Log in

Create Account Forgot your Password?
DaveGahan101
08/06/2017 - 07:27 AM
17
Top Review
7.5Scent 6Longevity 6Sillage 8Bottle

Like a wine tasting..

...one should ideally test perfumes in the early morning/forenoon, as palate, nose, and tongue are still unburdened. Said..done! Yesterday at Breuninger, I was quite surprised to encounter Pura, as I had been told two weeks prior that it would only be released in September. It wasn't even prominently displayed on a special presentation tray, but rather inconspicuously next to the cash register. The joy was even greater that it was already available for purchase and not just for testing purposes. Sprayed a little, took a city tour, bought it:-)!
I have done 3 test rounds so far, and today's test deviates a bit from the others.
But let's go in order...
Colonia Pura starts extremely fresh and zesty, freshly squeezed lemon with a splash of orange. It's fresher and more citrusy than all the Colonias combined. Wow.. I wouldn't have necessarily expected that from the listed notes. You immediately know you have THE Colonia - the original - under your nose, fresh, tart, and typically masculine. This is exactly the difference for me compared to many Atelier Cologne scents, which are "only" the world champions of top notes; a contrast, a (masculine) counterpart is often missing, they are often one-dimensional (still often smell good!). The original Colonia is immediately "there," and yet the scent feels new, fresh, modern, and somehow clean.. maybe that's what "Pura" is meant to convey!? Clean not in the sense of dirty, but tidy, slim, transparent, and each individual note can be clearly detected, except for coriander. Green stuff from the herb kitchen, yes, but coriander.. no idea, doesn't matter.
In the extremely muggy 30 degrees yesterday, only the citrus notes came to the fore during the first two tests, along with the slightly soapy-creamy musk base. This morning, for the first time, I picked up the flowers and a hint of sweetness. Mainly, I could recognize the enchanting jasmine, which is often difficult in men's fragrances because it takes on a feminine direction, but not here. Even the Hermes-worthy Narcisse can't change that. Well dosed and still thoroughly a men's fragrance, but certainly wearable by women, although it will probably still be too tart for many.
The fragrance passes through the individual phases at a gallop; after 30 minutes, you've experienced everything. The highlights for me are clearly the top note and the even more beautiful floral heart note, as the scent has a certain depth in this phase. The patchouli in the base can be neglected; it's more of a hint than something that gives the fragrance a base or foundation.
Even though Pura isn't extremely different (except for the mono-club), I like it best with the original and it can still be wonderfully worn for the next 4-6 weeks; I find it a bit too refined for autumn and winter. It is the same yet so different from its brothers. Those who own the others probably don't need to have this one. If Colonia was too old-school for you, you might find joy in this one.
Longevity and sillage are Colonia-like. I do not regret the purchase; however, the fragrance came to market 2-3 months too late, like Cedro di Taormina back then, as it is a perfect spring and summer scent.

A beautiful, fresh variant and facet from the original classic theme, which is absolutely successful.
Not a must-have, but a very good fragrance!
Updated on 08/06/2017
Translated · Show originalShow translation
11 Comments
PapricaPaprica 8 years ago
@M3000 The Essenza is more woody-aromatic (for AdP standards)... and a bit darker and more modern than the classic. The Pura only shares the top note with the classic for me; after that, it becomes a fresh-soft musk scent with floral-powdery hints. It's an everyday go-to that is definitely unisex.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DaveGahan101DaveGahan101 8 years ago
Hmm.. tricky.. the Essenza is more masculine, richer, while the Pura is more unisex, which the Essenza definitely isn't for me! Essenza is also my favorite and will be joining me soon! :-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
M3000M3000 8 years ago
Structurally, it sounds very much like Colonia Essenza. Could you differentiate between the two? - I see the CE as a successful modernization of the original; despite the many floral notes, it's still masculine and my favorite in the line.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
RobGordonRobGordon 8 years ago
Releasing a cologne in late summer is a bit bold. I think I would prefer it as an EdP based on the description. Thanks, Dave, very informative!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DOCBEDOCBE 8 years ago
Well, that sounds like a must-have for the wishlist.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
AzaharAzahar 8 years ago
That makes me curious. Thank you for the informative comment.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TomDuftTomDuft 8 years ago
Thanks for your review. I have so many other Acqua di Parma fragrances. I'll save this one for next summer. ;)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GerryGerry 8 years ago
Very accurately described, I think. However, it's not a candidate for purchase for me right now, as I still have too many other scents of this kind.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FlankerFlanker 8 years ago
Well, I just wanted to double-check ;)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DaveGahan101DaveGahan101 8 years ago
Haha;-)! No... this cologne just doesn't have chest hair (at least not in an 80s style), which is probably why I like it so much;-)!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FlankerFlanker 8 years ago
1. Why does the "Report" button on the smartphone interface have to be right under the "Helpful" button?! (I just reversed that again ;))

2. Thanks for the informative comment! These classic colognes always remind me of fake chest hair^^, but I will test it out someday anyway.
Translated · Show originalShow translation