ParfumAholic
02/09/2025 - 09:47 AM
30
Top Review
6Scent 8Longevity 7Sillage 8Bottle 8Pricing

Crime Scene: Königsaller 62, 40212 Düsseldorf (Neo-Chypre by Jil Sander)

The Jil Sander boutiques are always a special place of tidiness and calm for me. Nothing to distract the eye, no unnecessary frills, the noble fabrics hang in rows along the bright walls, warm light invites you to linger. No hustle, no rummaging through piles of clothes. The spirit of the legendary guardian of aesthetics, the uncompromising nature in terms of design, presentation, and quality is still clearly felt even years after Jil Sander, the Queen of Less, has left.

So I was all the more excited to get to know the new fragrance line from the house in the store on Kö in Düsseldorf, which is meant to represent the style of the house.

The entire line is presented soberly, coolly, and unpretentiously in the center of the store. White bottles on a white background - this type of presentation is of course not surprising and I really like it.

Less appealing to me are the white lacquered metal covers, which leave room for interpretation, but are supposed to protect the (allegedly) mouth-blown bottles from light exposure. A plausible explanation, but I really don't like the implementation. More on that later.

My "objects of desire" were "Black Tea," "Coffea," "Earth," and "Smoke" (although I had already experienced Black Tea through a sharing).

Earth provides grounding. Roses and patchouli are dressed in a Neo-Chypre outfit made of aldehydes. However, I find the soapy quality here rather unpleasant, as it heavily dominates the roses and patchouli and is very scent-defining and even perceptible after hours. For me, it’s not a comforting soapiness of old days, but rather of an excited, somewhat exaggerated nature. A little less soapiness and instead more rose and patchouli would have been much more to my liking. But still, it's nice that even today, one dares to tackle the theme of Chypre at all.

Conclusion: Not my kind of Chypre, but it will certainly find its fans.

Now to the bottles: The glass bottles are quite nice to look at, round and with air bubbles in the glass. They fit well in the hand and the spray heads work flawlessly. Instead of the usual caps, white lacquered metal bells are placed over the bottles to protect the contents from light exposure. This makes sense, but the implementation doesn’t necessarily appeal to my taste, as it looks very "organic." I would be very interested to know what Jil Sander herself would say about this…. But as we know, taste is subjective.

Here’s an excerpt from the American Vogue with Lucie and Luke Meier, chief designers of Jil Sander, regarding the bottles:
Quote: "Of course, the bottles themselves are a statement. Made in collaboration with FormFantasma, each of the glass bottles is perfectly imperfect and is meant to show bubbles and other things that were once considered imperfections in the industry. 'We felt that this gives the bottles a lot of soul and adds a human touch to them,' says Luke. 'Packaging can be very industrial, and we wanted to make it artisanal.'
Instead of a closure, each bottle comes with a white porcelain bell that fits perfectly. It is incredibly satisfying to put it on and take it off. 'It felt very human to create this gesture of putting the cap back on after use,' says Lucie. It is also practical - sunlight can quickly spoil a fragrance, and the opaque cap prevents potential damage. 'We liked the natural colors of the bottle and the fragrance, so this was our solution.'
Formafantasma is a research-oriented design studio that examines the ecological, historical, political, and social forces shaping the design discipline today. Whether designing for a client or developing self-initiated projects, the studio always applies the same rigorous attention to context, processes, and details. Formafantasma's analytical character is reflected in careful visual results, products, and strategies." (End of quote)

