Taurus
02/29/2020 - 11:01 AM
19
Top Review
6.5Scent 6Longevity 6Sillage 7.5Bottle

Cash Back

Spring is just around the corner. Very close - within a knock's reach. At least in terms of the meteorological spring, even if one hasn't yet awakened to any spring feelings.

As theoretical as the beginning of spring is, Flash Back is also intended for the budding season. At least it has everything on paper that evokes thoughts of warm, sunny days.

In reality, it looks a bit different. While the opening with the appealing fresh-sour grapefruit note is somewhat successful, a flashback to past spring days just doesn’t quite happen - if anything, it leans more towards the more successful TdH. The equally greenish-sparkling rhubarb can't save it much either.

The culprit is a serious misuse of too many chemical ... uh, synthetic additives, which turn the Granny Smith into an indigestible fruit and make the vetiver appear rather old.

The approach itself may be okay, and I can imagine that the pyramid with more natural or higher-quality ingredients would conjure up a top refresher, but somehow it seems to me that someone has really pulled the cost brake.

Therefore, I wouldn't expect to hear cheerful spring elves humming at the conclusion of Flash Back, but rather the shaggy gray-red zonk. Especially when I consider the price-performance ratio. Some might even think of Cash Back in light of the damned trio of scent, longevity, and sillage.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
14 Comments
Tom27Tom27 6 years ago
Very informative. Apple notes often come across as synthetic in perfumes - so I think I'll skip this one. I'll definitely leave you the Zonk, um, a trophy here.
Best, Tom
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParmaParma 6 years ago
I briefly tested it as a citrus fan, but in the end, like many OS, it had a vibe that felt too uncomfortably artificial for me.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DOCBEDOCBE 6 years ago
Well intended but not well executed. Flash Back in New York is definitely better.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ExUserExUser 6 years ago
Olfactive Studio is one of those overly hyped brand concepts that promise a lot but deliver little to nothing. So far, nothing has come close to impressing me. Sure, synthetic scents at astronomical prices might be clever, but others do it much better.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ErgoproxyErgoproxy 6 years ago
I couldn't make anything of that.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MeggiMeggi 6 years ago
It was too chemical for me as well.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Can777Can777 6 years ago
It didn't convince me either, but there's still plenty of time to find a new spring-summer candidate. I've already found mine!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
YataganYatagan 6 years ago
I think I would rate it under 7 right now as well. For spring: I was just on my way back from Wetterau, and my windshield wipers almost gave up on the highest setting. :D
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchatzSucherSchatzSucher 6 years ago
The scent didn't leave a special impression on me either. Apple often comes off too baked-sweet in fragrances. There are nicer scents for spring. But it better starts soon, or we'll end up with webbed feet! ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Melisse2Melisse2 6 years ago
Let's treat ourselves to a different perfume for spring fragrance.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
KovexKovex 6 years ago
I'm usually out when it comes to apple anyway. And the rest sounds pretty disappointing too. Thanks for the warning.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PinkdawnPinkdawn 6 years ago
Too bad, something more interesting could have come out of that. By the way: I just went shopping, and you can't tell it's spring in Vienna yet. But I’ve already picked up some scents for the warmer season.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Fresh21Fresh21 6 years ago
Ha, a comment with perfect timing. I was just looking into the scent recently, but I held off. And now even more so, after your great comment and 95€/50 ml. Zonk trophy :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PollitaPollita 6 years ago
I'm always cautious with apple scents. They often tend to go in that typical shampoo direction, which I really don't like. This one seems to be one of those too.
Translated · Show originalShow translation