Log in

Create Account Forgot your Password?
Schoeibksr
05/11/2024, 05:19 AM
6Scent 8Longevity 7Sillage
Here, the report for the Fougère Guild, in the form of a longer statement:
Lavender beautifully herbal & refreshed by…*
41 42
Translated · Show originalShow translation
42 Comments
RobbenbingoRobbenbingo 2 years ago
1
Hmm, interesting. Does the scent then completely turn sweet, or does the lavender still linger all the way to the base? I’m not sure how I feel about that if the herb just disappears completely.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
RobbenbingoRobbenbingo 2 years ago
1
Okay. Clear case. I'm turning away from this. I actually find the modernization idea quite charming. I had hoped that the herbal and gourmand notes would be interestingly intertwined. Thanks for your enlightening exploration.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchoeibksrSchoeibksr 2 years ago
Loses its fougère character in the base and then just becomes synthetic sweetness.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SonarIDSonarID 2 years ago
1
He couldn't quite make up his mind.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
JonasP1JonasP1 2 years ago
1
If you set aside the scent notes, it sounds quite nice.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Danny264Danny264 2 years ago
1
sounds pretty good...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MidnightsMidnights 2 years ago
1
Great description below!
Well, anyone who sticks a superlative in the name has to live up to it. Others have already failed with smaller claims.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Steffi92Steffi92 2 years ago
1
Sounds unappealing to me.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TherisTheris 2 years ago
1
Sweet buttery sandalwood in a fougère? I'd rather not.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
BanelingBaneling 2 years ago
1
Thanks for your report. Not so sexy.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchalkerinSchalkerin 2 years ago
1
I'm curious to see what it's like.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ElAttarineElAttarine 2 years ago
1
I can only agree with @Jeob...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
JeobJeob 2 years ago
1
In my experience, fragrances with "sex" or "sexy" in the name often end up being a letdown, as the expectations are usually more vibrant than the actual potential of the scent.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SeejungfrauSeejungfrau 2 years ago
1
Definitely nice to others.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Stella73Stella73 2 years ago
1
As feared.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MrtangiersMrtangiers 2 years ago
1
With fougères, I rarely have issues with sweetness, but I really struggle with creaminess. There's hardly anything worse than when the beautifully fresh lavender opening gets smothered and powdered by the tonka.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Konst121Konst121 2 years ago
1
Due to the name, it made it onto my wishlist too :D Let's see if I'll be similarly "enthusiastic."
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TofuwachtelTofuwachtel 2 years ago
1
I miss the classic touch.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
YataganYatagan 2 years ago
2
Thanks for your detailed report! I was actually interested, but now I'm a bit skeptical.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 2 years ago
1
You have to check it out.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ChipsySoulChipsySoul 2 years ago
1
Another tonka bean scent again...?
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GoldGold 2 years ago
1
Starts off nicely, but ends in modern mediocrity... luckily, we all have different interpretations of "sexy." Creamy & sweet are more like deal-breakers for me...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SalvaSalva 2 years ago
2
Great description below, very helpful!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ExUserExUser 2 years ago
1
I'd rather stay away from that.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
BosworthBosworth 2 years ago
1
The name probably isn't the point.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TonyTonkaTonyTonka 2 years ago
1
Synthetic doesn't have to be 😕
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TonyTonkaTonyTonka 2 years ago
1
Understandable, it probably wouldn't be my thing either...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchoeibksrSchoeibksr 2 years ago
1
The synthetic woods aren't even the problem for me; it's more the tonka bean sweetness that feels too much in the base and ruins the enjoyment.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
CfrCfr 2 years ago
1
Not really a pleasure, but definitely not bad for going out :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DuftgroupieDuftgroupie 2 years ago
1
😳😱 Oh dear……………… 😱😱
Translated · Show originalShow translation
VeritasAUTVeritasAUT 2 years ago
1
Thanks for the statement, that saves me the test :D
Translated · Show originalShow translation
VerbenaVerbena 2 years ago
1
Seriously... why is there no review?
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchoeibksrSchoeibksr 2 years ago
Look at how long my actual reviews are; the scent just didn't offer much. 😉
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 2 years ago
1
Another case of "sex sells".... but it will definitely find its fans.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MuckiMangoMuckiMango 2 years ago
1
Amen :) I can only agree, I expected more/different from it too.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FrauKirscheFrauKirsche 2 years ago
1
...as if it's the "sexiest"! 😄
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PinseltownPinseltown 2 years ago
1
I love Fougère, but this one doesn't really draw me in...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FloydFloyd 2 years ago
1
You clearly don't find him sexy, do you? ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GurkenRickGurkenRick 2 years ago
1
I might like it if the synthetic notes weren't so prominent 😅
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchoeibksrSchoeibksr 2 years ago
12
Citrusy bergamot, good opening, but quickly a sweet creaminess emerges behind it. It actually has a buttery quality reminiscent of sandalwood, but it could also be a mix of vanillin and musk. The gourmand sweetness isn't as pronounced as I initially feared.
Later, ambroxan (and other synthetic woody notes) come through quite distinctly, adding a spicy-woody element alongside the sweet creaminess.
For me, it’s not particularly sexy on a man, as I don’t associate sweet and creamy scents with men. However, this one might appeal more to women than the really old-school, harsh fougères, which usually annoy young women with their sharp, aftershave-like notes. I find it not fresh enough in the base due to the sweet notes, but that was also the goal of the fragrance-to modernize it. Well, to each their own.
Thanks to Babylon84 🙏🏼
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GoldGold 2 years ago
1
Sweet and man - not for me. I can hardly stand sweet scents as it is... and then on a man... just not attractive to me. Creamy, by the way, isn't appealing either... 😜
Translated · Show originalShow translation
KäseKäse 2 years ago
1
Men can smell sweet and creamy for me, but then it's just not a Fougère.
Translated · Show originalShow translation