
ChicoRoch1
163 Reviews

ChicoRoch1
Helpful Review
3
Again go Vintage
I'm sounding like a broken record but as long as companies change hands and then decide to RUIN a classic fragrance then I'll keep on exposing them. I grew up in the 1970s so i know how nice and strong and manly English Leather USED to be. I recently purchased a vintage bottle from the MEM company and also I purchase a current bottle released by Dana. English leather was born in 1949 and is a leather scent for men. I stood side-by-side and sprayed the Vintage version on my left wrist and the current version on my right wrist and the difference is shocking. It doesn't even smell like the same fragrance and I don't know about you but it bothers me when companies take classic fragrances and just decide to destroy them and then have the audacity to pass them off as the same. Call me old-fashioned, traditional call me whatever I don't care but I know what I like and 90% of the fragrances that I own are vintage versions and they are that way for a reason. Vintage is just better it was made better it lasted longer the smell was better it lasted longer the quality of the ingredients was better. The Vintage version is much more masculine the leather is stronger it's much more complex while the current version is much sweeter and thinner I guess to appease the younger generation yuck. I don't care as long as I have a dollar in my pocket I will keep searching for vintage while everyone else can go pound sand
1 Comment