The name would have suited better. It would also have been a small homage to the interesting film adaptation of Stephen King's novel from 1976.
The scent is, like the film, a mix of a light version of a splatter movie and a soft porn in a soft-focus look.
My brother once got this controversial Eau de Toilette for his collection. He also tested it in my presence. However, after the first sniff, I didn't dare to let the stuff touch my own skin.
Since the longevity and sillage are enormous, I still experienced enough of it that evening.
The main note of this Eau de Toilette is really metal. The association with blood came to my mind immediately. This smell of blood that has turned cold. As a child, I witnessed a home slaughter of a pig at my grandparents' house. This very memorable experience came back to me. Even in galvanization and zinc baths, it smells more pleasant than this extravagance. Beneath this metallic note, which is almost ominously dominant from beginning to end, there is a slightly creamy-milky base. However, this little subplot really does not remind me of the smell of any bodily excretions or secretions. So it’s a mix of cold bloodlust and cute naive innocence.
I also wonder who should use something like this and when.
Congratulations to the creator of "Sécrétions Magnifiques." The composition at least does not leave one cold.
It was a very interesting olfactory experience. Once is completely enough for me.
Ginger 13 years ago
Blauemaus 13 years ago