For Her (Eau de Toilette) by Narciso Rodriguez

For Her 2003 Eau de Toilette

Shepilein
11/14/2023 - 07:58 AM
10
Very helpful Review
8Scent 8Longevity 7Sillage 9Bottle 7Pricing

Charm from the Past

Better late than never! Somehow, I had overlooked the black bottle so far, as I always reached for Poudree or Musc Noir Rose. Unfortunately, I find the fragrances from Narciso Rodriguez to be quite similar. I always thought that if you have one or two, you don’t necessarily need another one from the line.

Recently, I received a sample of this fragrance and tried it out. It was actually the first scent in the entire line that was not crafted in exactly the same pattern as the others. For me, it has a slightly older touch, but definitely in a good way. Upon spraying, you immediately notice that it is floral. But Osmanthus is truly something unique. This is not your typical floral scent. It smells more like a velvety flower, where you can’t quite tell what type of bloom it is. Somewhat bitter, woody, a bit peachy. And then comes this patchouli scent, which for me is the epitome of vintage. The whole thing is enveloped in amber and musk, giving it that freshness and bitterness. These notes blur the floral scent. It’s as if the lens of a camera is out of focus. A retro blend that doesn’t clearly reveal what you are actually smelling.

Because this perfume has such a mysterious, older touch, it definitely has charm. So far, it seems to be particularly well-received by older people. A scent that women from the 50s would probably have worn. I must say, it truly captures the spirit of the older generation. For me, it is a fragrance that is definitely a classic and will remain so.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
4 Comments
RosesforeverRosesforever 2 years ago
4
I'm shocked now. The scent is older and for women over 50? I find it completely timeless. It's clean and sexy at the same time. This fragrance has been around for 20 years; in the 50s, Chanel No. 5 and Tosca were worn. I think "for her" has nothing to do with that; it suits the elegant businesswoman, but definitely not the housewife from the 50s.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PuttchenPuttchen 2 years ago
4
I wear this scent at 46 years old as a housewife and a mom of five, completely without a business... 😉😂
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ShepileinShepilein 2 years ago
1
I actually meant women from the 50s with class and a certain vintage style. Just classic and timeless. Whether it's a businesswoman or a housewife is up to each person to decide ;)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Hasiputz80Hasiputz80 2 years ago
1
I'm shocked now... Businesswomen seem to have a higher status here than housewives...
Translated · Show originalShow translation