L'Eau d'Issey pour Homme Eau de Toilette has established itself as a true classic in the fragrance game, similarly to
Terre d'Hermès Eau de Toilette, for example. Back in the late 90s when it was released, it offered a modern character that was hard to fault. But that was back then. And while I believe that true classics never go out of style, whatever
L'Eau d'Issey pour Homme Eau de Toilette has become nowadays just simply doesn't hold up to its name anymore.
That is to say that either we've gotten spoiled with more "in your face" compositions that made
L'Eau d'Issey pour Homme Eau de Toilette take a step back, or it has suffered some reformulations along the decades. After some digging, reformulations definitely happened, but not enough to catastrophically alter the original DNA. So in the end, I simply think I'm not a huge fan overall. It is pleasant, undoubtedly, and very easy to recognize. It opens very sharp with a yuzu squeeze, offering that lovely zesty, gently bitter citric character, whilst being complemented with some juicy and less effervescent mandarin. The aquatic accord is immediately set up after that opening, with a more clean, out-of-the-shower rendition of aquatic and less marine/briny. Frankly, it smells exactly as if you've just come out of the shower. Some very gentle nutmeg brings a touch of spicy warmth, next to the water lily which is at the helm of the aquatic structure.
Little else happens afterwards. I get a rather faint woodiness, very airy and light, that presents a somewhat sweet ambery accent. But neither the sandalwood, nor the vetiver truly stand out with one of their signature attributes. Just a mingle of shy and very clean woods. Now, I respect it for what it has done to the industry, and it is without doubt a pleasant, classy citrus-freshie. But... it just falls a little bland, especially if compared to other classics (I keep coming back to
Terre d'Hermès Eau de Toilette) that seem to offer something more standout, distinct.
L'Eau d'Issey pour Homme Eau de Toilette doesn't really stand out to me in a special way nowadays, which is why the lower rating.
Let's be honest: it doesn't take much to tell that performance here will lamentably be underwhelming. On my skin, I actually sort of got 6-7 hours of longevity (fair, in ideal testing conditions), which is a pretty good showing. But projection was simply not offering much after the first hour. You get largely all the pushing power and sillage squeezed out in that first hour, instead of having a more steady bubble for longer.
L'Eau d'Issey pour Homme Eau de Toilette, like many others, just go all in at the start, and by the 2-3 hour mark largely no one will be able to detect it anymore.
Let's be honest once more: it takes even less to tell just how versatile
L'Eau d'Issey pour Homme Eau de Toilette is. It kind of had to be, in the end; niche compositions weren't quite as popular back in the 90s. People simply wanted to smell good rather than "interesting". And there I believe that this fragrance succeeded the most. It can be worn to school, to work, to sports, to family gatherings... It's signature worthy too, but it might come across as a little "older" nowadays, but if I'm being honest, I'd rather be told that I smell like grandpa rather than "modern" with an ambroxan/amberwood bomb.
That's also why I'd much rather pick
L'Eau d'Issey pour Homme Eau de Toilette than any highly popular hype beast that's making waves at Sephora. Issey Miyake's signature piece still holds up, and with prices being rather friendly too, why not if all you want is to smell good? You could argue I could say the same for any synthetic piece of crap out there, but in the end, if I have another option that while not "up to date" for today's standards, misses out on the soulless, synthetic-to-the-gills money-grab structure, why would I ever choose the latter? But also, if I have something like
Terre d'Hermès Eau de Toilette, why go with
L'Eau d'Issey pour Homme Eau de Toilette? Sure, the Miyake is an aquatic, while the Hermès focuses more on an earthy, dirty citrus. But when put side-by-side,
Terre d'Hermès Eau de Toilette just comes on top, no diff. It offers a better-put composition while also having more character. That doesn't rule out
L'Eau d'Issey pour Homme Eau de Toilette completely; by all means, it's a good fragrance still and worth considering. But it's not a classic I'm personally drawn towards.
Overall Rating: 5.2/10