ZeaMoore4
15 Reviews
ZeaMoore4
1
Historical Pour Homme
There is a clear link in the evolutionary chain from "Pour Homme 2010" and the current Signature Pour Homme. It's got a more synthetic smell, but not too badly. I find it's more "fougere" and it has a more "classic barbershop" scent then the current Pour Homme. But they are pretty close generally.
I do prefer the modern Signature Pour Homme. But it's interesting and fascination to have the 2010 version, and fun to wear the earlier variation of today's masterpiece from time to time.
I absolutely love owning mine, and will never sell or decant it. To me, it's partially a historical treasure. It's a 50% oil concentration, aged 15 years, and this is a numbered 250 bottle Limited edition, never to be released again. So the value is in my opinion infinite. You can't get another bottle, and unless you now one of the 250 people who own a bottle, you'll probably never get to smell it.
I do prefer the modern Signature Pour Homme. But it's interesting and fascination to have the 2010 version, and fun to wear the earlier variation of today's masterpiece from time to time.
I absolutely love owning mine, and will never sell or decant it. To me, it's partially a historical treasure. It's a 50% oil concentration, aged 15 years, and this is a numbered 250 bottle Limited edition, never to be released again. So the value is in my opinion infinite. You can't get another bottle, and unless you now one of the 250 people who own a bottle, you'll probably never get to smell it.
