We may earn a commission when you buy from links on our site, including the eBay Partner Network and Amazon.

Amelia 2012

7.4 / 10 45 Ratings
A perfume by Grossmith for women, released in 2012. The scent is floral-sweet. It is still in production.
Compare
Similar fragrances
We may earn a commission when you buy from links on our site, including the eBay Partner Network and Amazon.

Main accords

Floral
Sweet
Powdery
Animal
Woody

Fragrance Pyramid

Top Notes Top Notes
OsmanthusOsmanthus NeroliNeroli
Heart Notes Heart Notes
JasmineJasmine PeonyPeony RoseRose AmberAmber
Base Notes Base Notes
Kashmiri muskKashmiri musk PatchouliPatchouli SandalwoodSandalwood VetiverVetiver

Perfumer

Ratings
Scent
7.445 Ratings
Longevity
7.234 Ratings
Sillage
6.635 Ratings
Bottle
7.739 Ratings
Submitted by Kankuro, last update on 08/07/2025.

Smells similar

What the fragrance is similar to
For Her (Eau de Toilette) by Narciso Rodriguez
For Her Eau de Toilette
Lovely (Eau de Parfum) by Sarah Jessica Parker
Lovely Eau de Parfum
Lalibela (Eau de Parfum) by Memo Paris
Lalibela Eau de Parfum

Reviews

3 in-depth fragrance descriptions
Seerose

775 Reviews
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Seerose
Seerose
Very helpful Review 0  
Never After Midnight!
I had to have "her," absolutely! As a decant, of course! "Amelia by Grossmith." And since I only had time and peace after midnight, I thought this floral scent would be just right for a first test before going to bed and could serve as a nightcap afterward. Although I read about my candidate for disgust: Jasmine. Scents with it I can only try in the morning at least for testing. However, there are less animalistic and finer to very lovely jasmine variants. That’s what I actually assumed with this sinfully expensive fragrance for me.
But now "Amelia": She launched right away with fat, carrion-like jasmine that escalated into something fecal within seconds. I was horrified and immensely disappointed. Fortunately, the sillage was not very strong.
Since I still owed someone an email, I took care of that. And behold: The scent became softer, the stench completely receded, "Amelia" became gentler, the peony raised its beautifully rosy and slightly tea-scented bloom. In addition, I smelled a delicate green-white rose.
Furthermore, it remained a delicate, fine green and rather quiet scent. With that, I could go to bed. This lightly restrained fragrance blend stayed that way and was also perceivable in nearly the same quiet intensity in the morning.
The next morning, in cool weather, I did the second test.
It was as I suspected. The jasmine was very bearable, and within a short time, the scent was as delicately floral as it had been at night. But now it seemed to me that it resembled Samsara.
I tried this on the other wrist. The similarity is there for me. However, Samsara is more opulent, more expressive. For me, Samsara is also only to be used as a morning scent.
I kept comparing "Amelia" with the presented fragrance components and sniffing.
I suspect that the musk scent pushes jasmine at the beginning. However, I miss osmanthus. Perhaps it just enriches the jasmine with even more animalistic notes. Neroli? Nothing hesperidic, nowhere, and not as a start for me. Although neroli has nothing cologne-citrusy about it, at least not for me.
And where are sandalwood and vetiver? The scent remains floral and delicate. Consistently, as it unfolded after the jasmine attack, it holds for many hours until the end. Perhaps the woods have gone into coalition for the peonies and the rose?
After about 2 hours, Samsara diverges from Amelia, Samsara then releases the unlisted tuberose and becomes vanillic, powdery.
Amelia, on the other hand, remains a beautiful, gentle scent that does not at least partially transform into something powdery or creamy.
That the scent only presents flowers is perfectly fine for me, who likes floral scents.
Maybe I am just not "ripe" enough for such exclusive fragrances?
Unfortunately, I cannot manage to push the price out of my evaluation.
I still don't really understand "Amelia."
4 Comments
Venice

56 Reviews
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Venice
Venice
Top Review 1  
Restoration of Honor
For the first time, I heard about this fragrance in the ALZD fragrance diary, where Ulrike raves about it and almost claps her hands in excitement. Such a hymn of praise naturally raises high expectations, which were tempered again by the comment from my predecessor. But precisely because of these opposing opinions, it was clear that this fragrance had to be tested. Thanks to dear hannali, I now have a sample, many thanks for that.

