Fovere by Phil Julian

Fovere 2025

Taurus
04/23/2025 - 01:38 AM
18
Top Review
8.5Scent 8Longevity 7Sillage 8Bottle

Fovere - Sweetness Forever

The wordplay may not be very original, but it somehow seems fitting. Because if you can immediately associate Fovere with something, it is sweetness. And it is a rather carefree sweetness that seems to be composed of many components, such as bergamot, lavender, as well as tobacco flower and, above all, amber-like notes.

But there is also a hint of sharp ginger, very soft rum, and not-so-earthy patchouli to be found. I even suspected a pinch of cardamom - but it is not listed.
At this point, one naturally tries to draw connections with the familiar, with the mentioned "Naxos | XerJoff" and "Grand Soir | Maison Francis Kurkdjian" coming to mind, the former being without honey and the latter without resin - and overall a good idea lighter.

This impression takes quite some time to develop, before later becoming softer again with musk, tonka bean, and vanilla, and above all a bit more gourmand. Sandalwood adds a small spark of welcome mystique.

Alongside all the mentioned facets, I also catch a whiff of soapiness... and I keep thinking about cardamom. After all, the spiciness that is indicated alongside the sweetness must come from somewhere.

In conclusion, it can be said that Fovere is a successful debut for the brand Phil Julian and absolutely has its place. Those who disdain sweet fragrances will certainly not be converted by this, but it offers an appealing and trendy vibe that works both in summer and winter. In my eyes, a refined sweet scent that, although it neither really lasts "Forever" nor necessarily offers monster projection, still has a lot to offer in that regard and will definitely make its way.

Congratulations on that... and I am curious to see what else the brand hatches. Keep it up!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
20 Comments
timothybtimothyb 9 months ago
1
I wore the scent yesterday to a concert and then to a bar - I've rarely received so much positive feedback and interest about a fragrance! If that’s not a good sign for the debut…
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TaurusTaurus 8 months ago
Yes, that definitely speaks for itself. What more could you want? :-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PonticusPonticus 9 months ago
1
I'm easily convinced by scents like these, and when I get such a great recommendation from you, I'm already sold!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TaurusTaurus 9 months ago
1
Luckily, you're not completely alone in that! :-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
DuftJunkieDuftJunkie 9 months ago
2
A complex sweetness? Without honey? Sounds interesting. Makes me curious!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TaurusTaurus 9 months ago
1
Well, then it might be something for you :-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SchatzSucherSchatzSucher 9 months ago
2
I consider myself someone who usually avoids sweet scents, although there are always those certain exceptions. However, I often find the lavender-tonka combination disappointing. But I appreciate your description, and I'm sure the fragrance will find its enthusiastic fans.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TaurusTaurus 9 months ago
2
Yes - I hope so too, that a new brand with an ambitious founder gets a real chance here. From what I'm seeing, some perfume enthusiasts are going a bit overboard in a negative way and being unfair.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
GoldGold 9 months ago
2
I can imagine it being pleasant since I really love cardamom. However, it shouldn't be too sweet for me, but then again, sweetness perception is very individual, just like any other experience.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TaurusTaurus 9 months ago
2
Everyone perceives sweetness in their own way. It is sweet, but you won't get a sugar shock from it ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
KovexKovex 9 months ago
3
I'm also someone who tends to avoid "sweet scents," not because I don't like them, but because I find it hard to wear those kinds of fragrances. However, this one seems to have something special, given all the positive feedback. It has convinced you too. I'm curious to see how it turns out!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TaurusTaurus 9 months ago
1
Yes, it really is nice - even though I'm usually cautious with sweet scents, since most people around me struggle with them. But you wear fragrances for yourself anyway :-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
PollitaPollita 9 months ago
1
It sounds really nice on you. Since Grand Soir wasn't really my thing, I'll skip the test here. I do like sweet scents, but for me, it has to be a bit more floral and classic. This one seems quite masculine and spicy-sweet to me.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TaurusTaurus 9 months ago
The Fovere doesn't come across as too masculine at all. Actually, anyone can wear it ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
ElAttarineElAttarine 9 months ago
1
How nice that you like it! Unfortunately, it didn't work out as well for me.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TaurusTaurus 9 months ago
Yes, I didn't find the sweetness too extreme or overwhelming ;-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
FloydFloyd 9 months ago
2
Sounds quite pleasant.. and thanks for introducing the brand!
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TaurusTaurus 9 months ago
Thank you, and you're welcome! :-) ... let's see how it continues to be received! :-)
Translated · Show originalShow translation
SerenissimaSerenissima 9 months ago
1
You captured exactly what I imagined after the pyramid:
An uncomplicated scent that will surely find its fans, as it seems to have been composed quite carefully.
It will be interesting to see how a "strange bird" can settle into a community.
The courage to take this step deserves recognition.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TaurusTaurus 9 months ago
Definitely, and I'm really curious to see how it continues to be received here and how the brand establishes itself.
Translated · Show originalShow translation