Log in

L'Aventure Knight by Al Haramain

L'Aventure Knight

Michael1979
03/16/2023 - 07:05 PM
13
Helpful Review
10Scent 9Longevity 9Sillage 10Bottle 10Pricing

Cool Water, Green Irish Tweed, LAventure Knight Comparison

Well, I've known Cool Water forever; it's a classic. The current batches are not comparable to those from the late 80s to early 90s. Now it's just an everyday cheapie, whereas 30 years ago it was the luxury of a little boy's pocket money, and back then it was the benchmark for me. I don't know what it is or was, but there was something in it back then that made it quite special.

What Cool Water has over the other two is that it is fully accessible at every stage and doesn't have any phases where it seems a little odd, unlike the other two. It is indeed quite present, but if you're looking for a fresh scent that is not just average for a fresh fragrance but lasts up to 6 hours instead of just 4, you won't be happy with Cool Water or will need to reapply.
But after having the other two under my nose, I almost think that the barely sufficient presence applies not only to CW but also to GIT. I am now of the opinion that only the Knight delivers the strongest performance throughout the day.

Now, about the other two candidates. I encountered the Knight before the GIT and actually thought, well, with the price difference, the GIT must be a whole different ballgame, but I was taught otherwise, and it turned out as it usually does with the Creeds for me. High price, big fuss, and in the end, the realization that Creed or the Creeds are not worthless, but not worth all that money. I even speculate that if I had been presented with both blind for the first time, I would have guessed them the wrong way around.

Now to another point that distinguishes them from CW but behaves contrarily when viewed alone. As mentioned, CW is continuously accessible without having phases in its progression that are too synthetic for my taste. Objectively definitely, but still not to my liking.
The Knight is a bit synthetic at first, but that fades over time, and it presents itself extraordinarily beautifully in the end for my taste.
The GIT, on the other hand, initially seems like pure luxury, only to prove too boring as it develops. I also sniffed with my neighbor today and discussed these last two points with her. To confirm my impression, she perceived it exactly the same way, and she is not someone who blindly confirms others' judgments without her own impression.

The biggest flaw of GIT became apparent to me during the evening. The Knight was still fully present, but where did the GIT go? I even go so far as to say that the Knight and GIT are not equally strong, and Cool Water is a bit behind; rather, the Knight clearly holds the top position, and GIT falls back to third place behind Cool Water. If one wants to consider the opinion of the masses as objective compared to the opinion of the individual, I might be wrong, but my personal impression is just that. To confirm my view, I also found in the statements about GIT the voice of a colleague who describes the GIT as too weak in presence. From the lovely CW feeling that the Knight also has, I felt nothing at all with GIT. All in all, I would place CW alongside Knight on a high pedestal, but mercilessly let GIT fall behind. And not just because I might think that GIT must have a performance for the price that surpasses the others by miles; no, even if all three were offered at the same price, I would only buy CW and Knight, while I would mercilessly leave GIT on the shelf.

Now I am curious about your opinions. Whether you will tear me apart or if you might see it a bit like I do.

Addendum:
About the scent itself: It is less cooling, more of a minimal fruity freshness that is rounded off by the tea and the bitter bergamot found in Earl Grey tea, preventing the fruitiness from becoming too cloying. I see the green notes coming from the violet leaf, where again the bitter bergamot and the tea prevent the violet from becoming too floral. This green fruitiness is most noticeable at the beginning but quickly makes way so that the typical Cool Water feeling can join in, but by no means as strong as in Cool Water itself. As mentioned above, it is not as cooling. Overall, for my taste, it remains fairly consistent until the end. I don't really see the woody-dry finish of Cool Water here.

The original always has the bonus of being the firstborn and the name; a dupe, on the other hand, always has to deliver, otherwise no one cares, no matter if the dupe is actually better and also cheaper, which is clearly the case here.
Updated on 03/18/2023
Translated 路 Show originalShow translation
4 Comments
MariocalMariocal 1 year ago
I can't relate to your review at all. The comparison of Cool Water with Green Irish Tweed is completely inappropriate - the differences between the two are enormous, especially in terms of performance. I find it very questionable that Knight is portrayed as the best of the three fragrances. In my opinion, Green Irish Tweed is clearly number 1.
Translated 路 Show originalShow translation
Fresh21Fresh21 2 years ago
For your great effort, I鈥檒l give you a participation trophy, but really just half of one, because the exact same review can also be found for Cool Water. And considering that you only use "fresh" and "synthetic" to describe the scent in such detail, I鈥檇 have to take that half trophy back 馃槅 Your comparison comment could just as easily apply to a raspberry-leather scent or an overly sweet floral scent... So, it鈥檚 more of a motivational trophy for your next reviews, keyword "what does the scent smell like?" 馃憤
Translated 路 Show originalShow translation
Fresh21Fresh21 2 years ago
Great! Now you've provided an excellent scent description with your addition.
Translated 路 Show originalShow translation
Michael1979Michael1979 2 years ago
Yes, you're right, I'll add an update.
Translated 路 Show originalShow translation