Log in

The Writer by St Giles

The Writer 2017

Yatagan
12/19/2021 - 06:32 AM
97
Top Review
8.5Scent 9Longevity 8Sillage 7Bottle 7Pricing

Humunkulus

When Bertrand Duchaufour launches a fragrance, you should take a closer look. After all, he has created legendary scents like Timbuktu and other L'Artisan classics, a series of the most beautiful fragrances from the CdG special editions, exciting recent releases like Chypre Shot, and some Penhaligon's bestsellers. Not everything appeals to me, but almost none of it is flat mainstream; instead, it always shows a bit more courage than the competition, occasionally at the cost of a cumbersome nonconformity.
This might also apply to The Writer, as it has been around since 2017, but even on Parfumo, where niche enthusiasts gather, there are only 30 reviews and so far just one (excellent) comment. What is the reason for this?
The fragrance opens in an idiosyncratic way, develops idiosyncratically, and has an idiosyncratic drydown. This requires chutzpah, both from the manufacturer and the perfumer.

Much of it reminds one of great fragrances from past decades, especially the 70s and 80s, when strong scent notes were in vogue, aldehydes shimmered, and animalic or amber-leathery accents could not be strong enough. Nostalgic references are skillfully combined with new and daring ideas. A humunkulus escapes from the distillation flask: new and familiar at the same time. The ginger opening can be found (albeit more subdued) in Sagamore Eau de Toilette, Monsieur Balmain (1964) Eau de Toilette, Pour Monsieur Eau de Toilette, or the old formula of Versace L'Homme Eau de Toilette. The combination of incense with a fruity note (here: rhubarb) was a hallmark of Timbuktu. Aldehydes, on the other hand, can be found in so many fragrances from the past that listing them would be exhausting; as a reference for a soap-like aldehyde scent of the 80s, I will only mention Pour Lui Eau de Toilette here. Why do I predominantly list men's fragrances? Although The Writer is categorized as a unisex scent, it strikes me as so distinctly masculine that I can more easily imagine it on a man than on a woman. Moreover, it follows the patterns of classic men's fragrance tradition in my opinion: neither floral nor soft or sweet notes, but rather aromatic, somewhat sharp (thus reminiscent of aftershave), distinct, and spicy.
As noted by NuiWhakakore, the fragrance becomes more animalic with increasing wear, certainly due to the development of castoreum. This is also a scent component that enjoyed great popularity in the 70s and 80s: Antaeus Eau de Toilette, Man Pure Eau de Toilette, "New-York | Parfums de Nicolaï" can serve as sufficient examples, even though they have since been discontinued or adapted to contemporary tastes.

The mention of nostalgia might suggest that the fragrance is thoroughly nostalgic, but The Writer would not be a Duchaufour scent if it did not also contain cleverly innovative components: This includes the aforementioned rhubarb, which was completely unusual until the 90s, as well as the synthetic soft leather note, which could not be produced in that way before, but was composed of resinous, amber, and animalic notes (civet, castoreum). As little as I like this postmodern tone, it integrates successfully into the overall artwork here.

