L'Orchidée Terrible Imaginary Authors 2012
15
Top Review
Cellar Spirits or: Once the Reputation is Ruined...
Back then, when I started to describe fragrances, to paraphrase them, to capture the stories they told me, I made a resolution:
I never wanted to write a scathing review, never wanted to compose a thoroughly negative comment, never wanted to pour scorn and sulfur over a perfumer and their work.
This resolution was based on decades of experience, where my first encounter with an image, a book, a film, or indeed a fragrance lacked the necessary maturity to understand the work.
How often have I devoured a book in one night that I had initially set aside after a few pages out of boredom?
How perplexed I stood in my twenties before classics like "Mitsouko," "Chamade," the old Chanels and Diors, wrinkling my nose and wondering what anyone could find in such outdated, musty waters?
Today, I am happy when I can add treasures like "Jicky," "Soir de Paris," or a Caron to my collection - today I often find the access that was denied to me in my younger years and that I still cannot find with certain fragrances.
If this inability lies with me, how could I punish a fragrance I do not understand and its creator?!
Those were my thoughts back then, and they are essentially still the same today.
But for the first time, I am now confronted with a "perfume" that makes it very difficult, if not impossible, for me to extract anything good from it.
It is clear: I cannot like every perfume, not every scent is made for me.
It can still be beautiful in its own way and excellently crafted, yet a confrontation should ideally occur as independently of my personal taste as possible.
However, with this expectation, I seem to be failing with "L'Orchidée Terrible."
"Cellar Spirits!" is my first thought as I somewhat recover from the olfactory punch directly to the nose that the opening of "L'Orchidée Terrible" delivers.
I am a child of the seventies, and during that time, cellar spirits sparkling wine was the Dom Pérignon of the common people.
The bottle cost no more than two marks back then - and the smell of the contents reflected that, and I suspect it did not taste much better.
This half-forgotten scent jumps at me from my sprayed skin, mixed with something scratchy-soapy-sweet that I cannot identify for the life of me - and do not really want to, as the impulse to immediately and without delay scrub my wrist with steel wool and, if necessary, amputate it is too strong.
But I persevere; I owe it to the fragrance (???) and to myself - so often a dreadful start has hidden true treasures that could only be discovered and enjoyed with a little patience.
I wait, I hope, I struggle for breath in the swirling cloud that is now gradually moving towards room or toilet spray from the aforementioned 70s.
This does not do me any good; I proactively forgo any food intake, fearing that otherwise, I would push my stomach to the limits of its tolerance.
And I am glad and happy that the man by my side is blissfully unaware and odorless, heading towards Corsica on his BMW, because in any other case, I would have to expect a house ban.
After about two hours, a distinct hairspray note emerges, which does not completely drive away the cellar spirits but does keep them somewhat in check.
My hope for at least some longevity is dwindling - the endurance of the dreadful orchid is beyond good and evil; only after a good eight hours is a floral-aldehydic, strongly synthetic base reached, which exhibits a certain softness and makes the scent impression almost bearable at that point.
But only almost.
Now, it is sometimes the case that fragrances that one does not find particularly appealing are perceived as wonderful by others - I last experienced this with "Chocolate Bite," for which I received more compliments than for almost any other fragrance.
With this thought in mind - one wants to be fair! - I decide to wear "L'Orchidée Terrible" again today in class to see how the participants and colleagues would react.
Oh dear.
Not a good idea.
"Did you just come from a sparkling wine breakfast?" greets me my colleague as I enter her office after a good half-hour walk through sun and wind.
"Uh - no, that's my perfume for today!"
Raised eyebrows and a skeptical appraisal follow - along with the question of whether I am really feeling well.
A few minutes later, on the way to the classroom: "Did you celebrate long last night?" grins a participant who catches up to my side from my wake.
With an inner sigh, I forgo the explanation that no one would believe anyway - and now I have to think about how to restore my reputation!
I never wanted to write a scathing review, never wanted to compose a thoroughly negative comment, never wanted to pour scorn and sulfur over a perfumer and their work.
This resolution was based on decades of experience, where my first encounter with an image, a book, a film, or indeed a fragrance lacked the necessary maturity to understand the work.
How often have I devoured a book in one night that I had initially set aside after a few pages out of boredom?
How perplexed I stood in my twenties before classics like "Mitsouko," "Chamade," the old Chanels and Diors, wrinkling my nose and wondering what anyone could find in such outdated, musty waters?
Today, I am happy when I can add treasures like "Jicky," "Soir de Paris," or a Caron to my collection - today I often find the access that was denied to me in my younger years and that I still cannot find with certain fragrances.
