BlueBird

My statement about this fragrance is a good three years old and I now own a bottle. The fragrance impression of "then" seems to me today not very differentiated and does not really reflect the essence of the fragrance. That's why I would like to go into the fragrance a bit more closely and maybe encourage one or the other to take a test.

The fragrance has a sweet start, but at the same time it also has a sour note. First and foremost, I take Amber was and some of the rosewood. It doesn't take long and a powdery note develops, mixed with some oranges and berries, but these are discreetly restrained and never take over. I smell the bergamot only minimally in the overall impression "acidic". The florets mentioned float as a whole above the fragrance, but individual floral notes are difficult to name. They take some of the sour impression away from the fragrance and give it a little lightness. I guess the rose is the only one I can make out. A little soapy it also appears occasionally, although I perceive the scent as dry and powdery. In addition, I smell something woody and slightly earthy in the course of time. This may be due to Patchouli.

The Sillage decreases quite fast, remains however present and well perceptible for others. The fragrance composition is unusual and exciting and only after wearing it several times can I perceive the different nuances and also appreciate the facets of the fragrance. That's why the scent is not wearable for me every day. He always demands my attention, and that makes him almost exhausting. But if I want something "different", he's just in time.

I would be very interested in further scent impressions.

I ordered The only One 2 untested because I liked the first one so much. Now I am sitting here after several days and some test sprayers and phases and am really indecisive. How can the fragrance be described? The only One in fruity.

At the beginning I smell sweet pears and sour tingling blackberries. Sometimes the pears dominate, sometimes the blackberries. However, the berries win in the further course, so that the fragrance does not become too sweet. It's cute, but pleasantly cute. The fruity start is accompanied by delicate flowers. The roses and violets go wonderfully with the sour blackberry and remain discreetly in the background.
In the further process woods and the well-known coffee note come in addition. The rose gets louder, the blackberry quieter.

All in all, the scent is quite nice. I like the fruity start. However, the intermediate part, the heart note, is more according to my taste at the first. The powdery violets make it so special and different from Black Opium, which has often been called a twin. Here the rose and the fruity are more in the centre.

Well, and then the base... my nose denies me. I just can't feel the scent anymore. I don't know why that is. Maybe a scent blindness. I have a hunch about tonka bean, rose, woods.

The bottle is quite nice, matches the fruity part of the fragrance. Also the change of sweet and sour scents at the beginning is really interesting. As I said, I don't like the heart note so much compared to the first one and I hardly notice the base.

I'm staying with The Only One

I'm in love. I didn't expect that in my life. The bottle is so kitschy that the scent almost passed me by. Also the name does not appeal to me and awakens strange associations. LololitaLand, everything colorful and fairytale, peace joy pancakes... well, and so on. So rather for a young, quierlige target group, which likes sweet smells. And there, too, the fragrance will find its followers. But not only that! Because the scent is not just sweet.

The fragrance is elegant. Does without synthetics and is coherent in itself. Everything is so wonderfully coordinated and yes, also sweet, but also more.

First to base:
i've been wearing the scent for a few hours now and just got back from a nice winter walk. At home in the warmth, a creamy peach vanilla blows around me. Sometimes it smells like powdery, dry vanilla sugar, sometimes like floral pieces of peach. The floral tones somewhat dampen the fruity character of the peach. And it never smells cheap or trivial.

The fragrance has not undergone much development. Immediately after spraying it smells much more fruity, reminiscent of freshly filled fruity sparkling wine. Sparkling and invigorating. I've never had a Bellini before, but maybe it smells like one. Then I'd like it. I still don't think it's an "eating scent." I wouldn't say the scent's gourmand either. It always remains difficult to find correct pictures.

Now I am thinking about what the bottle should look like in order to match its contents. In any case, the packaging shouldn't be so green. The green and the animals are misleading. I would have taken more flowers in yellow, orange and blue-violet shades. I would also have replaced the deer with another animal. Not so shy and also more elegant and proud. Not pushy at all. A gazelle maybe?