Log in

Create Account Forgot your Password?
Palonera
02/08/2023, 12:24 PM
2.5Scent 9Longevity 7Sillage
Top Review 38

Maybe it is...

...from another star, the second fragrance from the house of Testament London, which I, thanks to Modesty, get to test.
Maybe it is not intended, not made for terrestrial noses at all.
Perhaps "Cosmology" turns to entirely different spheres, fundamentally different from ours, whose inhabitants dress differently, eat differently, move differently, and probably also smell differently than we do.
Maybe.
Only Mr. Matos, Miguel Matos, the creative nose of the company, which is still young and ambitious and first appeared on my radar last summer with "Longevity," knows for sure.
And it turned my head a bit, because "Longevity" is a paragon of sympathy, a luscious, sensual lure that was a pleasure to wear and test.
I was sure that "Cosmology" would be no different - anticipating further delights, I first spritzed it on my skin in late autumn...

...and felt catapulted back to 2013, to my encounter with the terrible orchid, with which Josh Meyer indelibly burned himself and the Imaginary Authors into my memory.
Although the pyramids show little in common, "Cosmology" and "L'Orchidée Terrible" seem to be siblings in spirit - in the spirit of the cellar, to be precise.
Here and there, indistinct aldehydes dominate, not quite fresh floral and fruity notes - similar to those in Tom Ford's "Black Orchid" - and a rather unpleasant alcoholic base, which, unlike in "Longevity," does not leave a pleasurable impression but reminds me of the cellar spirits of the Meyers.
These are not pleasant associations, and to dispel them, I have repeatedly tested it over months, hoping to gain more enjoyable images and impressions, ultimately to draw a more positive conclusion.
Unfortunately - and I truly mean unfortunately! - our encounters always followed the same pattern, sometimes more aldehydic, sometimes slightly fruitier, yet always sadly ending in my memories of petty bourgeois drinking parties in the 1970s of the last century.
This must have caused misunderstandings more often than not, just as "L'Orchidée Terrible" did to me many years ago - here and there, some noses wrinkled, an embrace was shorter, a probing look longer, two- and four-legged housemates kept a dutiful distance, and my overall feeling was generally not so great.
Oh dear.
And once again: oh dear.

I almost feel sorry for the little "Cosmology," especially since it seems, as I see, that it does not have many friends.
Yet surely, the good Señor Matos had something in mind with its creation, the apparently so misunderstood one.
Just the naming alone shows thoughtful planning - and so the circle closes for me: Perhaps the perfumer is far ahead of us, and has his gaze set on infinite expanses, on untapped markets that lie far, far in the future or simply in another galaxy.
There, where "Cosmology" will celebrate resounding triumphs, someday, perhaps even tomorrow.
Who knows...?
Updated on 02/09/2023
Translated · Show originalShow translation
22 Comments
Moni43Moni43 3 years ago
Gladly read, a mental delight.
The scent has come off well.
Respect.
I tip my inner hat to you, dear.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SetaSeta 3 years ago
Not everyone has to like or understand everything.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Medusa00Medusa00 3 years ago
Sometimes I wonder if the creators actually wear the stuff they unleash on humanity.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchalkerinSchalkerin 3 years ago
Good to know. That one won't be on my skin. Great review!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 3 years ago
Very beautifully and thoughtfully described and told! 😊 I've also noticed that there are some scents I just don't "get." Who knows... maybe it will "click" for me someday.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SeeroseSeerose 3 years ago
Oh my goodness, another scent and not a perfume. Once again, a fragrance that really belongs in the Demeter scent library.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
CoraKirschCoraKirsch 3 years ago
What a true art it is: to destroy without a drop of blood being shed. What an empathetic, respectful takedown. Amazing!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
IngerInger 3 years ago
If two-legged and especially four-legged creatures could steer clear of me - then this is definitely not a scent for me. I don't know either of them.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
YostevYostev 3 years ago
Ah, that's how you get roasted! Lower-middle-class drinking parties from the 70s, I know exactly what to expect-it'll probably end sadly. Cheers and toasting!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
YataganYatagan 3 years ago
Thank you for your honest and clear words! I had no idea they were by Matos, but not everything that glitters is gold.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ViolettViolett 3 years ago
Great review. 😊 I enjoyed reading it. I remember thinking the scent was... um... rather unsuccessful. Respect for your perseverance in testing it.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GschpusiGschpusi 3 years ago
Great review. But the scent definitely wouldn't be for me.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MarieposaMarieposa 3 years ago
I find it impressive that you even manage to write a potential audience for this concoction that clearly almost knocked you out, you good soul!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ErgoproxyErgoproxy 3 years ago
Funny, why do I feel a bit intrigued now? Because I have a soft spot for stinkers. Well, every now and then. Cara Mia, it's nice to read something from you again.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchatzSucherSchatzSucher 3 years ago
Phew... I’m not surprised by the perfumer at all. Mr. Matos has a knack for very unique and (over)challenging scents. I probably wouldn’t be impressed either. And since the world of fragrances is colorful and vast, let’s stick to the scents that bring us joy.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MonsieurTestMonsieurTest 3 years ago
Oh dear, the scent doesn't sound good at all.
Your review, on the other hand, is quite well put! :-))
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TtfortwoTtfortwo 3 years ago
Ah yes, Parfumo fate... Keep testing, even if it hurts. What must be, must be.
Great review!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Lucy55Lucy55 3 years ago
What a nasty piece… stay away from me!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FrauKirscheFrauKirsche 3 years ago
Scent 2.5 and durability 9
is definitely a bummer :))
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PollitaPollita 3 years ago
I would love to know what the perfumers are thinking sometimes. Just once, to be a little mouse.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 3 years ago
Exactly, maybe we're just not ready for it, and tomorrow is a new day... Or someday... The little one shouldn't lose hope 😉
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SalanderSalander 3 years ago
Great description for an unsympathetic scent. Try it? No, thanks! ;)
Translated · Show originalShow translation