One last thing: The fragrance needs time. It develops slowly and must not be over-applied, as it can be overwhelming. For me, a single, sparing spray is sufficient. The St. Giles brand, in any case, must be kept on the radar. Alongside The Writer, The Tycoon also impresses across the board.
Updated on 12/19/2021
Translated · Show originalShow translation
53 Comments
GoldGold 4 years ago
Duchaufour has it tough with me... but I love the name of the fragrance.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ToppineToppine 4 years ago
This is another top-notch Yatagan comment... Wonderful that you're writing again, thank you! I only know Pour Monsieur from the comparison scents, but that's not what matters. You've captured the essence of Duchaufour, sometimes tangentially, but never trivial.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FioreMarinaFioreMarina 4 years ago
I enjoyed reading it, learned a lot, and felt well entertained. Excellent.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ZoraZora 4 years ago
The scent seems very interesting and piques my curiosity, as long as it's not too similar to Timbuktu. It would be something for my better half. Great and very informative review.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Sommer2014Sommer2014 4 years ago
Very interesting scent description, I'm curious now.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Conchi2019Conchi2019 4 years ago
Once again, a very enjoyable review.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Brelles530Brelles530 4 years ago
3
A great review of a very interesting fragrance. Congratulations!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
AugustoAugusto 4 years ago
1
The carefully selected reference scents you've chosen, combined with Duchaufour's refinement, make this little gem a must-try for Augusto!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DuesenduftDuesenduft 4 years ago
Great description of a pretty awesome golem. Besides The Tycoon, this is the other option from St. Giles. I can't really get along with the other variants. But these two showcase what D. is capable of. Not for everyone, but bold all the way. Anti-mainstream trophy!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MCPSMCPS 4 years ago
2
Thank you very much for this meaningful, nuanced, and informative description that sparks curiosity. Happy holidays and a great start to the new year!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
HektorHektor 4 years ago
1
Enjoyed reading this. I happen to have a sample of it at home... but I haven't tested it yet, as Duchaufour usually isn't to my taste. But I guess I’ll have to give it a try now. :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ViolettViolett 4 years ago
1
Writer is indeed a fascinating, vibrant fragrance experience. I agree, it's a men's scent. Thanks for the detailed analysis.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchalkerinSchalkerin 4 years ago
1
Very informative and very exciting.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DuftJunkieDuftJunkie 4 years ago
1
Soft (aniline or nappa) leather like in Antaeus? And Kyoto as a similar scent? Duchaufour could really make me broke 🙄.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
0815abc0815abc 4 years ago
Very nice comment. Driftwood trophy.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 4 years ago
... well, I do know a few of the scents... 🙈
Translated · Show originalShow translation
UntermWertUntermWert 4 years ago
Very interesting and informative description and analysis of the fragrance that makes me curious about the brand and the perfumer (I don't think I actually know anything from them? … I need to look that up right away). Thank you!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GaukeleyaGaukeleya 4 years ago
A typically yataganesque, sovereign fragrance homage, here: also a nod to the courage to follow one's own path. And as always with you: a beautifully dissected scent experience made readable. Wonderful!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
VrabecVrabec 4 years ago
Duchafour has created some of the most brilliant fragrances, but among the 234 listed here on Parfumo that he has produced, there are also quite a few uninspired, mediocre scents. This one seems very interesting; I especially love the combination of incense and green mango in Timbuktu. Duchafour often does a great job of reinterpreting classic elements to make them wearable for a young man like me. I’ll keep this fragrance in mind. Thanks!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Medusa00Medusa00 4 years ago
again very well broken down
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PlutoPluto 4 years ago
1
Straight to the ML, welcome back 😉
Translated · Show originalShow translation
CouchlockCouchlock 4 years ago
I really appreciate Bertrand, even though, like you, I don't love everything he does. But it's always exciting to test his fragrances. You've made this one sound appealing; it's going on my never-ending wishlist!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ShamisShamis 4 years ago
As exciting as your description of the scent sounds, I probably wouldn't like it. Of course, it always depends a bit on the wearer. Definitely an impressive analysis!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SeeroseSeerose 4 years ago
If I ever had to gift a perfume to a man and didn't know his taste, this would be an option.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Jas0NJas0N 4 years ago
1
Well outlined, informative, and refreshing at the same time. Thank you for that!
Happy holidays!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
JonasP1JonasP1 4 years ago
Very nice, informative comment! That sounds like a "new old" fragrance that I’m sure I would like as well :-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
BastianBastian 4 years ago
Great review. Informative and really interesting to read. Thanks for that. St. Gilles is truly remarkable. Tycoon was really brilliant.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ChizzaChizza 4 years ago
Well analyzed, great comment, and I last read *Homunculus* years ago. ;)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Medianus76Medianus76 4 years ago
