term "stinky white flowers" came up, and that was it. But, as always, good to know...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
0815abc 8 years ago
I enjoyed reading this a lot. I only know one that didn't leave a lasting impression on me.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DOCBE 8 years ago
Man, try something with vetiver again and some different men's stuff :-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Yatagan 8 years ago
That's an incredibly precise description. I can almost imagine how it smells now. It probably won't make it into my collection, but it must be nice.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Ergoproxy 8 years ago
Dull, then. *bitingmylip* :D
Translated · Show originalShow translation

