Ruffles Oscar de la Renta 1983 Eau de Toilette
17
Top Review
First a grand gown, then a cozy house suit
Ruffles is a typical scent of its time. An opulent representative of the 80s, and I think anyone who loves glamorous fragrances would enjoy it. I became acquainted with it through an auctioned mini, which fortunately still has a completely intact content. Given its age and the small amount, one wouldn't expect that, but this time it worked out again.
At first, I thought: Oh, a floral chypre. Elegant, not sweet in the opening, which reveals its floral heart rather thoughtfully but powerfully. It's pointless to try to identify every flower. Up to that point, the scent reminds me of all the glamorous perfumes that hit the market during that time, like Knowing, Coco, Gem, Diva, or similar. It's nice to have them in the collection, but I often lack an appropriate occasion to wear them. They need a grand setting, a stage, to truly shine; otherwise, I would quickly feel overdressed.
However, where the aforementioned examples often showcase a pronounced oakmoss base, Ruffles surprisingly comes across as cozy and inviting in the dry down. Thankfully, despite the honey and caramel, it is not sweet, but has a distinctly animalistic cuddly factor. The perfume doesn't make a grand statement as I would have expected. Ruffles doesn't escalate through the scent progression but rather barges in through the front door, only to then settle comfortably in the corner of the sofa, and one wouldn't really want to be alone with it. Now the scent feels less glamorous and more private, though certainly only if one feels comfortable with the hint of civet that allows the fragrance to fade in such an animalistic-cuddly manner.
Ruffles belongs to a generation of fragrances that would probably have no chance in today's market. All the more, I am glad to be able to get to know it, as it has never crossed my path in my fragrant professional life.
At first, I thought: Oh, a floral chypre. Elegant, not sweet in the opening, which reveals its floral heart rather thoughtfully but powerfully. It's pointless to try to identify every flower. Up to that point, the scent reminds me of all the glamorous perfumes that hit the market during that time, like Knowing, Coco, Gem, Diva, or similar. It's nice to have them in the collection, but I often lack an appropriate occasion to wear them. They need a grand setting, a stage, to truly shine; otherwise, I would quickly feel overdressed.
However, where the aforementioned examples often showcase a pronounced oakmoss base, Ruffles surprisingly comes across as cozy and inviting in the dry down. Thankfully, despite the honey and caramel, it is not sweet, but has a distinctly animalistic cuddly factor. The perfume doesn't make a grand statement as I would have expected. Ruffles doesn't escalate through the scent progression but rather barges in through the front door, only to then settle comfortably in the corner of the sofa, and one wouldn't really want to be alone with it. Now the scent feels less glamorous and more private, though certainly only if one feels comfortable with the hint of civet that allows the fragrance to fade in such an animalistic-cuddly manner.
Ruffles belongs to a generation of fragrances that would probably have no chance in today's market. All the more, I am glad to be able to get to know it, as it has never crossed my path in my fragrant professional life.
Translated · Show original
9 Comments
Palonera 12 years ago
You've found another gem! I hope I get the chance to experience this Oscar too - the other creations I know from him have really impressed me.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Callas 12 years ago
I had the scent as a mini ages ago. Thanks for the reminder ;)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Ginger 12 years ago
As always, it's described in a way that makes you able to imagine it, even though you've never smelled it.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Florblanca 12 years ago
Finally a comment about this fragrance. I really wanted to know what it smells like. Great description, thank you! ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Zora 12 years ago
Great comment. Without civet, it would have fit perfectly into my preferences.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Duftstick 12 years ago
Great comment about a very lovely scent. Hats off to you!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Yatagan 12 years ago
Interesting. Even though I'm quite familiar with 80s fragrances, the name doesn't even ring a bell.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Seerose 12 years ago
@Ergo: Ask the horse lovers. There's no more beautiful animal scent than that of horses in the pasture, and then the hairless areas over their nostrils, and the coat! I think Turandot must have experienced something similar with the civet note.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Ergoproxy 12 years ago
Animalistic cuddle factor? I haven't smelled that one yet either.
Translated · Show originalShow translation

