13
Helpful Review
Translated
Show original
Aventus for..her?
Super interesting fragrance, where I understand on the one hand, but on the other hand do not understand at all how the ratings come about - if that makes sense.
The fragrance opens very fresh, one perceives, as in the male counterpart (at least in previous batches), fruity, but also somewhat tart notes, although second-named here is not so dominant. Woods also definitely prominent. A somewhat sober description, which I would like to give this fragrance, however, is "rough". I have read here in the statements already "scratchy", which I can also understand, yet I find the word rough more appropriate.
Is that now good or bad?
Well, hard to say. However, I find that this fragrance is anything but strictly feminine. Really, it isn't. Precisely because of this connection, I understand very well that this results in, probably predominantly from ladies given, rather average ratings. Does not mean that I can not imagine him on a woman, by no means, but unisex is this fragrance times at least - and I find him great.
In fact, I would personally classify this fragrance even more masculine. Have him the other day at a gentleman smelled and not only I, but also other people, were strikingly enthusiastic. And here we come to the part that I do not understand in the reviews. Durability and especially sillage. Durability seems super to me, but I've rarely experienced a fragrance that projects like Aventus for her. Room filling is the only thing I can think of here. Whether that in turn is now good or bad, everyone can decide for themselves - but what can be said is that a person who does not like this fragrance will have a hard time next to the wearer or the wearer!:)
Conclusion: I can understand that people do not like this fragrance, but I find it very successful. Durability and especially sillage I can only give absolute top ratings.
A try this fragrance is worth for everyone, whether woman or man.
The fragrance opens very fresh, one perceives, as in the male counterpart (at least in previous batches), fruity, but also somewhat tart notes, although second-named here is not so dominant. Woods also definitely prominent. A somewhat sober description, which I would like to give this fragrance, however, is "rough". I have read here in the statements already "scratchy", which I can also understand, yet I find the word rough more appropriate.
Is that now good or bad?
Well, hard to say. However, I find that this fragrance is anything but strictly feminine. Really, it isn't. Precisely because of this connection, I understand very well that this results in, probably predominantly from ladies given, rather average ratings. Does not mean that I can not imagine him on a woman, by no means, but unisex is this fragrance times at least - and I find him great.
In fact, I would personally classify this fragrance even more masculine. Have him the other day at a gentleman smelled and not only I, but also other people, were strikingly enthusiastic. And here we come to the part that I do not understand in the reviews. Durability and especially sillage. Durability seems super to me, but I've rarely experienced a fragrance that projects like Aventus for her. Room filling is the only thing I can think of here. Whether that in turn is now good or bad, everyone can decide for themselves - but what can be said is that a person who does not like this fragrance will have a hard time next to the wearer or the wearer!:)
Conclusion: I can understand that people do not like this fragrance, but I find it very successful. Durability and especially sillage I can only give absolute top ratings.
A try this fragrance is worth for everyone, whether woman or man.
5 Comments
Tabre
