17
13
Zero resemblance to the 1.Flower. Orange blossom & synthetic biting saffron component. Uninspiring, clichéd, generic. Such a shame.
Translated · Show original
13 Comments
JonasP1 3 years ago
1
Really a shame then.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Gandix 3 years ago
1
I really liked the Urflower.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Gold 3 years ago
I thought it was nice too, so I foolishly sprayed the sample of the "new" one all over myself, and it was completely off. I had to throw all my clothes in the wash and scrub my skin. I don't like that synthetic stuff...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Floyd 3 years ago
1
Yawn.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Heikeso 3 years ago
1
Orange blossom... not my thing at all. No need to test it.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Axiomatic 3 years ago
1
100% destruction of an old fragrance, once again.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Gold 3 years ago
Since the launch of Flower EdP in 2000, 29 flankers have been released!!! But this one definitely needed its own name. It's a completely standalone fragrance.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Pluto 3 years ago
1
Quick flanker for quick cash...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Pinseltown 3 years ago
1
Too bad, it doesn't seem to hold a candle to the other Flowers...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
NuiWhakakore 3 years ago
1
The original sacrificed on the altar of profit maximization...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Salva 3 years ago
1
Seems like a disappointment, although the brand usually has good fragrances.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Helena1411 3 years ago
1
So, a typical flanker that you don't really need to bother with.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Gold 3 years ago
Here, only the name is a constant; the scent is completely different and has nothing to do with the old Flower. Very misleading.
Translated · Show originalShow translation