Strictly by Jil Sander

Strictly 2015

FabianO
05/17/2016 - 10:17 AM
9
Top Review
7Scent 6Longevity 6Sillage 6Bottle

More solid than expected: Wearable understatement full of mild spiciness

This is now fragrance No. 3 after Davidoff's "Horizon" and Dior's "Sauvage," which hint at a certain system among the newcomers of 2015/2016 in their composition.

Moving away from intrusive, often artificial and nose-irritating cocktail-like scents and overwhelming sweetness - towards a gray, office-friendly wearability that avoids clashes.
Is this good? Certainly better than the watery fragrances of the last 3-4 years that you wanted to scrub off your skin within 10 minutes.

"Solid" might be the new keyword here. To add right away: None of these are hits. They don’t engrave themselves into olfactory memory and do not change the fragrance world. But - and this must be added - they do demonstrate a bit more taste and style in their simple clarity.

"Strictly" now stands out after what feels like half a dozen really bad new releases from Jil Sander with a decent, quite naturally achieved wearability.

Overall, it is quite buttery soft, offering at the beginning a rather nice, minimally sweet base spiciness, which essentially consists of mild cardamom and pepper. The listed rum note may represent the marginal sweetness. It is office-appropriate and quite pleasant to smell in its basic configuration.

Vetiver lies as a foundation beneath everything, a mainstream vetiver, though, far from the old-school or niche vetivers, but subtly green-grassy, with even a hint of smokiness, and somewhat woody.

As Leimbacher aptly writes: No fragrance one would attribute to a Cary Grant, Alain Delon, or George Clooney, as it is simply too shallow and unremarkable. But it is straightforwardly wearable - without fuss, without irritations in the nose, without an artificial, persistent headache tone.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
10 Comments
ScottieScottie 6 years ago
I can only agree with SouthWest 100% :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DistainDistain 8 years ago
A comment that I would classify as conventional! A composition that works for me as a "safe bet."
Translated · Show originalShow translation
VollbartVollbart 9 years ago
Sounds interesting, adding it to my wishlist.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DOCBEDOCBE 9 years ago
That falls under residual risk...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FabianOFabianO 9 years ago
That always makes me nervous. What if a blind buy goes wrong? ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DOCBEDOCBE 9 years ago
Your comment was decisive for a blind buy at TKM. And after a first test, I don't regret it either.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
CrowzenCrowzen 9 years ago
I also think that the combination of pepper and the sweet base has a rather unique quality.
Everything else fits in my opinion.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Honk1510Honk1510 9 years ago
It has a bit of Quorum Silver to it.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SouthWestSouthWest 9 years ago
On the contrary. The scent has character, a high recognition value, and just smells good, which brings us to the essence of the perfume. Some pompous niche fragrances can hide behind it with bravado. If it cost five times as much, the reviews here would be different. And maybe George Clooney would wear it too. People, please set aside the snobbery and keep things in perspective...!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FlankerFlanker 9 years ago
I wouldn't wear it to the office either. Unless you're specifically looking for it, you probably won't notice it in any fragrance store. It feels like we're being overwhelmed by the marketing of the big mainstream brands. 7.0 fits...
Translated · Show originalShow translation