Tiffany & Co. Tiffany & Co. 2017

As a fan of the movie "Breakfast at Tiffany's," I was quite curious about this fragrance, especially since perfumes play a role in it - noble scents. And of course, during my first visit to New York, I had to stop by this store - well aware that such jewelry does not suit me. However, on the ground floor, there was only what is intended for the "passing customers" of the noble house. Well, I’ve seen it once. The real investors seem to be served in other rooms. Anyway, what I saw did not impress me; a few streets away, I did see some really beautiful jewelry in a display, modern and elegant - of course, at astronomical prices.
Back to Tiffany's latest creation: It does have a floral aspect, but it feels flat and lacks refinement. Green mandarin? I couldn’t detect it, not even close; rather, from the very beginning, there’s an abstract floral quality that exudes little sensuality and remains strangely faceless. Iris? There are hundreds of fragrances that handle it much more sophisticatedly and "authentically." I can derive nothing more from this scent than desolation across the board. Even the patchouli in the base doesn’t save it; while it doesn’t smell like a cellar vault, it fails to round things off softly and instead becomes slightly annoying. The longevity, on the other hand, is enormous, which is entirely unnecessary.
High house! It is by no means creative to feed something produced a hundred times into a regurgitation process - this pasture has been grazed. In the end, a film comes to mind: Theo Lingen says to his seemingly moderately talented students: "Sad, sad, sad!" - Fits perfectly here as well.