All in all, I can say that the tested fragrances did not completely convince me. They are far from bad, but also not the big hit I had hoped for. In terms of quality, they are perfectly fine and certainly worth the €230 for 100ml. The design (apart from the strange "bells") is also acceptable, and the fact that they are refillable bottles fits with the sustainability mindset of our time. Only that the fragrances unfortunately will not remain sustainably in my memory.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
49 Comments
SetaSeta 8 months ago
So a bit of a soapy vibe here? It's a shame the scents aren't a big hit...
About the bottles: Now that you mention it, I see it too :-D If it's what I think, it would be made of rubber, right...?
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SetaSeta 8 months ago
Hi there! You can see it as a 'feminine' form... or as a 'Parisian' masculine form. Just a phantom form, really :-D But let's leave it at that...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 8 months ago
1
I see it that way too. Not my kind of chypre, somehow forced into a neo style. I think you're right... those thoughts crossed my mind as well, especially regarding the materials 🙈
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParmaParma 10 months ago
Thank you for your four assessments!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 9 months ago
1
You're very welcome! 😀
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SonarIDSonarID 10 months ago
A beautiful cheese dome ✨💫😎
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 9 months ago
1
And I was already worried 😉
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SonarIDSonarID 9 months ago
That's what I actually meant by that @ParfumAholic 😅
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 9 months ago
1
Honestly, I find it rather unattractive...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PlutoPluto 10 months ago
Next chance I get, I'll stop by there. Chypre is tempting me, even if it doesn't convince you 😉
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 9 months ago
Of course, you don't have far to go, and nothing beats your own impression.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Gera1997Gera1997 10 months ago
I personally find it appealing, but the rose might ruin the scent, which is really a shame. Great review! :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
I found that the soapy note really overshadowed the rose.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
AxiomaticAxiomatic 10 months ago
Oh dear, overdrive here...
Well.
It's a shame that the Sander fragrances from the 1980s aren't being reissued.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
1
If that happened, I would camp out in front of the store.....
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Medusa00Medusa00 10 months ago
Very well described. I'm an absolute Chypre fan. I usually prefer the classics, though. Should this one be a discovery? I really like the soapiness from the "old-school start." However, what has come out as so-called Chypre in recent years is a joke. Best, M.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
I might slightly doubt that it's a discovery. But in the end, it's all about personal feelings. Let's just say, it's definitely worth a try.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
0815abc0815abc 10 months ago
Really enjoyed reading this!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
Thank you so much, that makes me happy!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 10 months ago
Very interesting review - since I'm just starting to explore spicy-floral Chypres, this one might be worth a try... although I don't really believe it... but thanks to your very informative description, I'll keep it in mind if I come across the scent. Or maybe I should take a short trip to Düsseldorf...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
Thank you very much, I'm glad! They're definitely worth a try, but I just doubt they would enchant you. You're right, the "bells" are awkward and sit quite firmly on the glass body. If you ever come to Düsseldorf, definitely let me know!!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 10 months ago
PS: the bell feels a bit unwieldy overall...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SeeroseSeerose 10 months ago
All right, it seems like they are variations of SUN. No matter what's in the ingredient lists?
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SeeroseSeerose 10 months ago
So there are plenty of aldehydes in it? That doesn't really increase my interest. But it's true: I was really happy to read something from you. It's become quite rare, hasn't it?
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
1
I wouldn't see it that way, as I didn't perceive Sun as so soapy.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchatzSucherSchatzSucher 10 months ago
I agree with my colleague @Ergoproxy, as I see it the same way. This scent does intrigue me a bit more; my tolerance for soapiness is quite high 😅
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
1
I can only agree with both of you.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ErgoproxyErgoproxy 10 months ago
2
I'm getting really tired of all these exclusive lines. Valentino now has a counter in Alsterhaus, right next to Balmain. What you often get is just polished mainstream at an inflated price. They probably won't regain the reputation that Jil Sander once had in the perfume market with this. Of course, I would still test the scents out of sheer curiosity.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
I’m with you on that! I don’t think this fragrance line will change the world either, but it’s still worth a try.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 10 months ago
I only like Chypre if it's really, really old.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
I think we can agree on that.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SpatzlSpatzl 10 months ago
It's a shame when you approach the topic of Chypre in such an artificial, modern way.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
I think so too. Not everything that’s new has to be good / better.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ScentwolfScentwolf 10 months ago
1
What a load of marketing nonsense!!!
Since JS sold it, it's just not what it used to be. UNFORTUNATELY!!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
I completely agree with you!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ViolettViolett 10 months ago
I would raise the bell for a sniffer here too...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
I don't see any reason not to.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
KovexKovex 10 months ago
The scent probably wouldn't be my thing. Thank you for the introduction!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
Of course!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PollitaPollita 10 months ago
Neo-Chypres have rarely convinced me. Thanks for your reviews!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
Sure thing. And I hardly know Neo-Chypre. I think I prefer the older ones.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
AndinAndin 10 months ago
I completely agree with you; there are definitely some sympathy points for daring to create a Chypre. It's a shame it didn't turn out that well.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
1
I expected a lot more from this one.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DuftgroupieDuftgroupie 10 months ago
Well, these bottles aren't really my thing 🏆
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
At least we're two then ;-)))
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FloydFloyd 10 months ago
I don't think it's for me, but I enjoyed reading your review series.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
Thank you very much, I'm glad to hear that.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PreciousPrecious 10 months ago
I really enjoyed reading this. It's a shame that you didn't like the scents much.
The quote is just artistic nonsense; it doesn't make the ugly bell any prettier.
In an elegant Jil Sander boutique, it might seem artistic; I don't like the presentation at all.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 10 months ago
Thank you very much, I'm glad! As for the bottles - I completely agree!
Translated · Show originalShow translation