Sauvage Elixir should have been its own fragrance line. It has little to nothing to do with
Sauvage Eau de Toilette and is an amazing revolutionary fragrance in its own right, causing even niche companies to follow in its footsteps with releases like
Absolu Aventus and
Apex Parfum. Dior's follow-up to Sauvage Elixir is Sauvage Eau Forte, which in many ways can be considered its "EdT" version. I believe it's actually parfum concentration, but its performance is more similar to an EdT, despite the name "forte" (meaning "strong" in French).
Scent-wise, it is aromatic, spicy, and rich. In the opening, lavender, cardamom, and pepper dominate, then it is taken over by the same dark woody accord present in Sauvage Elixir, with anise and frankincense. This is a great fragrance. Why is it being panned?
One reason undoubtedly is the fact that Dior chose to make this a water-based, alcohol-free fragrance. When they did the same with the J'adore line in
J'adore Parfum d'Eau no one blinked an eye. In fact, if you look at the reviews for the at fragrance, women are praising the fact that it is water-based, saying it is less stripping and more moisturizing, and not one of them complained about the identical white color. However, the men reviewing Sauvage Eau Forte seem to think that it resembles a certain bodily excretion and are definitely not a fan of the color/texture. At the very least, the bottle should have been made clear like J'adore Parfum d'Eau so you could at least see that the liquid is white before spraying it (a white Sauvage bottle would have looked great too!). It was a gamble by Dior that seems to have backfired.
I believe that if this fragrance was marketed as an EdT (e.g. Sauvage Elixir EdT), was alcohol-based, and cost $120, the same as
Sauvage Eau de Toilette, this fragrance would be touted as a worthy successor to
Sauvage Elixir. I still think it is being unfairly panned and the scent should be considered independently of the price and carrier medium.