Log in
Log In
Create Account
Forgot your Password?
Log In
Home
Perfume
Forum
Community
Directory
Research
Deutsch
Join us!
Log In
Home
Perfume
Forum
Community
Directory
Research
Advanced Search
Home
Brands
Balenciaga
Cristobal (1998)
statements
CharlAmbre
Cristobal
Balenciaga
1998
Version from 1998
CharlAmbre
11/16/2024 - 03:40 AM
Cristobal (1998)
Balenciaga
4.5
Scent
6
Longevity
6
Sillage
17
26
Synthetic floral sweetness (I can just about recognize the garden carnation), on a sweet base that鈥檚 becoming more gold-patchouli. "For ladies"
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
26 Comments
InBlossom4me
7 months ago
1
Oh, I found and still find it beautiful...
It has this vanilla-warm, enveloping, protective quality.
What scent can still do that today...
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
InBlossom4me
7 months ago
1
But there鈥檚 still a trophy. 馃榿
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Stulle
1 year ago
1
Oh, not really your style? It actually sounds fun...
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Stulle
1 year ago
1
I also believe that women don't necessarily have to smell like sugary vanilla fruit....
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
CharlAmbre
1 year ago
1
Unfortunately, it's just sweet, sweet, and sweet... it lacks the trashiness, the charm, the value, the character... whatever!
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Heikeso
1 year ago
1
I must have overlooked that one back then 馃檲
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
CharlAmbre
1 year ago
You didn't miss anything!
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
FrauKirsche
1 year ago
1
... I'm moving on now :-)
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Seejungfrau
1 year ago
1
Sounds pretty skippable. :-)
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
CharlAmbre
1 year ago
Extremely unnecessary. Even old things can be mundane 馃槄
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Gandix
1 year ago
2
I liked it for a while.
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Yatagan
1 year ago
1
Passed me by unnoticed.
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Danny264
1 year ago
1
I see it less on me.
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Floyd
1 year ago
1
I'm sure it's too heavy for me too..
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Eggi37
1 year ago
1
What a shame about the great bottle.
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
CharlAmbre
1 year ago
Yes, that one looks much more promising!
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Ponticus
1 year ago
2
I would prefer this one over the men's version!
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
CharlAmbre
1 year ago
It would be too sweet for you (and that's saying something, considering we both don't have a fundamental issue with sweetness!).
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Flakon11e
1 year ago
1
The quotation marks are perfectly placed 馃ぃ
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
CharlAmbre
1 year ago
No, it was just too sweet and thankfully it's already gone 馃憤馃徎
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Flakon11e
1 year ago
1
Or maybe a bit ladylike???
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
CharlAmbre
1 year ago
1
馃槃 How often do you read statements (not literally, but boiled down to the core message): "it's sweet, floral, synthetic, flat, boring, and overall mediocre. Just for the ladies." Thanks a lot 馃檮馃槈
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
Ergoproxy
1 year ago
1
It's been too long since I had it under my nose...
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
CharlAmbre
1 year ago
You didn't miss much. In the dry down, it gets nicer, but that doesn't really save it...
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
ElAttarine
1 year ago
1
Oh thanks, then I'm not the target audience.
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
CharlAmbre
1 year ago
It seems to have rightly disappeared into oblivion anyway.
Translated 路
Show original
Show translation
It has this vanilla-warm, enveloping, protective quality.
What scent can still do that today...