Quattroventi - Maestrale by Paolo Gigli

Quattroventi - Maestrale 2008

Meggi
05/28/2017 - 03:02 PM
23
Top Review
6.5Scent 8Longevity 7Sillage 8Bottle

Two and a Half Candy Attempts

The opening of Maestrale has a toffee-like, almost liqueur quality. It takes a little while for other ingredients to make their presence known. Mandarin is fine, its juicy fruit sweetness is initially a bit jarring in this context. Then I catch a whiff of a white floral nuance, and finally, a soapy, foamy twist develops in the background. Together, this comes off as extraordinarily strange. By no means bad, after a few minutes it becomes rather pleasant. But indeed strange.

Picking out such details is certainly a bit of a challenge, as everything seems to be closely packed together. I should probably just broadly summarize it as "mild-floral fruit, subtly spicy-clean undertones." Curiously, the blend becomes increasingly candy-like as the morning progresses.

So - the one and a half attempt (the toffee from above only counts as half):
“Gooooons exclusive - our original Kräuterbonbons de Grasse. Avec ordentlisch lavender. And a tiny bit of white flowers. A drop of fruit must not be missing.”
“Who invented that?” comes the reply. It smells, maliciously sharpened, like Ricola with clean lavender. Nevertheless, the tension between candy-like floral and foamy-clean is quite charming.

By lunchtime, the mixture undergoes a fundamental transformation, becoming straightforwardly sweeter, as if - second candy attempt - more and more creaminess is sneaking in. Fortunately, not pure, no, help arrives: The rock rose provides a saving twist into the oriental. Again, this can at least be described as somewhat original.

After six or seven hours, a blend of vanilla-like, if you will, amber develops, at least directly on the skin, along with otherwise more labdanum-ambery aromas. Overall, a somewhat conventional sweet-creamy mixture is created, which, however, deserves credit for a) not smelling like sweetened whipped cream and b) not unfolding a dull, synthetic, trumpet-like aroma. In fact, the whole thing remains somewhat varied: Occasionally, small remnants of floral or white floral nature flash by, almost pronounced near the skin, bordering on the stinky. Then again, reminiscences of a spicy nature waft past or one can sense characterful resinous splashes. At the very end, in the evening, vanilla-like let’s-call-it-amber dominates.

Friends of such soft-balsamic scents with a slight edge might enjoy this Gigli creation. Personally, Maestrale does not sweep me off my feet; I simply do not understand what it really wants. And what all this has to do with the supposedly cool wind of the same name, I frankly do not understand at all. I find nothing cool about it; on the contrary. [In the meantime, I have been informed by Yalla, the donor of the sample (thank you very much!), that said wind can indeed deliver sweet warmth. Aha!]

Regarding the irritation that the relationship between purchase price and what is offered has caused among my two previous commentators, I can report that the virtual store, whose “i” recently shifted from the front to the middle, already offered the fragrance for under a hundred euros. That might fit better now - the mentioned roughly 200 was indeed a bit ambitious.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
14 Comments
Sweetsmell75Sweetsmell75 8 years ago
So, nothing you need to know? :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GerdiGerdi 8 years ago
Ugh... Creamy candy only in the mouth and not on the wrist!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
YataganYatagan 8 years ago
I thought it was quite nice, but I found the other Maetrale (from PdP) much better (but I know you don't like that one either).
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ErnstheiterErnstheiter 8 years ago
At least I think the bottle is nice :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MisterEMisterE 8 years ago
You probably need it about as much as mulled wine in July.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ErgreifendErgreifend 8 years ago
Absolutely not my thing. No. No. You were very generous with the ratings. Just like Ergoproxy, I don't see myself in any of these scents.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ErgoproxyErgoproxy 8 years ago
That's just a brand I can't really connect with.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
JumiJumi 8 years ago
Sometimes I don't really know what I want either :) But I'm pretty sure about this one - I don't want this :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PaloneraPalonera 8 years ago
You can probably attribute a certain stubbornness to all Paolo Gigli fragrances - unfortunately, they usually come with a price tag as well. However, they've been available in stores with the "i" - now in the middle - for quite some time at very reasonable prices, so sharing is definitely worth it.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MarWicMarWic 8 years ago
I'll pass on that...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GschpusiGschpusi 8 years ago
I do like the Paolo fragrances, but this one... *thinking*
Translated · Show originalShow translation
KleineHexeKleineHexe 8 years ago
Before trying out candy scents, I should consult my trusted dentist. I think I'll skip the test instead.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Can777Can777 8 years ago
Was the test difficult? Tell the truth. I always struggle when testing women's perfumes. As always, you handled it brilliantly.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GelisGelis 8 years ago
Enthusiasm sounds a bit different :).
So I'll give a thumbs up for saving the wishlist.
Translated · Show originalShow translation