I feel the same way; I often find myself captivated by Duchaufour's creations. Everything I've tested from him has revealed the quality and high standard of his work. It's no wonder I had to add The Tycoon to my collection, as this fragrance continues to amaze me time and again. Unfortunately, I haven't tried The Writer yet. However, your lovely description and Nui's comment make it clear that I need to test it...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TaurusTaurus 4 years ago
Thanks ... I'll note that down. I need to keep an eye on it too ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Can777Can777 4 years ago
1
So many classics you mentioned that I love wearing myself. And I don't know the scent? That needs to change..!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FvSpeeFvSpee 4 years ago
Excellent review, thank you. From this series, I know "Tycoon." What a scent, one that brings me to my knees, that I admire and worship - but somehow I just don't like wearing it.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GandixGandix 4 years ago
Great informative review... I prefer the Tycoon.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MonsieurTestMonsieurTest 4 years ago
3
Very fine mapping and comparisons of this often overlooked work by the clever, never boring creator Duchaufour.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SiebenkäsSiebenkäs 4 years ago
What a magnificent review! And how nice that you're writing again. Your very nuanced fragrance description would be enough, but the scent references you mentioned (all favorite fragrances) have made me incredibly curious. I like Duchaufour too, so I need to visit the nearest niche perfumery soon... Thanks for the great inspiration!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SeejungfrauSeejungfrau 4 years ago
Whether it's unisex will show. I think so :-) Rhubarb in the scent. Great. I still remember, you liked Timbuktu a lot too.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TofuwachtelTofuwachtel 4 years ago
Yesterday and today in a bottle. That sounds absolutely enticing!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PonticusPonticus 4 years ago
A wonderfully compelling piece written in a way that makes the actual scent description shine like a sparkling light! A review that I enjoyed reading very much and with great interest!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
M3000M3000 4 years ago
1
With all due respect for your always precise structural analysis, including reference points, this sounds overly retro to me. The classification of innovation doesn’t really change my perception as much as I would find fitting for The Writer. I wanted to get this off my chest because I often react sensitively to old school / retro / vintage. And I don’t perceive that aspect at all in the overall impression here.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParfumAholicParfumAholic 4 years ago
I think it's great when "the good from yesterday" is combined with the achievements of modern times. It seems like that has been quite successful here.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ErgoproxyErgoproxy 4 years ago
1
That sounds very interesting.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Jpg153Jpg153 4 years ago
For the first time in a long while, I found myself thinking "I should test this" - Thanks for the detailed description, as always!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ParmaParma 4 years ago
A really great, detailed review. I enjoyed reading it a lot. I liked The Tycoon too.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FloydFloyd 4 years ago
This reads like excellent and entertaining secondary literature. Great!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
KovexKovex 4 years ago
Duchaufour, my favorite perfumer, The Tycoon, one of my absolute favorite scents, so - especially after your great description - The Writer can only match my taste. Noted! Have a lovely 4th Advent!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PinkdawnPinkdawn 4 years ago
1
Certainly an intriguing and excitingly unconventional scent, not just for writers. It probably takes a correspondingly eccentric personality to wear this perfume.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Fresh21Fresh21 4 years ago
Your comment is just as interesting as the scent, but while its awesome vibe chased me away in the first 45 minutes, followed by its strangely foreign development, I happily followed your review until the very last point :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
AndrulaAndrula 4 years ago
" .. there's a light over at the Frankenstein place .. " .. I see that light in your great review too .. informative, interesting, and as always, light and fluid .. ( .. but the title did remind me of Rocky Horror :D )
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SalvaSalva 4 years ago
A very helpful and informative description of what seems to be an exciting fragrance. However, based on the notes, I think it might not be for me personally.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchatzSucherSchatzSucher 4 years ago
1
I agree with you, it's worth taking a sniff of Mr. Duchaufour's work. Even though I don't like everything he does either.
This line really does fly a bit under the radar. I recently enjoyed The Stylist as well, which is definitely not generic.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PollitaPollita 4 years ago
With Nui, I thought, okay, definitely too animalic for my nose, and now you mention Man Pure, which I find simply elegant and masculine. And I really, really like Duchaufour's work. It might actually appeal to me after all.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
NuiWhakakoreNuiWhakakore 4 years ago
Thanks for the scientifically grounded breakdown, unfortunately my nose can't do that! In the end, we see it the same way, which makes me happy, and it's a good one too...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SummermicSummermic 4 years ago
1
Informative and exciting! Thank you 🕉️
Translated · Show originalShow translation