All You've Ever Wanted
Wanted
Helena Rubinstein 2017

All You've Ever Wanted / Wanted by Helena Rubinstein

See Prices

More

We may earn a commission when you buy from links on our site, including the eBay Partner Network and Amazon.

See Prices

7.4 / 10 67 Ratings

A perfume by Helena Rubinstein for women, released in 2017. The scent is floral-fresh. It is still in production.
Pronunciation

More

We may earn a commission when you buy from links on our site, including the eBay Partner Network and Amazon.

Main accords

Floral

Fresh

Creamy

Sweet

Synthetic

Fragrance Notes

Peony

Vanilla

Cherry

Normalized Granite

Ratings

Scent

7.467 Ratings

Longevity

6.161 Ratings

Sillage

5.761 Ratings

Bottle

6.460 Ratings

Value for money

8.450 Ratings

Submitted by MsAd89, last update on 07/13/2025.

Smells similar

What the fragrance is similar to

Miss Dior Blooming Bouquet (2014)

Miss Dior Blooming Bouquet (2023) Eau de Toilette

Rumeur (2007) Eau de Parfum

Reviews

2 in-depth fragrance descriptions

09/28/2024

StarryBaby
5 Reviews

StarryBaby

2

Generic Floral

After all the positive stuff I had heard about it, disappointingly Nude Bouquet held no distinction for me. Just no personality at all. While real peonies smell heavenly, somehow in perfumery as a note, they tend to act as a generic floral filler completely unlike the actual flower. A slight powderiness in the drydown makes NB an almost clean floral, still saying pretty much nothing. I find nothing creamy about this. That might have helped.
I like several other Zara scents, but this one struck me as cheap-smelling.
I bought a duet of this and Fields at Nightfall, and fully expected to enjoy both. That one is a bit better, but life's too short (and my collection is too big) not to love what I'm wearing.

11/23/2024

10
Pricing 7
Bottle 6
Sillage 7
Longevity 9
Scent

Emmelysa
15 Reviews

Translated Show original

Emmelysa

7

Zara and its fragrances ...

I have to take up the cudgels for Zara fragrances.
(Disclaimer: If you decide against the fragrances in view of the general business policy, exploitation, working conditions, type of production, etc., this is of course important and correct ...I am only talking about the fragrances themselves here...)

Yes, the fragrances are priced very low, which makes it all the more amazing to me that they smell so good (many of them, not all). mMn better than some expensive fragrances I've been allowed to sniff here and there. Maybe I'm just simple-minded and can't relate to things like leather, oud and saffron. I like it floral, soft, powdery and slightly sweet. Nothing medicinal, nothing that smells three miles into the wind (stinks), "Crowd Pleaser" for all I care ... but then I stand by it. I'm not against synthetics either, but I also appreciate the smell of natural extracts.

To come to the point, I think this fragrance has everything I like and have briefly described. I am now 40 years old and yet this fragrance is not too sweet for me. It is very feminine, powdery but not squeaky-sweet. It could well be a body lotion fragrance, but not a milk-based one - but one of the fruity-sweet creams mixed with shower gel. By the way, I also like cotton scents and clean, white and "non-perfumey" fragrances. This one goes pink and you can tell you're wearing a perfume (eau de toilette). The longevity is average, but at this price you can easily spray more.

I think it suits every season and almost every age group. I see it more on women.