Even the more controversial and sometimes unjustly hyped Tom Fords usually give me something. Not to mention the classics like “Noir de Noir” or “Tuscan Leather,” without which I certainly would not be who I am olfactorily. Everything is a bit overpriced, no matter how grand the scent. But often enough, they are also milestones and trendsetters. Unfortunately, I cannot place “Fleur de Portofino” in this high rank, not even with good will. And that in both senses, because personally, I don’t like its style, and I also don’t find it outstanding, as objectively as possible. Good, but no more.
“Fleur de Portofino” is a truly blue, watery, vaguely defined flower. Most closely, I smell a transparent, honey-laden acacia. Possibly really on the famous Italian luxury coast. A pond scent for the upper echelons. Harshly put. It is high-class, it does not miss its theme, quite the opposite. But in the depths of my heart, I have to say no to it. No matter the price. A double no to its price. Noble trip in a coupe. Sunscreen vibes. However, for those who enjoy a clear blue floral and have enough cash in their wallet and possibly are female - they can take a sniff here. For the rest, there are better alternatives. For example, “Insense” by Givenchy for the gentlemen of creation. Although that one is probably similarly expensive by now…
Bottle: very fitting color this time for the scent
Sillage: assertive little flower
Longevity: 4 hours - could be a good bit more
Conclusion: not my cup of tea… seawater? A light blue floral blazer made of top material, but it simply doesn’t suit me.
Leimbacher 3 years ago
Floyd 3 years ago