If this inability lies with me, how could I punish a fragrance I do not understand and its creator?!
Those were my thoughts back then, and they are essentially still the same today.
But for the first time, I am now confronted with a "perfume" that makes it very difficult, if not impossible, for me to extract anything good from it.
It is clear: I cannot like every perfume, not every scent is made for me.
It can still be beautiful in its own way and excellently crafted, yet a confrontation should ideally occur as independently of my personal taste as possible.
However, with this expectation, I seem to be failing with "L'Orchidée Terrible."
"Cellar Spirits!" is my first thought as I somewhat recover from the olfactory punch directly to the nose that the opening of "L'Orchidée Terrible" delivers.
I am a child of the seventies, and during that time, cellar spirits sparkling wine was the Dom Pérignon of the common people.
The bottle cost no more than two marks back then - and the smell of the contents reflected that, and I suspect it did not taste much better.
This half-forgotten scent jumps at me from my sprayed skin, mixed with something scratchy-soapy-sweet that I cannot identify for the life of me - and do not really want to, as the impulse to immediately and without delay scrub my wrist with steel wool and, if necessary, amputate it is too strong.
But I persevere; I owe it to the fragrance (???) and to myself - so often a dreadful start has hidden true treasures that could only be discovered and enjoyed with a little patience.
I wait, I hope, I struggle for breath in the swirling cloud that is now gradually moving towards room or toilet spray from the aforementioned 70s.
This does not do me any good; I proactively forgo any food intake, fearing that otherwise, I would push my stomach to the limits of its tolerance.
And I am glad and happy that the man by my side is blissfully unaware and odorless, heading towards Corsica on his BMW, because in any other case, I would have to expect a house ban.
After about two hours, a distinct hairspray note emerges, which does not completely drive away the cellar spirits but does keep them somewhat in check.
My hope for at least some longevity is dwindling - the endurance of the dreadful orchid is beyond good and evil; only after a good eight hours is a floral-aldehydic, strongly synthetic base reached, which exhibits a certain softness and makes the scent impression almost bearable at that point.
But only almost.
Now, it is sometimes the case that fragrances that one does not find particularly appealing are perceived as wonderful by others - I last experienced this with "Chocolate Bite," for which I received more compliments than for almost any other fragrance.
With this thought in mind - one wants to be fair! - I decide to wear "L'Orchidée Terrible" again today in class to see how the participants and colleagues would react.
Oh dear.
Not a good idea.
"Did you just come from a sparkling wine breakfast?" greets me my colleague as I enter her office after a good half-hour walk through sun and wind.
"Uh - no, that's my perfume for today!"
Raised eyebrows and a skeptical appraisal follow - along with the question of whether I am really feeling well.
A few minutes later, on the way to the classroom: "Did you celebrate long last night?" grins a participant who catches up to my side from my wake.
With an inner sigh, I forgo the explanation that no one would believe anyway - and now I have to think about how to restore my reputation!
Translated · Show original
10 Comments
Seerose 11 years ago
It must be quite a terrible scent, really. It wasn't in the mystery box, good. But it doesn't sound that bad, actually quite promising. Well, this cup has passed me by, now I pass it on to you :-D
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Blauemaus 11 years ago
So much for whether we should subject our fellow humans to complex niche fragrances. *grins* Cheers!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Alfazema 12 years ago
Delicious comment! ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Mandelmaus 12 years ago
Bad experience, but good comment. Thank you ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Dobbs 12 years ago
If a scathing review helps keep unsuspecting perfume lovers from nose collapse and gasping for breath... bring it on!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Aura 12 years ago
Now that the rule has been broken, I hope for many more entertaining reviews like this from you! ;o) The smell of champagne is just disgusting, oh dear, you poor thing. I'd love to give you three trophies: for the comment, for the warning, and for your ambition to wear it!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Yatagan 12 years ago
Yes, that IS a harsh critique. I want to write one too; I don't have any in my collection yet. ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Hasi 12 years ago
The bad thing is that champagne on clothes often smells a bit like sour vomit; I've experienced that on my coat. Not nice, but the comment is lovely! :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
0815abc 12 years ago
Well written and congratulations, now you can take a deep breath again.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Ergoproxy 12 years ago
The case of young W.! I'm laughing so hard I'm about to wet my pants! Kellergeister Gold Extra! That brings back some bad memories, because unlike you, I've already tried it... uh, tasted it. Courage trophy!
Translated · Show originalShow translation

