05/20/2018

Ajlen
Translated
Show original

Ajlen
Top Review
34
Pseudo-exclusivity
As has already been explained in detail elsewhere, I am not someone who condemns the perfume industry for wanting to make a profit. The `C´in Chanel certainly does not stand for Caritas, and that is also absolutely okay. Supply and demand. It's not a vital good - so it'll settle on its own.
Nevertheless, for once I can't help but focus on the topic of price/performance in a commentary. Never before has it fitted so perfectly for me, because never before has there been so little to say about the scent itself as here. In principle you could copy & paste all comments to the EDP here. I have now tested the two against each other twice in parallel and both times I come to the same result: The differences are so marginal that they wouldn't even be sufficient for a discussion about different batches in Aventus.
Now one can certainly argue whether it would not be desirable for a "perfume" to smell just like an EDT or EDP, which by definition only differ in concentration. It is certainly not always the case that (as with many flanks) EDT and EDP often do not have more in common than the same name. D´accord, objection accepted. Only then one should be able to expect at least this one, i.e. a stronger intensity. But also in this respect there is no sign of this. Worse still, the perfume remains even closer to the skin than the EDP. I summarize: minimal deviations in the fragrance, negative deviations in the performance and again minimal deviations in the bottle. Okay, admittedly, it's fancy.
So what's left of this Bleu de Chanel in the perfume version? He's not bad, despite everything. But who on earth needs less power at a higher price? Is the pretence of false facts, outrageous or simply a good marketing to maximize profits? My opinion: the only relevant difference between EDP and perfume is not in the product but in the target group. There are certainly more than enough buyers who are prepared to dig deeper into their pockets for the appearance of higher exclusivity. For all the others who, like me, are only interested in fragrance, this Bleu de Chanel perfume is easy to describe: unnecessary
Nevertheless, for once I can't help but focus on the topic of price/performance in a commentary. Never before has it fitted so perfectly for me, because never before has there been so little to say about the scent itself as here. In principle you could copy & paste all comments to the EDP here. I have now tested the two against each other twice in parallel and both times I come to the same result: The differences are so marginal that they wouldn't even be sufficient for a discussion about different batches in Aventus.
Now one can certainly argue whether it would not be desirable for a "perfume" to smell just like an EDT or EDP, which by definition only differ in concentration. It is certainly not always the case that (as with many flanks) EDT and EDP often do not have more in common than the same name. D´accord, objection accepted. Only then one should be able to expect at least this one, i.e. a stronger intensity. But also in this respect there is no sign of this. Worse still, the perfume remains even closer to the skin than the EDP. I summarize: minimal deviations in the fragrance, negative deviations in the performance and again minimal deviations in the bottle. Okay, admittedly, it's fancy.
So what's left of this Bleu de Chanel in the perfume version? He's not bad, despite everything. But who on earth needs less power at a higher price? Is the pretence of false facts, outrageous or simply a good marketing to maximize profits? My opinion: the only relevant difference between EDP and perfume is not in the product but in the target group. There are certainly more than enough buyers who are prepared to dig deeper into their pockets for the appearance of higher exclusivity. For all the others who, like me, are only interested in fragrance, this Bleu de Chanel perfume is easy to describe: unnecessary
8 Replies