Log in

 by Avon
Bottle Design:
Lutz Herrmann
We may earn a commission when you buy from links on our site, including the eBay Partner Network and Amazon.
6.1 / 10 90 Ratings
A perfume by Avon for men, released in 2000. The scent is fresh-synthetic. The production was apparently discontinued.
Compare
Similar fragrances
We may earn a commission when you buy from links on our site, including the eBay Partner Network and Amazon.

Main accords

Fresh
Synthetic
Woody
Floral
Spicy

Fragrance Pyramid

Top Notes Top Notes
GinGin VimzorkapVimzorkap
Heart Notes Heart Notes
JasmineJasmine Yellowed CalculatorYellowed Calculator
Base Notes Base Notes
MahoganyMahogany SuedeSuede

Perfumers

Ratings
Scent
6.190 Ratings
Longevity
6.656 Ratings
Sillage
5.739 Ratings
Bottle
6.949 Ratings
Submitted by Seglein · last update on 06/17/2024.
Source-backed & verified

Smells similar

What the fragrance is similar to
Freigeist Black Edition by Wolfgang Joop
Freigeist Black Edition
Freigeist (After Shave) by Wolfgang Joop
Freigeist After Shave
Joop! Jump (Eau de Toilette) by Joop!
Joop! Jump Eau de Toilette
Wolfgang Joop (Eau de Toilette) by Wolfgang Joop
Wolfgang Joop Eau de Toilette
Opium pour Homme (Eau de Toilette) by Yves Saint Laurent
Opium pour Homme Eau de Toilette

Reviews

17 in-depth fragrance descriptions
TVC15

216 Reviews
Translated · Show originalShow translation
TVC15
TVC15
Very helpful Review 11  
Spirit-free (but not entirely unsympathetic)
So, now I’ve been able to test it as well. As Kankuro already said, it’s clearly a crowd-pleaser, a fragrance that Lieschen Müller should use to persuade her perfume-critical husband. Okay, Joop's ingratiating mentality may be somewhat questionable, but it’s really nothing different from what Calvin Klein has been doing to earn his bread for years.

Since we’ve only heard expressions of disappointment so far, but hardly anything about the scent, I’ll give it a try: Freigeist wants to come across as sophisticated and elegant, but the cheap and very synthetic ingredients unfortunately largely prevent that. I say unfortunately because I can certainly sympathize with the theoretical approach of not stomping through McDonald's like a lumberjack, as “Hugo” does. They could have done more with it.

The listed fragrance notes can only be fragmentary, because apart from the quite perceptible percentages in the form of gin (more like a Gin Fizz a la L'Eau D'Issey) and a hint of jasmine (like Acqua Di Gio and 281 others listed on Parfumo), we are again dealing with tons of fruity and always somewhat overly sweet aquatic notes (presumably Calone).

Somewhat indecisively, the lovely middle notes lead into a surprisingly masculine wood accord, which unfortunately already smells heavily of plastic again. Mahogany, really! Surprisingly, this was not the final point, as now the laminate begins to pulse in competition with the tireless freshness specter. Unusual. Perhaps also a small case study showing that artificial marine notes are becoming increasingly indestructible, because as unsatisfying as the whole thing may be, a certain endurance cannot be denied.
1 Comment
7Scent
Fleurissimo

323 Reviews
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Fleurissimo
Fleurissimo
Helpful Review 5  
Silly Name, Delicious Scent
I feel similarly about this as I do with Chanel "Egoiste": I could slap the name-giver left and right for making it impossible to admit to wearing this scent! The risk is too great that the other person thinks: "This little sausage must think he's the greatest individualist of all time! Meanwhile, he falls exactly for Mr. Joop's trick: spending money because he thinks he can buy the free spirit he doesn't have in his brain! Just like all the other free spirits - five billion flies eat shit, and five billion flies can't be wrong!"

In short, if you openly confess to "Freigeist," you can only make a fool of yourself! The marketing strategy seems to backfire - because it obscures the fact that while "Freigeist" is not a great masterpiece, it is still a really good men's fragrance. The similarities to well-known scents like "Joop! Jump" are obvious - that citrus freshness and those caramel notes.

