
Terra
646 Reviews
Translated · Show original

Terra
Top Review
Unusual Beauty
Basically, there isn't much more to say here, as my predecessor has already illuminated the fragrance very well in his comment.
When I tested No. 3 this morning, I really didn't know whether I liked it or not. I found it great, interesting, and different. But I couldn't quite categorize it. That seems to be really difficult, as it is an unusual scent that doesn't smell odd, disharmonious, or difficult to wear.
It's all about incense, but it's not a clichéd and already smelled a hundred times incense scent.
In the opening, I smell an ethereal-bright, sparkling-resinous, camphor-like-fruity incense. The bitter orange skillfully highlights the fruity accents of the incense, and I don't know if it's the "Bushman candle," but some fragrance component seems to emphasize the slightly camphoraceous aspects of the incense a bit more. Still, No. 3 doesn't smell really fresh, but rather resinous.
I don't know if the following association comes from the name or from the fact that my sample dispenser pointed me in this direction: something waxy seems to accompany this incense. You can almost feel this texture; you seem to smell it.
I find No. 3 very ecclesiastical, but not in the sense of a mass. No. 3 doesn't smell like a church where incense is currently being burned. I don't even know how that smells, as I am neither baptized nor a regular churchgoer. I only know how incense smells when burned at home. However, I do enjoy visiting empty churches because I find them beautiful. And there is a typical smell of (extinguished) candles, old books, cold stone, and incense that was burned during the last mass.
This combination of wax and incense feels ecclesiastical to me, but not sacred. Do you understand what I mean? It smells like a church without any connection to religion.
I don't perceive jasmine as very dominant. I am also a bit jasmine-hardened, drink a lot of jasmine tea, and like jasmine; perhaps that's why. However, this waxiness also seems to have something floral about it, which is not indolic but rather delicate-floral. The cedar seems coherent to me, so No. 3 does have a somewhat dry-woody edge.
Above all, the bitter orange runs very extensively through the fragrance for my nose and seems to be very decisive for its development. It prevents the cedar from becoming too dusty, supports the fruitiness of the incense, and perhaps makes the jasmine appear a bit more delicately floral. It always provides contrast and complements.
What I absolutely must say: Who the hell came up with this name? If one should really be approached about this fragrance, what does one respond? I could probably never remember the whole name.
No. 3 is really not scratchy, and yes, it is cooling and warming at the same time. Probably just as needed. Many fragrances try to be independent and unusual, but often they end up smelling like cheap backyard concoctions or are hardly wearable. But here, everything feels super natural and high-quality, unusual yet rounded and harmonious. Only a few fragrances achieve that!
Whether I want No. 3, I still don't really know. It just leaves me a bit perplexed. The fragrance costs €170 according to the website, but it seems that 140ml is also included in the bottle. That seems fair to me. Perhaps a candidate for a small decant for more precise testing, as I have rarely been so indecisive. Not about whether I like a fragrance. I think it's great. But about whether I want to wear and have it myself.
When I tested No. 3 this morning, I really didn't know whether I liked it or not. I found it great, interesting, and different. But I couldn't quite categorize it. That seems to be really difficult, as it is an unusual scent that doesn't smell odd, disharmonious, or difficult to wear.
It's all about incense, but it's not a clichéd and already smelled a hundred times incense scent.
In the opening, I smell an ethereal-bright, sparkling-resinous, camphor-like-fruity incense. The bitter orange skillfully highlights the fruity accents of the incense, and I don't know if it's the "Bushman candle," but some fragrance component seems to emphasize the slightly camphoraceous aspects of the incense a bit more. Still, No. 3 doesn't smell really fresh, but rather resinous.
I don't know if the following association comes from the name or from the fact that my sample dispenser pointed me in this direction: something waxy seems to accompany this incense. You can almost feel this texture; you seem to smell it.
I find No. 3 very ecclesiastical, but not in the sense of a mass. No. 3 doesn't smell like a church where incense is currently being burned. I don't even know how that smells, as I am neither baptized nor a regular churchgoer. I only know how incense smells when burned at home. However, I do enjoy visiting empty churches because I find them beautiful. And there is a typical smell of (extinguished) candles, old books, cold stone, and incense that was burned during the last mass.
This combination of wax and incense feels ecclesiastical to me, but not sacred. Do you understand what I mean? It smells like a church without any connection to religion.
I don't perceive jasmine as very dominant. I am also a bit jasmine-hardened, drink a lot of jasmine tea, and like jasmine; perhaps that's why. However, this waxiness also seems to have something floral about it, which is not indolic but rather delicate-floral. The cedar seems coherent to me, so No. 3 does have a somewhat dry-woody edge.
Above all, the bitter orange runs very extensively through the fragrance for my nose and seems to be very decisive for its development. It prevents the cedar from becoming too dusty, supports the fruitiness of the incense, and perhaps makes the jasmine appear a bit more delicately floral. It always provides contrast and complements.
What I absolutely must say: Who the hell came up with this name? If one should really be approached about this fragrance, what does one respond? I could probably never remember the whole name.
No. 3 is really not scratchy, and yes, it is cooling and warming at the same time. Probably just as needed. Many fragrances try to be independent and unusual, but often they end up smelling like cheap backyard concoctions or are hardly wearable. But here, everything feels super natural and high-quality, unusual yet rounded and harmonious. Only a few fragrances achieve that!
Whether I want No. 3, I still don't really know. It just leaves me a bit perplexed. The fragrance costs €170 according to the website, but it seems that 140ml is also included in the bottle. That seems fair to me. Perhaps a candidate for a small decant for more precise testing, as I have rarely been so indecisive. Not about whether I like a fragrance. I think it's great. But about whether I want to wear and have it myself.
6 Comments



Frankincense
Jasmine
Bitter orange
Virginia cedar
Bushman's candle
Labdanum
White musk
Amyris
Bergamot
Cashmeran
Gaiac wood
Patchouli


Floyd
Pollita
Terra
Chizza
ParfumAholic






