And I must disagree with my predecessor: The fragrance is not old-fashioned at all to my nose; rather, the opposite is true, as it bears a striking resemblance to NR For Her and its twins. This realization initially sobered me: Aha, a pricey NR For Her dupe then. But that does not do justice to the fragrance, as I have discovered in the last few days. For Her (I am talking about the EdT) is loud and edgy. This one, on the other hand, is quiet and elegant, transparent yet endowed with depth and a certain sexy dirtiness, without being a "stinker." Because I do not smell any indolic or animalistic notes here, at least not more than in For Her, among others. From a distance, it reminds me of ELdO's Divin'Enfant without the off-putting cold smoke note that makes the ELdO fragrance so unbearably filthy for me. Divin'Enfant Light, so to speak, or NR For Her plus.

The flowers here are not lady-like heavy, cloying, or musty, but rather diffuse, very subtle, and underlined with a round, smooth warmth that evokes impressions of laundry fresh from the dryer, warmed and with the faint scent of fabric softener. The aforementioned sexiness (which I admit does not quite fit this impression) is more in the background; to be a heartbreaker, Amelia is just too transparent and cultivated.

The scent aura is, in accordance with the light character of the fragrance, rather close to the skin, and the longevity is surprisingly good. It accompanies you for several hours, about an average workday.

Conclusion: A good, a very good all-rounder that may not fully justify the enthusiasm in the fragrance diary, but also does not deserve the harsh criticism as a grandma scent, in my opinion at least. I particularly like this delicate, diffuse fabric softener floral quality without soap, which I have not found in any other fragrance.
3 Comments
5Scent
Bertel

236 Reviews
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Bertel
Bertel
Very helpful Review 8  
A Mature Girl
"Amelia," part of the "Black Label Collection" by Grossmith, named after Amelia Brook, the daughter of founder John Grossmith and thus the great-grandmother of the current owner Simon Brooke - according to Grossmith "a soft and elegant modern chypre."

So much in advance: Soft certainly, elegant perhaps, but not really modern, quite the opposite. The opening with neroli and osmanthus presents "Amelia" as a very weak, thin little water, dominated by a very restrained, rather indefinable slightly bitter-herbaceous tone (neroli is not really that) over which I perceive a hint of honeydew melon.

After a few minutes, the floral notes join this delicate-sweet overtone, and from this point on, a very strong, very present, slightly soapy tone of peonies dominates, supported by jasmine and a bit of rose essentially until the end of this fragrance. A whole range of soft, warming ingredients like amber as well as patchouli, sandalwood, vetiver, and "cashmere musks" are mentioned to round off the overall composition very subtly and, at least for me, not individually distinguishable a little towards the bottom, but they never let any doubt arise that this is essentially a rather heavy, very traditional, unmistakably feminine peony-jasmine scent.

A tribute to one's own great-grandmother is certainly achieved with this very traditional, "old-fashioned" fragrance, but to label it as "modern chypre" I believe is massively misleading. For lovers of traditional floral compositions and peony enthusiasts, it is certainly worth considering.
3 Comments

Statements

5 short views on the fragrance
3
Early 2000's vibes, pastel color bouquet. Musky base feels fuzzy and top quality, but still edges to laundry detergent at times
0 Comments
2
Ethereal, underplayed musky floral.
0 Comments
1
Luxury version of Narciso EDT and SJP Lovely. Outrageous price but what can I do? Narciso turns nasty on me and Lovely is too weak.
0 Comments
42
36
Narciso!
Amelia sighed
And pressed her rosy cheek
And the soft osmanthus musk curves
Against the opaque edges
Of its black casing
Translated · Show originalShow translation
36 Comments
4
1. totally strong animalistic jasmine
2. enchanting delicate tea peonies, soft-green white rose
3. soft-powdery, creamy. I didn't notice the listed base except for the Kashmir cream.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
0 Comments

Charts

This is how the community classifies the fragrance.
Pie Chart Radar Chart

Images

5 fragrance photos of the community
More images

Popular by Grossmith

Hasu-no-Hana (Eau de Parfum) by Grossmith Shem-el-Nessim (Eau de Parfum) by Grossmith Phũl-Nãnã (Eau de Parfum) by Grossmith Betrothal (2011) (Eau de Parfum) by Grossmith Golden Chypre by Grossmith Floral Veil by Grossmith Diamond Jubilee Bouquet by Grossmith Saffron Rose by Grossmith Sylvan Song by Grossmith Phũl-Nãnã (Parfum) by Grossmith Hasu-no-Hana (Perfume) by Grossmith Shem-el-Nessim (Perfume) by Grossmith King's Salute by Grossmith Betrothal (2011) (Perfume) by Grossmith Paris Rose by Grossmith Old Cottage Lavender by Grossmith White Lilac by Grossmith Lily of the Valley by Grossmith Lavender Water by Grossmith English Freesia by Grossmith