
Omnipotato
569 Reviews

Omnipotato
Helpful Review
8
Minimalist "clean" masterpiece
There's a meme going around that compares women's deodorant names to men's. The women's deodorants have descriptive names/scents like cherry, lavender, and cucumber, while the men's are just called "cool silver" or "phoenix," and not descriptive of the actual scent at all. It's a funny observation, and I think indicative of the fact that women want to smell like fruits, flowers, and sweets, while men just want to smell "clean." The reason for this, whether it's cultural, biological, or a result of marketing, is clearly outside the scope of a silly Parfumo review, but I think it's a fact in this day and age: so many men's fragrances just smell "soapy" or "shower-gel"-like without well-defined and distinct notes.
Amyris Homme Extrait de Parfum is one of these. It smells "clean." What specific note makes it smell clean? Is it the citrusy opening? Is it the "blue" shower-gel-like fresh notes? Is it the tonka/coumarin sweetness that has pervaded men's fragrance ever since its original appearance in Fougère Royale (1882) Parfum? Is it the light, airy ozonic notes that run through the entirety of the fragrance? I think all of these work together in harmony to create this feeling of freshness and cleanness. That's why men's fragrance doesn't usually get the simple "cherry" or "lavender" description. It's a bit more complex to create a "fresh" scent. This fragrance, though, does have a specific note in its name, although it's one that not many people have heard of. It is built around the woody note of amyris.
Amyris is an interesting oil. It is not quite as sought after as sandalwood and is sometimes used as a cheaper alternative. It is lighter and a little less creamy than its more expensive counterpart. So it's definitely a strange choice to build a fragrance/accord around. But I think Mr. Kurkdjian knew what he was doing. First of all, because of its relative affordability, I believe a large amount of real amyris oil was used here. If sandalwood was used this liberally, the price of this fragrance would probably be double or triple its already high price. Second, even though sandalwood has more depth and character, that is not what this fragrance needs. It is simply trying to impart a fresh/clean feeling - not make a loud, brash statement. Third, I think he is trying to showcase his creative/artistic muscle by choosing an "inferior" scent profile to base his scent around. Regardless of the reasoning, I believe the choice was a good one and a perfect profile to create a minimalist design around.
The composition is not complex. Really, it's pretty much one accord: amyris. The amyris tree is part of the citrus family - let's include orange to amp that up. It has a faintly sweet balsamic aroma in the drydown - let's add some vanilla and tonka bean to fortify that. But it's a masterpiece in its simplicity. I could see people smelling this and writing it off as just another "clean" scent that doesn't have a lot of depth. And it is that. But I think it's one of the best in its class.
Amyris Homme Extrait de Parfum is one of these. It smells "clean." What specific note makes it smell clean? Is it the citrusy opening? Is it the "blue" shower-gel-like fresh notes? Is it the tonka/coumarin sweetness that has pervaded men's fragrance ever since its original appearance in Fougère Royale (1882) Parfum? Is it the light, airy ozonic notes that run through the entirety of the fragrance? I think all of these work together in harmony to create this feeling of freshness and cleanness. That's why men's fragrance doesn't usually get the simple "cherry" or "lavender" description. It's a bit more complex to create a "fresh" scent. This fragrance, though, does have a specific note in its name, although it's one that not many people have heard of. It is built around the woody note of amyris.
Amyris is an interesting oil. It is not quite as sought after as sandalwood and is sometimes used as a cheaper alternative. It is lighter and a little less creamy than its more expensive counterpart. So it's definitely a strange choice to build a fragrance/accord around. But I think Mr. Kurkdjian knew what he was doing. First of all, because of its relative affordability, I believe a large amount of real amyris oil was used here. If sandalwood was used this liberally, the price of this fragrance would probably be double or triple its already high price. Second, even though sandalwood has more depth and character, that is not what this fragrance needs. It is simply trying to impart a fresh/clean feeling - not make a loud, brash statement. Third, I think he is trying to showcase his creative/artistic muscle by choosing an "inferior" scent profile to base his scent around. Regardless of the reasoning, I believe the choice was a good one and a perfect profile to create a minimalist design around.
The composition is not complex. Really, it's pretty much one accord: amyris. The amyris tree is part of the citrus family - let's include orange to amp that up. It has a faintly sweet balsamic aroma in the drydown - let's add some vanilla and tonka bean to fortify that. But it's a masterpiece in its simplicity. I could see people smelling this and writing it off as just another "clean" scent that doesn't have a lot of depth. And it is that. But I think it's one of the best in its class.
Updated on 12/26/2023
3 Comments



Caribbean amyris
Sicilian mandarin orange
Brazilian tonka bean absolute
Iris pallida root
Vanilla
Ceylonese cinnamon
Saffron








BamBamNYC
RisingChaos
Mauog
Viktor1989
Traian1999



































