2
Is the hype and criticism justified?
First of all, one must say that the hype alone makes the fragrance worse than it is, however, one can understand the criticism as this scent is no longer unique.
The opening begins with a bomb of fruits and an irresistible sweetness that is fruity.
In the drydown, one quickly notices that the fragrance has something synthetic about it. These fruity notes stand out continuously in the first hours.
Once you reach the base note, it becomes interesting again, as the fruity sweetness is no longer present. Instead, a very amber and musk-heavy note emerges. One could almost say sugar in a bottle.
The longevity of the fragrance is good and the projection is enormous, which is why many associate the scent with headaches. There can be no argument about the bottle; all from the Velvet collection by Xerjoff are beautiful.
Overall, the fragrance is very appealing to the younger to adult generation, which is why it is no longer something special. There are also many alternatives that resemble the scent, e.g. Momona by Parfums D’Elmar.
The opening begins with a bomb of fruits and an irresistible sweetness that is fruity.
In the drydown, one quickly notices that the fragrance has something synthetic about it. These fruity notes stand out continuously in the first hours.
Once you reach the base note, it becomes interesting again, as the fruity sweetness is no longer present. Instead, a very amber and musk-heavy note emerges. One could almost say sugar in a bottle.
The longevity of the fragrance is good and the projection is enormous, which is why many associate the scent with headaches. There can be no argument about the bottle; all from the Velvet collection by Xerjoff are beautiful.
Overall, the fragrance is very appealing to the younger to adult generation, which is why it is no longer something special. There are also many alternatives that resemble the scent, e.g. Momona by Parfums D’Elmar.
Translated · Show original