Can the opinion about a perfume be influenced, and thus based on the (dubious) marketing strategy adopted by the company that produces it, or should it be restricted to the quality of the fragrance itself?
As a believer in second sight, I fear that the hatred suffered by Dior Homme 2020 is downright unfair.
The aroma is wonderful, although there is no denying that it is somewhat generic and made to please the masses and earn praise. But, after all, the market has always been permeated by this style. Big industry has never moved away from this commercial appeal. In all eras there have been numerous perfumes of the "common and easy to please" type.
Loaded with vetiver, it has great sustain for at least 7 hours in mild weather and reasonable projection in the first hour and low thereafter.
Finally, I say that, for those who feel it, it is very pleasant, being always commented as great, excellent, etc. Nothing below what I experienced when using other high-profile ones like Sauvage EDT, Prada L'homme and ADG.
