6
Translated
Show original
nice to have
...I find and if it is first only 5ml.
Expectations can be exceeded, met or disappointed. The former and the latter should hardly happen, if you have "asked around" here a little. On the whole, it applies.
The fragrance is an Immergeher, should hardly cause offence since restrained, still perceptible and on the street no one will turn around after you, if you wear this fragrance.
And if so, then it is probably not the fragrance. ;-)
Spicy - woody I find accurate, a pleasant fragrance of the vast majority is certainly perceived so.
Who equates good perfumes (only) with interesting perfumes and interesting only with the products of, for example, Zoologist goes, which is certainly not happy with the fragrance and shuddering turn away whether the "0815" DNA (and do him wrong). And who does not like the EdT already in general, too.
Speaking of DNA. I mean the Boss Bottled DNA is also here to recognize. Only the apple is missing (I know, it is indicated under the top note). So who is the apple in the EdT initially too cheeky, the EdP possibly like better or at all. Still, I wouldn't completely deny it any fruitiness, there it is somewhere, the apple. He is in the middle as well as out the back soft, somehow warm (one must therefore not wait for the winter, perhaps only the Ü30Temperaturen let through), harmoniously halt.
Which ingredient is responsible for this, no idea. I try only to describe how the fragrance smells and not why. And even that I succeed only - well insufficiently (?), at least if someone really never had Boss Bottled under the nose.
I like both, find it also not automatically negative if a fragrance quite many like and is older than months ;-)) For people who just want to smell good, worth a test.
As for H / S I find him perfectly adequate, not better than the original, where I find the H / S in the original and for an eau de toilette already really good.
Whether he absorbs with me? Maybe. I have taken to me, at the earliest when the EdT is all, because both you do not necessarily have to have, but - see above / title...
Expectations can be exceeded, met or disappointed. The former and the latter should hardly happen, if you have "asked around" here a little. On the whole, it applies.
The fragrance is an Immergeher, should hardly cause offence since restrained, still perceptible and on the street no one will turn around after you, if you wear this fragrance.
And if so, then it is probably not the fragrance. ;-)
Spicy - woody I find accurate, a pleasant fragrance of the vast majority is certainly perceived so.
Who equates good perfumes (only) with interesting perfumes and interesting only with the products of, for example, Zoologist goes, which is certainly not happy with the fragrance and shuddering turn away whether the "0815" DNA (and do him wrong). And who does not like the EdT already in general, too.
Speaking of DNA. I mean the Boss Bottled DNA is also here to recognize. Only the apple is missing (I know, it is indicated under the top note). So who is the apple in the EdT initially too cheeky, the EdP possibly like better or at all. Still, I wouldn't completely deny it any fruitiness, there it is somewhere, the apple. He is in the middle as well as out the back soft, somehow warm (one must therefore not wait for the winter, perhaps only the Ü30Temperaturen let through), harmoniously halt.
Which ingredient is responsible for this, no idea. I try only to describe how the fragrance smells and not why. And even that I succeed only - well insufficiently (?), at least if someone really never had Boss Bottled under the nose.
I like both, find it also not automatically negative if a fragrance quite many like and is older than months ;-)) For people who just want to smell good, worth a test.
As for H / S I find him perfectly adequate, not better than the original, where I find the H / S in the original and for an eau de toilette already really good.
Whether he absorbs with me? Maybe. I have taken to me, at the earliest when the EdT is all, because both you do not necessarily have to have, but - see above / title...
1 Comment
Jansi