63
Top Review
In Search of the Holy Grail
Uncommented Scents No. 110
Don't worry! This comment is not the next unreflective panegyric on a fragrance that the author perceives as the Holy Grail, suggesting a blind purchase to the reader and risking disappointment afterward. The title refers solely to the name of the fragrance, namely the Grail Knight Galahad (here: Sir Gallahad), who in the legend ultimately finds and holds the Grail. Furthermore, the name alludes to an older predecessor fragrance from the house of Isabey from 1924, about which, in my opinion, not much more is known. It was apparently also a men's fragrance (no surprise with that name) and likely did not smell as floral as the 2017 version. Notably, the use of crocus (related to saffron: In the translation, some references mention crocus, which the color of the liquid would also suggest, while others mention saffron, which I do not perceive here) is particularly striking, as it is found in only three other men's fragrances and thus ranks among the most exotic scent notes. Whether in this case the flowers (there are fragrant varieties) or other plant parts, such as the root, are processed, I cannot say. In any case, this fragrance presents a quirky herb-floral aura that somewhat resembles violet. However, since the fragrance also contains gardenia (strongly) and jasmine (barely identifiable), it is likely a floral blend that I cannot further differentiate, but it gradually becomes sweeter towards the base.
I also find it striking that the mention of incense and tobacco can hardly be verified. The fragrance has neither a strong smoky character nor does the typically aromatic scent of tobacco play a significant role. It may be that these are nuances that contribute more to the overall impression. The same applies to other often dominant scent notes like vetiver or amber. Everything comes together in a harmonious overall picture of a herb-floral mélange that is by no means clearly masculine. At no time does one get the impression that synthetic fragrance substances dominate; everything feels quite natural.
Sir Gallahad is more of a minstrel than a sword-swinger and certainly also an option for the ladies at court. A beautiful, new accent in the tableau of men's fragrances and therefore worth a test. It would certainly be worthwhile to research the old version of Sir Gallahad from 1924. Perhaps there is at least a spiritual kinship. I will set out on the search for the Grail. Anyone who can show me the way is warmly invited to join me, noble knights!
Don't worry! This comment is not the next unreflective panegyric on a fragrance that the author perceives as the Holy Grail, suggesting a blind purchase to the reader and risking disappointment afterward. The title refers solely to the name of the fragrance, namely the Grail Knight Galahad (here: Sir Gallahad), who in the legend ultimately finds and holds the Grail. Furthermore, the name alludes to an older predecessor fragrance from the house of Isabey from 1924, about which, in my opinion, not much more is known. It was apparently also a men's fragrance (no surprise with that name) and likely did not smell as floral as the 2017 version. Notably, the use of crocus (related to saffron: In the translation, some references mention crocus, which the color of the liquid would also suggest, while others mention saffron, which I do not perceive here) is particularly striking, as it is found in only three other men's fragrances and thus ranks among the most exotic scent notes. Whether in this case the flowers (there are fragrant varieties) or other plant parts, such as the root, are processed, I cannot say. In any case, this fragrance presents a quirky herb-floral aura that somewhat resembles violet. However, since the fragrance also contains gardenia (strongly) and jasmine (barely identifiable), it is likely a floral blend that I cannot further differentiate, but it gradually becomes sweeter towards the base.
I also find it striking that the mention of incense and tobacco can hardly be verified. The fragrance has neither a strong smoky character nor does the typically aromatic scent of tobacco play a significant role. It may be that these are nuances that contribute more to the overall impression. The same applies to other often dominant scent notes like vetiver or amber. Everything comes together in a harmonious overall picture of a herb-floral mélange that is by no means clearly masculine. At no time does one get the impression that synthetic fragrance substances dominate; everything feels quite natural.
Sir Gallahad is more of a minstrel than a sword-swinger and certainly also an option for the ladies at court. A beautiful, new accent in the tableau of men's fragrances and therefore worth a test. It would certainly be worthwhile to research the old version of Sir Gallahad from 1924. Perhaps there is at least a spiritual kinship. I will set out on the search for the Grail. Anyone who can show me the way is warmly invited to join me, noble knights!
Translated · Show original
33 Comments
This Sir Galahad seems to be more than just interesting.
Since I'm totally unmotivated about work today, I’d love to join in the search for old Sir Gallahad and the Holy Grail :). And I’ll leave a little trophy there too.