But compared to "Jump," "Freigeist" comes across as stricter - as the bottle expresses, it leans more towards classic modernity without appearing minimalist and sparse. The floral note is significantly stricter - and with this classic touch, I believe it fits perfectly in the office.
2 Comments
8Scent
Scratch7

23 Reviews
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Scratch7
Scratch7
2  
Different, but not bad
So, I’ve signed up here to defend the honor of Freigeist. I actually quite like it. However, I can underline some remarks in the comments here. Freigeist smells synthetic and is hard to categorize. I also don’t know of any comparable fragrance.
When it first hit the market, almost simultaneously with the orange counterpart, I preferred the latter. After several tries on my skin in the following weeks, I ended up buying Freigeist because this little potion develops in a completely new, unique direction. Wolfgang Joop in the orange bottle goes in a similar direction as Absolute Man by Jil Sander. Pleasant, sweet, and "warm." Freigeist smells synthetic and "cold." I enjoy the scent in the mornings on weekends, as a kind of wake-up call. If you use a little, you have a subtle, fresh scent around your nose. After a while, a slightly warmer base develops on the skin.
The Black Edition, which performs better in the reviews here, smells less "cold" to me, and has been edited similarly to Black XS by Paco Rabanne to create L'Exces. I can detect similar components in both follow-up versions. Does anyone else notice this? :)
2 Comments
8Scent
Makaveli5

15 Reviews
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Makaveli5
Makaveli5
2  
Don't be too hard on Joop :)
It can't be that bad, because I have it at home, which says something :P Jokes aside, I find it very masculine, attractive, and warm. However, it has one drawback: it's a bit too unremarkable. If you're looking for something completely new, Freigeist is not the right choice. The first time you smell it, you think "I know this from somewhere."
The longevity is definitely impressive. You can smell it for hours. I was at a friend's place once, lounging on the couch. Of course, I had applied Freigeist. The next day I went back to him, and he said "I could still smell your perfume on the sofa in the morning." So it must hold quite well.
Conclusion: A good but not too new fragrance. I wouldn't buy it again. I'm someone who likes to buy and try new scents.
2 Comments
Leimbacher

2876 Reviews
Translated · Show originalShow translation
Leimbacher
Leimbacher
2  
Dreistgeist! - Wolfgang Joop unlike Joop
I had never seen this in the perfume shop, and even when I came across it online, it always went unnoticed by me. Fortunately, I would have been more upset if I had blindly ordered such a fragrance. Luckily, it caught my eye this week in the bottom row of the perfume shop due to its inconspicuousness, and now I can express my opinion here.

It is a medium-sized disappointment, not a stinker but absolutely meaningless and ineffective. I thought this would be a Jump or Homme brother, just a good Joop perfume, but this one is by Wolfgang Joop, not from the same brand as the great Jump or the pink classic Homme. Those are great perfumes; even Go! is still good and far better than this lukewarm infusion. It somewhat resembles Jump, but two classes worse, it could also be sold as a no-name product at Schlecker. Here, unnecessary stinginess and loveless execution were evident. Just to quickly make money with the big name, shame on the good Wolfgang Joop!

It starts with the cheap bottle design and continues with the barely noticeable sillage, so much for being strong. The longevity is okay, but with 7 hours at most, just barely so.

Here, a lot could have been created from the great idea of utilizing gin and a few other fragrance notes in a simple way, but it has failed miserably. Not fresh, not spicy, rather warm than cool. More suitable for the colder seasons. Free spirits, innovators, and people who live against the mainstream would be ashamed to wear something like this!

A disappointment across the board even if one had hardly any expectations!
3 Comments
More reviews

Statements

4 short views on the fragrance
1
The scent is fresh but not in a nice synthetic way. Now I remember why the sample was lying around.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
0 Comments
2
Synthetic, yet still an interesting scent that you don't come across often. Good price-performance ratio.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
0 Comments
7 years ago
1
Synthetic mishmash that I didn't like back then. Gin with leather and jasmine? Not a good mix.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
0 Comments
9 years ago
1
Is this supposed to be a REAL Joop? Watery, boring, flat. Discontinued after a very short time. Not worth knowing.
Translated · Show originalShow translation
0 Comments

Charts

This is how the community classifies the fragrance.
Pie Chart Radar Chart

Images

2 fragrance photos of the community

Popular by Avon

Far Away (Eau de Parfum) by Avon Absolute by Elite Gentleman by Avon Timeless (Cologne) by Avon Today (Eau de Parfum) by Avon Pur Blanca (Eau de Toilette) by Avon Soft Musk (1981) (Cologne) by Avon Gold (Eau de Parfum) by Avon Wild Country (Cologne) by Avon Far Away Royale by Avon Absynthe by Avon Sweet Honesty (Cologne) by Avon Perceive (Eau de Parfum) by Avon Incandessence (Eau de Parfum) by Avon Incandessence Lotus by Avon Little Black Dress / Chic in Black (Eau de Parfum) by Avon Far Away Infinity by Avon Topaze (Cologne) by Avon Tomorrow by Avon Far Away Rebel by Avon Occur! (Cologne) by Avon Casbah (Eau de Toilette) by Avon