Ambre Noir by Yves Rocher

Ambre Noir 2013

Aliana
04/07/2016 - 05:09 AM
23
Top Review
7Scent 4Longevity 4Sillage 7Bottle

His charm cannot disguise his impotence

I received it as a Christmas gift in 2014 and didn't unpack it for almost 4 months - because I wanted to spare myself the possible disappointment. Then, as it got warmer, I decided to give it a chance.

A full spray on my inner elbow.
At first, the scent seems confused. As if the fragrance particles don't know what to do.... Released for the first time, they act really dumb, probably need to blink, look around stupidly, and get used to the daylight. This bewildered clamor lasts about 10 minutes, then they finally manage to create a scent. One that makes me hopeful.
It could become something.

It has a pull, like a dark, bitter praline, with an orange cream filling. Even though the praline itself is dark, it is just a recurring, subtle thread of scent. Nothing else is dark. On the contrary. The fragrance has the same color as its liquid in the bottle.
Time passes, I enjoy this quiet promise, sniffing at my skin again and again... We - I and the fragrance - seem to be stuck in a state of expectation. I expect it to become something. No idea what. Maybe that the particles will do something - if they can't put on a striptease, then at least loosen their hips. But maybe the fragrance is waiting for me to like it for what it already is, so it can shed its shyness? Well, okay. I approach it, my nose nudges it kindly, benevolently. That seems to give it courage and it shows me a dry, floral note. An exceedingly beautiful one. The only stupid thing is, it only shows it to me when I'm ready to cuddle. Otherwise, it practically disappears after 3 hours! What’s that supposed to mean?!
The performance ends before I even realize it has begun? It certainly seems that way!
I stand there and wonder what I should do with this perfume. Like it? Look at it offended? Give it away? Is "nice" good enough? Does all of this now justify a disappointment?

My problem with this scent is that its fragrance components are beautiful, but homeopathically dosed. If I don't bury my nose in my inner elbow, I smell it weakly, and only at the beginning.
It's annoying, yes, it's disappointing. I think it's not enough to just be nice. Why should I flirt with it and put up with its impotence? I don't need that.
It's always the same with Yves Rocher fragrances, I've written it elsewhere too: Many nice, good approaches, and poor presence and longevity! Guys, do something in the bottle, for heaven's sake! Is it about money? There are companies where you pay the same and get perfumes that last. I don't care what it costs. Make it 10 times more expensive, but good! Then I would buy it for myself. Oh, and don't lie about the name, if it's not too much to ask. The fragrances are too good to throw away, but too weak to wear. Yes, I could reapply. I do that sometimes at home. But outside, I just forget it. I don't go out to flirt, I go to do whatever, but not to think about whether my perfume still lasts.
All the Yves Rocher perfumes I own have been given to me as gifts. But somehow I can't help but look into the mouth of the beast. Maybe I'm just too ungrateful....
So, that would be it.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
12 Comments
Camey5000Camey5000 6 years ago
Refreshing to read. It's been a while, but it's still good. :-))
Translated · Show originalShow translation
LilienfeldLilienfeld 10 years ago
*laugh...yes, the title says it all :)
we know the problem ;D you could also say *bloodless :))
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Escada1970Escada1970 10 years ago
Written casually...very nice :-) I don't like the new YR fragrances, they were great before, but now they're just what you described above.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
BlauemausBlauemaus 10 years ago
It's okay. :-) Everyone has to decide for themselves how much they want to spend on a fragrance. Personally, I refuse to invest a lot in a scent because I just don't see the point for myself. I have other hobbies that cost money.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SeeroseSeerose 10 years ago
So far, I've only experienced one fragrance from YR, Rose Isphahan, which I found convincing and beautiful. Otherwise, I always smelled something different in the bottle than promised, and it was lackluster.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
AlianaAliana 10 years ago
@Blauemaus, I didn't mean to come off as arrogant. My financial resources aren't endless either. I just wanted to express that I'm willing to pay for good quality. I'm sorry if it came across differently :/
Translated · Show originalShow translation
BlauemausBlauemaus 10 years ago
Well, I can't complain - they generally last well on me. It's possible that you would be willing to pay ten times as much. Not everyone has the financial means for that though... ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
KlarseherinKlarseherin 10 years ago
Well described. We should try reducing it in the cauldron like we do with gravy :)) Maybe the concentrate is good :)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Yuki68Yuki68 10 years ago
"About 10 minutes of the bewildered clucking"... Wonderful! :) Yes, I feel the same way about the YR fragrances. They're not bad, but the longevity is terrible. I wish they would come out with something decent!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
MEZEMEZE 10 years ago
I've told you before, Aliana - you really write amazing metaphors! I don't know this perfume, but I had to laugh. And it's true about the money - better to spend 100 euros and get something worthwhile than to spend 20 for nothing...
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TerraTerra 10 years ago
Yes, I know a few scents like that too. Well described!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GschpusiGschpusi 10 years ago
Nicely described *smiles*
Translated · Show originalShow translation