01/06/2025

Smirky
450 Reviews

Smirky
Very helpful Review
10
Very nice oud with minimal animalic accord
This is a joint review of Initio Oud for Greatness and its Lattafa clone, Oud for Glory, which I tested on consecutive days and compared directly at the same time. I'll start out by saying that to me, the two fragrances are about 95% identical in the final dry down (about 30 minutes after applying). Oud for Greatness opens with what I'm assuming is a saffron + nutmeg scent and shortly followed by a mild oud-y barnyard stink. That quickly disappears (maybe 5 minutes) and it continues to evolve with the woody oud scent (without the stink) becoming a bit more prominent.
Oud for Glory, OTOH, opens up straight woody and a bit peppery. There was absolutely no barnyard stink either. As it dried down, the patch became more prominent. However, after about 30 minutes, both fragrances pretty much converge and were almost identical. I'd say Oud for Greatness has a bit more emphasis on the saffron and nutmeg while Oud for Glory emphasizes the patch. In both, the woody oud scent is primary. Both fragrances are very masculine with excellent performance. In my testing, Oud for Glory's performance had a very slight edge over Oud for Greatness.
I also compared both Oud for Greatness and Oud for Glory to wrist sprays of Amouage's Opus XIII Silver Oud and Armaf's Special Amber Oud (which is a clone of Roja's Amber Aoud). There was no expectation in my mind that these latter two fragrances would be similar to either OfG; they aren't. I just wanted to see where they fit into the Oud picture. I'd put Silver Oud all the way at the right. It's got a strong animalic woody oud scent. The two OfG's are in the middle with a milder woody oud scent and not really animalic. Special Amber Oud is at the left with stronger amber & leather notes along with some sweeter vanilla. I like all four; they just scratch a different itch. None of them struck me as synthetic or screeching smelling.
Regarding Oud for Greatness and Oud for Glory, I actually preferred the clone, Oud for Glory, over the real thing when doing a direct A/B comparison, so that's the one I'm going with. To be honest, if I hadn't compared them directly, I probably would not have noticed a difference - they are so close.
Oud for Glory, OTOH, opens up straight woody and a bit peppery. There was absolutely no barnyard stink either. As it dried down, the patch became more prominent. However, after about 30 minutes, both fragrances pretty much converge and were almost identical. I'd say Oud for Greatness has a bit more emphasis on the saffron and nutmeg while Oud for Glory emphasizes the patch. In both, the woody oud scent is primary. Both fragrances are very masculine with excellent performance. In my testing, Oud for Glory's performance had a very slight edge over Oud for Greatness.
I also compared both Oud for Greatness and Oud for Glory to wrist sprays of Amouage's Opus XIII Silver Oud and Armaf's Special Amber Oud (which is a clone of Roja's Amber Aoud). There was no expectation in my mind that these latter two fragrances would be similar to either OfG; they aren't. I just wanted to see where they fit into the Oud picture. I'd put Silver Oud all the way at the right. It's got a strong animalic woody oud scent. The two OfG's are in the middle with a milder woody oud scent and not really animalic. Special Amber Oud is at the left with stronger amber & leather notes along with some sweeter vanilla. I like all four; they just scratch a different itch. None of them struck me as synthetic or screeching smelling.
Regarding Oud for Greatness and Oud for Glory, I actually preferred the clone, Oud for Glory, over the real thing when doing a direct A/B comparison, so that's the one I'm going with. To be honest, if I hadn't compared them directly, I probably would not have noticed a difference - they are so close.
1 Comment