Log in

Create Account Forgot your Password?
Diorling (2026) by Dior

Diorling 2026

Version from 2026
Gandix
10/15/2026, 06:07 AM
7.5Scent 7Longevity 7Sillage 10Bottle
The moss is soapy
shot through with aldehydes
Costus-root grimy
flowers diffuse
leathery and dusty
30 44
Translated · Show originalShow translation
44 Comments
StulleStulle 1 day ago
I think the 2012 version is sensational. This one sounds different, but just as intriguing, @Gandix.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
YataganYatagan 9 days ago
1
I’m looking forward to trying this one.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 8 days ago
I’m curious to hear what you think too. I don’t know the original.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SonarIDSonarID 9 days ago
1
A somewhat subdued mood.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 8 days ago
The rest was fun.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
IntersportIntersport 9 days ago
1
This sounds pretty tempting too: I think once these scents are seen more as modernizations than reconstructions, some of the pressure Dior itself has created will ease…
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 9 days ago
1
Definitely. It’s often confusing enough just going through the statements for other brands here. Pretending it’s like the old one does neither the new one nor the old one any favors.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 9 days ago
3
I want to thank each and every one of you for your replies. Sadly, people are downvoting again. And to the trolls!!! Feel free to disagree with my statement, but downvoting other Parfumo users’ replies is cowardly and shows a complete lack of decency. It has nothing to do with expertise or solidarity. Dear all, don’t let these clowns get to you.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SeejungfrauSeejungfrau 9 days ago
2
The aggressive downvoters are at it again!
I think it would be fairer if people made their opinions known. 😡
Translated · Show originalShow translation
HeikesoHeikeso 9 days ago
3
That sounds really good so far. I still need to try it out 👍
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MrtangiersMrtangiers 9 days ago
3
At least it sounds like a decent re-release.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TherisTheris 9 days ago
3
Soap followed by costus? Hmm, sounds a bit strange 😆
Translated · Show originalShow translation
LiLu77LiLu77 9 days ago
5
The “restoration” of the classics seems to have turned out pretty well overall…
Translated · Show originalShow translation
AltoBassoAltoBasso 9 days ago
5
It gives a great impression of the fragrance. Lovely-State doesn’t need to publish it.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
IrethAncaliIrethAncali 9 days ago
5
Doesn’t sound bad at all. If the galbanum behaves itself, I can handle it better these days.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 9 days ago
0
I’m already curious to see where these revisions go from here.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchatzSucherSchatzSucher 10 days ago
1
Ugh, they had to go and mix in costus... Luckily, I still have plenty of the 1963 version.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 days ago
0
Don’t say “ew” 😂 It’s more grimy than animalic. But I like costus too.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
RudiMentaerRudiMentaer 10 days ago
4
That sounds pretty good.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 days ago
0
Well.................
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Bine138Bine138 10 days ago
5
I don’t know the original either. I got to try the 2012 version once. Your words make it sound more intriguing than my notes do. :-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Bine138Bine138 10 days ago
3
Yes, that’s true too. :-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 days ago
0
It also depends on what you’re currently in the mood for.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ErgoproxyErgoproxy 10 days ago
5
The original was spectacular. A wonderful chypre.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 days ago
0
We’ll see if you’re right.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
XecutXecut 10 days ago
5
The last line sounds very intriguing. :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 days ago
0
It’s interesting to try overall.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
RogauxRogaux 10 days ago
5
That does sound lovely, though.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 days ago
0
Definitely worth trying.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Paloma58Paloma58 10 days ago
5
I don’t even know the original *blush*. The aldehydes are probably to blame-I used to avoid them.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 days ago
0
I didn’t do it consciously either.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
BosworthBosworth 10 days ago
5
I don’t think it’s quite my thing, but it sounds really well done.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
HasenNaseHasenNase 10 days ago
0
Sounds interesting, though that “pun” puts me off: Di|or|iginals-yikes.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
carrioncrowcarrioncrow 10 days ago
4
I might like it with that Costusschmuddel.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ElAttarineElAttarine 10 days ago
4
Ha, “Costus-grimy” certainly sounds appealing. Now I’m curious about the whole line...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 days ago
0
@ElAttarine: I’d already counted on you for the colorful mix.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ElAttarineElAttarine 10 days ago
3
Oh, how lovely, dear @Gandix! Can I join you??
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 days ago
0
I have a few of these. I’ll send the first ones out as a round-robin letter soon.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
NuiWhakakoreNuiWhakakore 10 days ago
4
It’s already a good sign if the re-release isn’t a total flop…
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 days ago
0
I think so too....
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SeejungfrauSeejungfrau 10 days ago
0
Sounds right up my alley. :-)
The elegant design is really well done.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SeejungfrauSeejungfrau 9 days ago
2
The aggressive downvoters are at it again!
I think it’d be fairer if people made their opinions known publicly. 😡
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 days ago
0
I won’t be buying it-there are too many aldehydes for my taste. But I do quite like it.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 days ago
3
I tried the new version; I don’t knowingly remember the old one. Galbanum doesn’t stand out from the overall green blend, and it seems a little powdery with musk.

Overall, I like it and find it wearable. A successful translation of a vintage scent into the modern era. Probably toned down compared with the old one, though as I said, I don’t know it.
Translated · Show originalShow translation