L'Homme by Prada

L'Homme 2016

FLUidENTITY
01/07/2017 - 06:28 PM
13
5Scent 6Longevity 5Sillage 7Bottle

Self-betrayal

Prada approached L`Homme more from Dior's perspective than from its own, relying on the Prada virtues and values.

Prada has always been famous for its powdery iris. Not least, Infusion d`Homme and Infusion d`Iris stem from Daniela Andrier's artistic understanding. Now, Prada has taken on the sweet variant, and has consequently (inevitably) slipped into the Dior Homme track. Well, nothing new. If one were to list and reflect on the Dior Homme variations, one could fill libraries with them.

Somehow, I find the story around Prada L´Homme extraordinarily unfortunate. Daniela Andrier, who always conjured up powdery-fresh iris scents, must admit here that the sweet powdery iris variant is actually already overdone. Now Prada is merely jumping on a train that has long since left the station. And this, I sadly feel, makes all the old Prada masterpieces unnecessarily look outdated, as a simply sweet powdery iris now simply feels out of fashion, absolutely "copied" and almost denies its own perspectives from the past. I would have preferred a leather iris, a saffron iris, an amyris iris, or something more unusual, but not a sweet Dior iris.

Yes, the scent is stable and nothing was done wrong, a go-to that always flatters.

Yes, it is finely crafted.

No, the projection is not as desired.

Njein, the longevity is okay, but soon only a skin scent.

Yes, L´H is ultimately very, very harmless.

No, I will not buy it.

Yes, it is true, patchouli is starving.

No, neroli is not enough to sufficiently serve and maintain the Prada virtues.

Yes, it is somewhat cooler than Dior Homme.

No, the floral component is not pure iris. However, this is a weak consolation.

No, it does not come close to Dior.

Yes, it is more modern and streamlined than its French counterpart.

Njein, L´H does not really have any recognizability.

Yes, it is in a way "lighter" than the big brother from Dior.

Yes, it is in a way "thinner" than its French brother.

Yes, it gets lost among all the Dior Homme variations.

Yes, Dior Homme has been further diluted.

No, the base is not as sweet as one might assume, and is also absolutely meager.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
8 Comments
Swedax94Swedax94 8 years ago
I don't understand the constant comparisons to Dior. Personally, this composition belongs to a different genre. Dior is way too intense for an open office, and it has a different scent progression.

Dior is great for young people, especially at parties (but it runs the risk of being a mainstream scent). And Prada is better suited for office life.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Honk1510Honk1510 9 years ago
You can definitely notice differences compared to Dior. But I wouldn't need either, since the basic principle is the same. Valentino, Dior, Prada... I think one is enough.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ExUserExUser 9 years ago
I don't see this scent as a Dior Homme knockoff at all. Dior Homme is aromatic and leathery, leaning towards a fougère with its lavender. This one is soapy, powdery, and subtle. Dior Homme is classically masculine, while Prada's scent is more androgynous in the usual Prada style. I think this fragrance is well-made, even if it's not quite in line with what I wear or would wear.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ZereangelZereangel 9 years ago
Hm, what should the interested reader take away from this description? That it resembles Dior Homme but isn't as great, hence the 50% rating? Or that sweet powdery iris combos aren't that good, but this one isn't too sweet? Or that perfumers borrow notes from other fragrances, which limits them to a 50% rating? I don't know. I think the scent is definitely worth 80% and is well-received. Don’t take it personally, but I just don’t think this comment deserves a 50%.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
NordseeNordsee 9 years ago
The content of your description is accurate.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MarkRipleyMarkRipley 9 years ago
1
These trends and imitations are quite curious: In the past, many people smelled similar because they used the same designer perfume, and now many smell alike again, even though they usually wear different designer perfumes :-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TownsendTownsend 9 years ago
If self-betrayal results in such a beautiful scent like L'homme, Prada can betray itself more often! ;-)
(Please forgive me for rewriting this comment, but the old one had some typos thanks to autocorrect.)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Rookie82Rookie82 9 years ago
Strong comment! Established/good fragrance houses definitely need to measure their new releases against their previous ones or a consistent theme. However, if it consistently feels like they're just trying to jump on a bandwagon that's already reached its final stop, that's just weak.
Translated · Show originalShow translation