Irrésistible Givenchy (Eau de Parfum Nude Velvet) by Givenchy

Irrésistible Givenchy 2025 Eau de Parfum Nude Velvet

UntermWert
11/15/2025 - 02:13 PM
13
22
starts with surprisingly soft balanced iris powder and ambrette, initially nice and skin-like, but unfortunately turns sweet-floral-creamy over time.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
22 Comments
SpatzlSpatzl 12 hours ago
Didn't really impress me.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SeejungfrauSeejungfrau 4 days ago
I should give it a try. Just being serious.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 4 days ago
1
@Seejungfrau I’d be very curious about your impression. If you like the opening but maybe find the creamy twist a bit off-putting, I’d recommend Vermeil. It feels like a vintage makeup bag.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SaphoSapho 4 days ago
Some of my favorite perfumers were involved in the creation. I think I’ll give it a chance, even though I’m not a fan of sweet-floral-creamy scents at all.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 4 days ago
I'm curious to hear what you think of it.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
NuiWhakakoreNuiWhakakore 4 days ago
he's not exactly irresistible...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 4 days ago
but generally pleasant
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ViolettViolett 4 days ago
I would give it a chance.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 4 days ago
1
@Violett I was surprised that it stands out positively from current fragrances. It's definitely worth testing!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 4 days ago
Sometimes it can be nude.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 4 days ago
@Gandix Definitely. For the authentic lipstick scent, I would recommend Vermeil instead.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ElAttarineElAttarine 4 days ago
sweet-sticky zeitgeist fragrance scene and bunny slippers... that's not for me...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 4 days ago
It's not sweet-sticky, but it does go through a somewhat undifferentiated sweet-floral phase. Overall, considering current fragrance trends, it's quite pleasant - but you're right, it probably wouldn't be your thing. 😉
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FloydFloyd 5 days ago
Yeah, I'll let it go then...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 5 days ago
only with bunny slippers 😉
Translated · Show originalShow translation
KrapnekKrapnek 5 days ago
Too bad about the ending, but it still sounds solid.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 5 days ago
1
It's alright and definitely not unpleasant.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Sweetsmell75Sweetsmell75 5 days ago
I would probably have issues with sweet floral creamy too.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 5 days ago
1
It was compared here to LVeB, which I always avoid and don't know very well. If the sweet-floral part didn't last so long, it would actually remind me of nude makeup. If I were in the mood for a classic lipstick scent, I would prefer Vermeil.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 5 days ago
3
First of all, a really pleasant, skin-enhancing powder scent that didn’t need the creamy twist for me; surprisingly nice in the sweet, sticky zeitgeist fragrance scene.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
RogauxRogaux 5 days ago
Sounds pretty good, actually. 🙂
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 5 days ago
1
It's definitely worth a try, but the creamy twist unfortunately takes away some of the uniqueness.
Translated · Show originalShow translation