Translated
Show original
Show translation
Ala79
3
Risk-averse rose power
If you were to ask me "who would like this fragrance?", the answer would be simple: "Someone who likes Aventus for her, plus strongly scented roses in the color of the bottle, and a lot of both for a long time, will be happy with Carmina."
For me, the DNA is clearly based on Aventus for her, very clearly. It worked before, so why not do it again? Yes, you can do it. The spicy, peppery flavor with less fruit... In addition, they have chosen a main player that will definitely find a large group of fans: Roses.
I might catch a glimpse of cherries for a few seconds and with a lot of imagination, of saffron or myrrh and the like - erm, no. I was seriously surprised by some of the listed fragrances.
The fragrance itself is solidly crafted, and I find it positive, for example, that despite the powerful presence of rose for me, nothing is scratchy or prickly, as rose tends to do for me very quickly. I don't find it too synthetic either. In this respect, a successful rose fragrance.
On a positive note - and this is what many people want these days - it also has a decent radiance and longevity. Not to say enormous. My rather fragrance-resistant husband noticed it repeatedly after one spray. But nothing more than "yes, quite good, so nice" came from his lips. And that's how I see it too. Quite good, but not very special, not very innovative, not very risk-taking, not very outstanding, as I expect from houses in the league and with the marketing at the moment.
The durability: 36 hours after application, an active day in between, showering still clearly perceptible from 20 cm away for me. For some, this is a compelling argument, and I think Creed has captured the spirit of the times here. And that is probably the most surprising thing for me with this Creed - for me, Creeds are not necessarily synonymous with longevity and, with a normal dosage, not with enormous sillage either.
So is Carmina a crowdpleaser? I would say, based on the "key data" it has the potential to be, yes.
But for me it's too much overall, and at the same time too little, hmm, surprisingly, because it stays too much on the safe side.