D3win
Reviews
D3win
Translated
Show original
The real office for men?!
Yes, a provocative comment, I know. But for me, this description actually pretty much sums up where this fragrance comes into play for me.
The start goes right away relatively spicy and even slightly "boozy" the first time you smell it. However, this alcoholic note dissipates very quickly and from the rum remains actually only the woody-spicy.
I must admit that I can smell out the other notes only very difficult really and assign the respective component. The fragrance is simply very harmoniously matched in my nose, so that no note really dominates.
Only in the later course I actually perceive a certain but really very subtle sweetness. The fragrance remains throughout fresh-spicy-woody and definitely masculine.
My provocative headline came to mind because I also own the Office for Men, but so good they never wear in everyday professional life. The two fragrances have also olfactory nothing to do with each other. The Jil Sander strictly has currently become my signature scent for work. It lasts all day without the sillage being annoyingly strong, which for me is the perfect combination for the office. With the OFM, on the other hand, the sillage is too potent for me, as that he is really office-suitable.
I could get hold of the Jil Sander still for narrow money! Unfortunately, this great fragrance, like so many of the house of Sander, was discontinued. Really really too bad!
Who should also come across a fair offer, I recommend in any case to strike, before the prices take degenerating forms as with the background of the same house :D
The start goes right away relatively spicy and even slightly "boozy" the first time you smell it. However, this alcoholic note dissipates very quickly and from the rum remains actually only the woody-spicy.
I must admit that I can smell out the other notes only very difficult really and assign the respective component. The fragrance is simply very harmoniously matched in my nose, so that no note really dominates.
Only in the later course I actually perceive a certain but really very subtle sweetness. The fragrance remains throughout fresh-spicy-woody and definitely masculine.
My provocative headline came to mind because I also own the Office for Men, but so good they never wear in everyday professional life. The two fragrances have also olfactory nothing to do with each other. The Jil Sander strictly has currently become my signature scent for work. It lasts all day without the sillage being annoyingly strong, which for me is the perfect combination for the office. With the OFM, on the other hand, the sillage is too potent for me, as that he is really office-suitable.
I could get hold of the Jil Sander still for narrow money! Unfortunately, this great fragrance, like so many of the house of Sander, was discontinued. Really really too bad!
Who should also come across a fair offer, I recommend in any case to strike, before the prices take degenerating forms as with the background of the same house :D
1 Comment
Translated
Show original
Judge me!
Yeah, Boss Bottled's always like that. I can't think of any other brand that can exploit a line like Hugo Boss. Many are interchangeable and some are just not good... But this is not the case for me and not for everyone! Shortly there will be a comment on another brother (Tonic).
To the fragrance:
Like all Bottled, it starts with the unmistakable apple top note. This is joined by a slightly tart and herbaceous note, which I attribute to the sage. I don't notice any cinnamon during the entire fragrance process.
As soon as the fragrance settles a bit, a certain shower gel freshness is added, which gives the fragrance a certain "blue" touch.
Shortly afterwards, the rosemary adds a eucalypt character that I really like.
If one waits a while longer, the infinite takes on more and more woody traits. Here, a note that I would definitely describe as woody but can't really get a grip on. Since I don't know olive wood as a separate fragrance, I simply attribute this wood chord to olive wood :-D
A fragrance I'd like to take up a lance for! It is relatively simple and does a lot of things right for me in this spectrum. From spring to autumn I could wear it every day and I would feel comfortable. In my opinion, the durability is above average for a fresh bottle.
Give him a chance! He's not as bad as his reputation :)
To the fragrance:
Like all Bottled, it starts with the unmistakable apple top note. This is joined by a slightly tart and herbaceous note, which I attribute to the sage. I don't notice any cinnamon during the entire fragrance process.
As soon as the fragrance settles a bit, a certain shower gel freshness is added, which gives the fragrance a certain "blue" touch.
Shortly afterwards, the rosemary adds a eucalypt character that I really like.
If one waits a while longer, the infinite takes on more and more woody traits. Here, a note that I would definitely describe as woody but can't really get a grip on. Since I don't know olive wood as a separate fragrance, I simply attribute this wood chord to olive wood :-D
A fragrance I'd like to take up a lance for! It is relatively simple and does a lot of things right for me in this spectrum. From spring to autumn I could wear it every day and I would feel comfortable. In my opinion, the durability is above average for a fresh bottle.
Give him a chance! He's not as bad as his reputation :)
4 Comments
Translated
Show original
Better than I hoped
Oh dear, comment numero uno. For a long time I have been thinking about which fragrance I will dedicate my commentary premiere to. Now it is this one.
To get back at you... Before the Hartley, I already owned the R.M. I thought it was great except for the fact that it seemed very linear. I often had the feeling of an olfactory "tinitus" on warmer days, because the same scents dominated from beginning to end.
Then I got a package from the souk with a sample of the said Hartley and was immediately hooked. One week later I contacted the same perfume and bought a bottle with the words "I MUST have that" :-D
I didn't want to like him better than the R.M. At first. The hype was too big compared to the relatively unknown Hartley. This is totally stupid, I know...
In the end, Hartley comes across as much rounder. The opening is much more sparkling and he develops a woodier character than RM. Parallels are definitely there; a clone? No!
I also find the RM more synthetic, even though Hartley is said to have a certain dose of it here. The said "tinnitus" never occurs here.
When you least expect it... Hartley has become one of my absolute favorites and that although I thought at the beginning, he will surely move on soon. I have the RM ... How far I was wrong! RM is history now :D
I can only warmly recommend this masterpiece to everyone! Give him a chance or two. I, too, had to be taught better first!
To get back at you... Before the Hartley, I already owned the R.M. I thought it was great except for the fact that it seemed very linear. I often had the feeling of an olfactory "tinitus" on warmer days, because the same scents dominated from beginning to end.
Then I got a package from the souk with a sample of the said Hartley and was immediately hooked. One week later I contacted the same perfume and bought a bottle with the words "I MUST have that" :-D
I didn't want to like him better than the R.M. At first. The hype was too big compared to the relatively unknown Hartley. This is totally stupid, I know...
In the end, Hartley comes across as much rounder. The opening is much more sparkling and he develops a woodier character than RM. Parallels are definitely there; a clone? No!
I also find the RM more synthetic, even though Hartley is said to have a certain dose of it here. The said "tinnitus" never occurs here.
When you least expect it... Hartley has become one of my absolute favorites and that although I thought at the beginning, he will surely move on soon. I have the RM ... How far I was wrong! RM is history now :D
I can only warmly recommend this masterpiece to everyone! Give him a chance or two. I, too, had to be taught better first!
5 Comments
